Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century

Geographical Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 341-353

  Kwan, Mei Po ^a   Weber, Joe ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; MOBILITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0242710567     PISSN: 00167363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2003.tb01119.x     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
2. Archer, W. R., and M. T. Smith (1993). Why Do Suburban Offices Cluster? Geographical Analysis 25, 53-64.
3. Black, W. R. (2001). An Unpopular Essay on Transportation. Journal of Transport Geography 9, 1-11.
4. Burgess, E. W. (1925). The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project. In The City, edited by R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, and R. D. McKenzie, pp. 47-62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Burns, L. D. (1979). Transportation, Temporal, and Spatial Components of Accessibility. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
6. Church, R. L., and J. Marston (2003). Measuring Accessibility for People with a Disability. Geographical Analysis 35, 83-96.
7. Davis, M. (1998). Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
8. Dear, M., and S. Flusty (1998). Postmodern Urbanism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88, 50-72.
9. Dijst, M., and V. Vidakovic (2000). Travel Time Ratio: The Key Factor of Spatial Reach. Transportation 27, 179-99.
10. Dijst, M., T. de Jong, and J. R. van Eck (2002). Opportunities for Transport Mode Change: An Exploration of a Disaggregated Approach. Environment and Planning B 29, 413-30.
11. Dodge, M. (2000). Accessibility to Information within the Internet: How Can It Be Measured and Mapped? In Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility, edited by D. G. Janelle and D. C. Hodge, pp. 187-204. Berlin: Springer.
12. England, K. V. L. (1991). Gender Relations and the Spatial Structure of the City. Geoforum 22, 135-47.
13. England, K. V. L. (1993). Suburban Pink Collar Ghettos: The Spatial Entrapment of Women? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83, 225-42.
14. Fishman, R. (1990). Megalopolis Unbound. The Wilson Quarterly 14, 25-45.
15. Forer, P., and O. Huisman (2000). Space, Time and Sequencing: Substitution at the Physical/Virtual Interface. In Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility, edited by D. G. Janelle and D. C. Hodge, pp. 73-90, Berlin: Springer.
16. Garreau, J. (1991). Edge City. Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday.
17. Gilbert, M. (1998). "Race," Space, and Power: The Survival Strategies of Working Poor Women. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 88, 595-621.
18. Gillespie, A. and R. Richardson (2000). Teleworking and the City: Myths of Workplace Transeendence and Travel Reduction. In Cities in the Telecommunications Age: The Fracturing of Geographies, edited by J. O. Wheeler, Y. Aoyama, and B. Warf, pp. 229-45. New York: Routledge.
19. Giuliano, G. (1989). New Directions for Understanding Transportation and Land Use. Environment and Planning A 21, 145-59.
20. Giuliano, G., and K. A. Small (1991). Subcenters in the Los Angeles Region. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, 163-82.
21. Goodchild, M. F., and D. G. Janelle (1984). The City around the Clock: Space-Time Patterns of Urban Ecological Structure. Environment and Planning A 16, 807-20.
22. Graham, S. (1998). The End of Geography or the Explosion of Place?: Conceptualizing Space, Place, and Information Technology. Progress in Human Geography 22, 165-85.
23. Green, M., and R. Flowerdew (1996). New Evidence on the Modifiable Unit Problem. In Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment. edited by P. Longley and M. Batty, 41-54. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
24. Guy, C. M. (1983). The Assessment of Access to Local Shopping Opportunities: A Comparison of Accessibility Measures. Environment and Planning B 10, 219-38.
25. Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about People in Regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association 24, 7-21.
26. Hamilton, B. W. (1982). Wasteful Commuting. Journal of Political Economy 90, 1035-53.
27. Handy, S. (1992). Regional versus Local Accessibility: Neo-Traditional Development and Its Implications for Non-Work Travel. Built Environment 18, 253-67.
28. Handy, S., and D. A. Niemeier (1997). Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A 29, 1175-94.
29. Hanson, S., and G. Pratt (1995). Gender, Work, and Space. London: Routledge.
30. Harris, C. D., and E. L. Ullman (1945). The Nature of Cities. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 242, 7-17.
31. Harvey, A., and P. A. Macnab (2000). Who's Up?: Global Interpersonal Temporal Accessibility. In Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility, edited by D. G. Janelle and D. C. Hodge, pp. 147-70. Berlin: Springer.
32. Heikkila, E., P. Gordon, J. I. Kim, R. B. Peiser, and H. W. Richardson (1989). What Happened to the CBD-Distance Gradient?: Land Values in a Policentric City. Environment and Planning A 21, 221-32.
