Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications

Journal of Geographical Systems

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 129-138

  Kwan, Mei Po ^a   Murray, Alan T ^a   O'Kelly, Morton E ^a   Tiefelsdorf, Michael ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Applications; Methodology; Representation; Spatial analysis

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ACCESSIBILITY; METHODOLOGY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037929513     PISSN: 14355930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s101090300107     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Barabasi AL (2002) Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus, Cambridge, MA
2. Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509-512
3. Barabasi AL, Albert R, Jeong H (1999) Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks. Physica A 272:173-187
4. Berglund S. Karlström A (1999) Identifying local spatial association in flow data. Journal of Geographical Systems 1:219-236
5. Black WR (1992) Network autocorrelation in transport network and flow systems. Geographical Analysis 24:207-222
6. Bolduc D. Laferrière R, Santarossa G (1995) Spatial autoregressive error components in travel flow models: an application to aggregate mode choice. In: Anselin L, Florax R (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
7. Boots BN, Kanaroglou P (1988) Incorporating the effects of spatial structure in discrete choice models of migration. Journal of Regional Science 28:495-507
8. Bureau of Census (1995) 1990 County to county migration. Special project 312. U.S. Department of Commerce, Atlanta
9. Burns LD (1979) Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA
10. Cao J. Davis D. Vander Wiel S. Yu B (2000) Time-varying network tomography: Router link data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95:1063-1075
11. Carre B (1979) Graphs and networks. Clarendon Press, Oxford
12. Church R, Marston J (2003) Measuring accessibility for people with disability. Geographical Analysis 35(1):83-96
13. Church R, ReVelle C (1974) The maximal covering location problem. Papers of the Regional Science Association 32:101-118
14. Congdon P (2000) A Bayesian approach to prediction using the gravity model, with an application to patient flow modeling. Geographical Analysis 32:205-224
15. Davis PS, Greenwood MJ, Haizheng L (2001) A conditional logit approach to U.S. state-to-state migration. Journal of Regional Science 41:337-360
16. Dijst M, Vidakovic V (2000) Travel time ratio: The key factor of spatial reach. Transportation 27:179-199
17. Dijst M, de Jong T, van Eck JR (2002) Opportunities for transport mode change: An exploration of a disaggregated approach. Environment and Planning B 29(3):413-430
18. Ferguson MF, Kanaroglou PS (1995) Utility variability within aggregate spatial units and its relevance to discrete models in destination choice. In: Anselin L, Florax RJGM (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin, pp 243-269
19. Fischer MM, Reismann M (2002) A methodology for neural spatial interaction modeling. Geographical Analysis 34:207-228
20. Fotheringham AS, Pitts TC (1995) Directional variation in distance-decay. Environment and Planning A 27:715-729
21. Gimpel JG, Schuknecht JE (2003) Political participation and the accessibility of the ballot box. Political Geography. (Forthcoming)
22. Gleason J (1975) A set covering approach to bus stop location. Omega 3:605-608
23. Grubesic TH, O'Kelly ME, Murray AT (2003) A geographic perspective on telecommunication network survivability. Telematics and Informatics 20:51-69
24. Guy CM (1983) The assessment of access to local shopping opportunities: A comparison of accessibility measures. Environment and Planning B 10:219-238.
25. Hägerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association 24:7-21
26. Hakimi SL (1965) "Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some related graph theoretic problems. Operations Research 13:462-475
27. Hansen WG (1959) How accessibility shape land use. Journal of American Institute of Planners 25:73-76
28. Hanson S, Schwab M (1987) Accessibility and intraurban travel. Environment and Planning A 19:735-48
29. Horner MW (2002) Extensions to the concept of excess commuting. Environment and Planning A 34: 543-566
30. Horner MW, Murray AT (2002) Excess commuting and the modifiable areal unit problem. Urban Studies 39(1):131-139
31. Horner MW, Murray AT (2003) Reducing congestion through strategic planning. Regional Studies 37:135-146
32. Kim HM, Kwan MP (2003) Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of Geographical Systems 5:71-91
33. Kwan MP (1998) Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 30:191-216
34. Kwan MP (1999) Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. The Professional Geographer 51:210-227