33. Henderson, D. K. and P. L. Mokhtarian (1996). Impacts of Center-Based Telecommuting on Travel and Emissions: Analysis of the Puget Sound Demonstration Project. Transportation Research D 1, 29-45.
34. Hoch, I., and P. Waddell (1993). Apartment Rents: Another Challenge to the Monocentric Model. Geographical Analysis 25, 20-31.
35. Holzer, H. J. (1991). The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown? Urban Studies 28, 105-22.
36. Hoyt, H. (1939). The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Washington, D.C.: Federal Housing Administration.
37. Janelle, D. G. (1973). Measuring Human Extensibility in a Shrinking World. Journal of Geography 72, 8-15.
38. Janelle, D. G. (1995). Metropolitan Expansion, Telecommuting, and Transportation. In The Geography of Urban Transportation, Second Edition, edited by S. Hanson, pp. 407-34. New York: Guilford.
39. Janelle, D. G., and D. C. Hodge, eds. (2000). Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility. Berlin: Springer.
40. Jones, K., and C. Duncan (1996). People and Places: The Multilevel Model as a General Framework for the Quantitative Analysis of Geographical Data. In Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment, edited by P. Longley and M. Batty, pp. 79-104. Cambridge: Geoinformation International.
41. Kim, H.-M., and M.-P. Kwan (2003). Space-Time Accessibility Measures: A Geocomputational Algorithm with a Focus on the Feasible Opportunity Set and Possible Activity Duration. Journal of Geographical Systems 5, 71-91.
42. Kitamura, R., K. Nishii, and K. Goulias (1990). Trip Chaining Behavior by Central City Commuters: A Causal Analysis of Time-Space Constraints. In Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis, edited by P. Jones, 145-70. Aldershot: Avebury.
43. Kitchin, R. M. (1998). Towards Geographies of Cyberspace. Progress in Human Geography 22, 385-406.
44. Kwan, M.-P. (1998). Space-Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-Based Framework. Geographical Analysis: 30, 191-217.
45. Kwan, M.-P. (1999a). Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space-Time Measures. The Professional Geographer 51, 210-27.
46. Kwan, M.-P. (1999b). Gender, the Home-Work Link, and Space-Time Patterns of Nonemployment Activities. Economic Geography 75, 370-94.
47. Kwan, M.-P. (2000a). Analysis of Human Spatial Behavior in a GIS Environment: Recent Developments and Future Prospects. Journal of Geographical Systems 2, 85-90.
48. Kwan, M.-P. (2000b). Gender Differences in Space-Time Constraints. Area 32, 145-56.
49. Kwan, M.-P. (2000c). Human Extensibility and Individual Hybrid-Accessibility in Space-Time: A Multi-Scale Representation Using GIS. In Information, Place, and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility, edited by D. G. Janelle and D. C. Hodge, pp. 241-56. Berlin: Springer.
50. Kwan, M.-P. (2000d). Interactive Geovisualization of Activity-Travel Patterns Using Three-Dimensional Geographical Information Systems: A Methodological Exploration with a Large Data Set. Transportation Research C 8, 185-203.
51. Kwan, M.-P. (2001). Cyberspatial Cognition and Individual Access to Information: The Behavioral Foundation of Cybergeography. Environment and Planning B 28, 21-37.
52. Kwan, M.-P. (2002) Time, Information Technologies and the Geographies of Everyday Life. Urban Geography 23(5), 471-82.
53. Kwan, M.-P., and X.-P. Hong (1998). Network-Based Constraints-Oriented Choice Set Formation Using GIS. Geographical Systems 5, 139-62.
54. Kwan, M.-P., and J. Lee (2003). Geovisualization of Human Activity Patterns Using 3D GIS-A Time-Geographic Approach. In Spatially Integrated Social Science, edited by M. F. Goodchild and D. G. Janelle (forthcoming) New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Kwan, M.-P., A. T. Murray, M. E. O'Kelly, and M. Tiefelsfort (2003). Recent Advances in Accessibility Research: Representation, Methodology and Applications. Journal of Geographical Systems 5, 129-38.
56. Lee, H., and E. A. Whitley (2002). Time and Information Technology: Temporal Impacts on Individuals, Organizations, and Society. The Information Society 18, 235-40.
57. Lee, K., and H. Lee (1998). A New Algorithm for Graph-Theoretic Nodal Accessibility Measurement. Geographical Analysis 30, 1-14.
58. Lenntorp, B. (1976). Paths in Space-Time Environments: A Time-Geographic Study of the Movement Possibilities of Individuals. Lund Studies in Geography B: Human Geography. Lund: Gleerup.
59. Lenntorp, B. (1978). A Time-Geographic Simulation Model of Individual Activity Programmes. In Human Activity and Time Geography, edited by T. Carlstein, D. Parkes, and N. Thrift, pp. 162-80. London: Edward Arnold.
60. Marshall, A. (2000). How Cities Work: Suburbs, Sprawl, and the Roads Not Taken. Austin: University of Texas Press.
61. Michelson, W. (1985). From Sun to Sun Daily Obligations and Community Structure in the Lives of Employed Women and Their Families. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.
62. Miller, H. (1999). Measuring Space-Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures. Geographical Analysis 31, 187-212.
63. Mokhtarian, P. L. (1990). A Typology of Relationships between Telecommunications and Transportation. Transportation Research A 24, 231-42.
64. Mokhtarian, P. L., and R. Meenakshisundaram (1999). Beyond Tele-Substitution: Disaggregate Longitudinal Structural Equations Modeling of Communication Impacts. Transportation Research C 7, 33-52.
65. Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and Housing. The Spatial Pattern of Urban Residential Land Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Nie, N., and L. Erbring (2000). Internet and Society. A Preliminary Report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society (SIQSS), Stanford University, California.
67. O'Sullivan, D., A. Morrison, and J. Shearer (2000). Using Desktop GIS for the Investigation of Accessibility by Public Transport: An Isochrone Approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14, 85-104.
68. Pendyala, R. M., K. Goulias, and R. Kitamura (1991). Impact of Telecommuting on Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Household Travel. Transportation 18, 411-32.
69. Pirie, G. H. (1979). Measuring Accessibility: A Review and a Proposal. Environment and Planning A 11, 299-312.
70. Pooler, J. (1987). Measuring Geographical Accessibility: A Review of Current Approaches and Problems in the Use of Population Potentials. Geoforum 18, 269-89.
71. Robinson, J. P., M. Kestnbaum, A. Neustandtl, and A. Alvarez (2000). Mass Media Use and Social Life among Internet Users. Social Science Computer Review 18, 490-501.
72. Saxena, S. and P. L. Mokhtarian (1997). The Impact of Telecommuting on the Activity Spaces of Participants. Geographical Analysis 29, 124-44.
73. Shen, Q. (1998). Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhood and Employment Accessibility of Low-Wage Workers. Environment and Planning B 25, 345-65.
74. Shen, Q. (1999). Transportation, Telecommunications, and the Changing Geography of Opportunity. Urban Geography 20, 334-55.
75. Small, K. A., and S. Song (1992). Wasteful Commuting: A Resolution. Journal of Political Economy 100, 888-98.
76. Sui, D. (1998). GIS-Based Urban Modeling: Practices, Problems, and Prospects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12(7), 651-71.
77. UCLA-CCP. (2003). The UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles.
78. Vance, J. E., Jr. (1964). Geography and Urban Evolution in the San Francisco Bay Area. San Francisco: Institute of Governmental Studies.
79. van Wee, B., M. Ilagoort, and J. A. Annema (2001). Accessibility Measures with Competition. Journal of Transport Geography 9, 199-208.
80. Wachs, M., and T. G. Kumagai (1973). Physical Accessibility as a Social Indicator. Socio-economic Planning Science 7, 437-56.
81. Wachs, M., B. D. Taylor, N. Levine, and P. Ong (1993). The Changing Commute: A Case-Study of the Jobs-Housing Relationship over Time. Urban Studies 30, 1711-29.
82. Waddell, P. (1993). Exogenous Workplace Choice in Residential Location Models: Is the Assumption Valid? Geographical Analysis 25, 63-82.
83. Waddell, P., B. J. L. Berry, and I. Hoch (1993). Housing Price Gradients: The Intersection of Space and Built Form. Geographical Analysis 25, 5-19.
84. Waddell, P., and V. Shukla (1993). Manufacturing Location in a Polycentric Urban Area: A Study in the Composition and Attractiveness of Employment Subcenters. Urban Geography 14, 277-96.
85. Warf, B. (2001). Segueways into Cyberspace: Multiple Geographies of the Digital Divide. Environment and Planning B 28, 3-19.
86. Weber, J. (2001). Evaluating the Effects of Context and Scale on Individual Accessibility: A Multilevel Approach, Ph.D. diss., Department of Geography, Ohio State University.
87. Weber, J. (2003). Individual Accessibility and Distance from Major Employment Centers: An Examination Using Space-Time Measures. Journal of Geographical Systems 5, 51-70.
88. Weber, J., and M.-P. Kwan (2002). Bringing Time Back in: A Study on the Influence of Travel Time Variations and Facility Opening Hours on Individual Accessibility. The Professional Geographer 54, 226-40.
89. Weber J., and M.-P. Kwan (2003). Evaluating the Effects of Geographic Contexts on Individual Accessibility: A Multilevel Approach. Urban Geography (forthcoming).