35. Kwan MP (2001) Cyberspatial cognition and individual access to information: The behavioral foundation of cybergeography. Environment and Planning B 28(1):21-37
36. Kwan MP (2002) Time, information technologies and the geographies of everyday life. Urban Geography 23(5):471-482
37. Kwan MP, Hong XD (1998) Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Geographical Systems 5:139-162
38. Lee K, Lee H (1996) A new algorithm for graph-theoretic nodal accessibility measurement. Geographical Analysis 30:1-14
39. Lenntorp B (1976) Paths in space-time environments: A time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, Human Geography number 44, The Royal University of Lund, Sweden
40. McLafferty S, Preston V (1996) Spatial mismatch and employment in a decade of restructuring. The Professional Geographer 48(4):420-31
41. Miller HJ (1996) GIS and geometric representation in facility location problems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10:791-816
42. Miller HJ (1999) Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational methods. Geographical Analysis 31:187-212
43. Mirchandani P, Francis RL (1990) Discrete Location Theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York
44. Murray AT (2001) Strategic analysis of public transport coverage. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35:175-188
45. Murray AT (2003) A coverage model for improving public transit system accessibility and expanding access. Annals of Operations Research. (forthcoming)
46. Murray AT, Davis R, Stimson RJ, Ferreira L (1998) Public transport access. Transportation Research D 3:319-328
47. Murray AT, O'Kelly ME (2002) Assessing representation error in point-based coverage modeling. Journal of Geographical Systems 4:171-191
48. Murray AT, Wu X (2003) Accessibility tradeoffs in public transit planning. Journal of Geographical Systems 5:93-107
49. Nakaya T (2003) Local spatial interaction modelling based on the geographically weighted regression approach. In: Thomas R, Boots B. Okabe A (eds) Modelling geographical systems: Statistical and computational applications. Dordrecht, Kluwer, forthcoming
50. O'Kelly ME (1998) A geographer's analysis of hub-and-spoke systems. Journal of Transport Geography 6:171-186
51. O'Sullivan D, Morrison A, Shearer J (2000) Using desktop GIS for the investigation of accessibility by public transport: An isochrone approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14:85-104
52. Plane AD (1999) Time series perspective and physical geography analogies in migration research. In: Pandit K, Davis Withers S (eds) Migration and restructuring in the United States: A geographic perspective. Rowman & Littlefield, Boston, pp. 313-335
53. ReVelle CS, Swain RW (1970) Central facilities location. Geographical Analysis 2:30-42
54. Scott LM (2000) Evaluating intra-metropolitan accessibility in the information age: Operational issues, objectives and implementation. In: Janelle DG, Hodge DC (eds) Information, place, and cyberspace: Issues in accessibility, Springer, Berlin, pp 21-45
55. Shen Q (1998) Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhood and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environment and Planning B 25:345-65
56. Talen E (1997) The social equity of urban service distribution: An exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado, and Macon, Georgia. Urban Geography 18(6):521-41
57. Talen E (2001) School, community, and spatial equity: An empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91(3):435-450
58. Tiefelsdorf M, Braun GO (1997) The migratory system of Berlin after the unification in the context of global restructuring. Geographica Polonica 69:23-44
59. Toregas C, Swain R, ReVelle C, Bergman L (1971) The location of emergency service facilities. Operations Research 19:1363-1373
60. Villoria OG (1989) An Operational Measure of Individual Accessibility for Use in the Study of Travel-Activity Patterns. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of the Ohio State University.
61. Wang F, Minor WW (2002) Where the jobs are: Employment access and crime patterns in Cleveland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(3):465-486
62. Weber J (2003) Individual accessibility and distance from major employment centers: An examination using space-time measures. Journal of Geographical Systems 5:51-70
63. Weber J, Kwan MP (2002) Bringing time back in: A study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. The Professional Geographer 54:226-240
64. Weber J, Kwan MP (2003) Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts on individual accessibility: A multilevel approach. Urban Geography. (forthcoming)
65. Wirasinghe SC and Ghoneim NS (1981) Spacing of bus-stops for many to many travel demand. Transportation Science 15:210-221