Statistical tests between competing hypotheses of hox cluster evolution

Systematic Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 708-718

  Lanfear, Robert ^a,b,c   Bromham, Lindell ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Homeobox; Maximum likelihood; ParaHox; Phylogenetics; ProtoHox

Indexed keywords

HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETICS; INVERTEBRATE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT;

ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; INVERTEBRATES; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

ANIMALIA; BILATERIA;

EID: 53849143316     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150802430079     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brooke, N. M., J. Garcia-Fernandez, and P. W. H. Holland. 1998. The ParaHox gene cluster is an evolutionary sister of the Hoxgene cluster. Nature 392:920-922.
2. Budd, G. E. 1999. Does evolution in body patterning genes drive morphological change - Or vice versa? Bioessays 21:326-332.
3. Chourrout, D., F. Delsuc, P. Chourrout, R. B. Edvardsen, F. Rentzsch, E. Renfer, M. F. Jensen, B. Zhu, P. de Jong, R. E. Steele, and U. Technau. 2006. Minimal ProtoHox cluster inferred from bilaterian and cnidarian Hox complements. Nature 442:684-687.
4. de Rosa, R., J. K. Grenier, T. Andreeva, C. E. Cook, A. Adoutte, M. Akam, S. B. Carroll, and G. Balavoine. 1999. Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature 399:772-776.
5. Ferrier, D. E. K., and P. W. H. Holland. 2001. Ancient origin of the Hox gene cluster. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:33-38.
6. Ferrier, D. E. K., and C. Minguillon. 2003. Evolution of the Hox/ParaHox gene clusters. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47:605-611.
7. Finnerty, J. R., and M. Q. Martindale. 1999. Ancient origins of axial patterning genes: Hox genes and ParaHox genes in the Cnidaria. Evol. Dev. 1:16-23.
8. Garcia-Fernandez, J. 2005. Hox, ParaHox, ProtoHox: Facts and guesses. Heredity 94:145-152.
9. Gascuel, O., M. D. Hendy, A. Jean-Marie, and R. McLachlan. 2003. The combinatorics of tandem duplication trees. Syst. Biol. 52:110-118.
10. Gellon, G., and W. McGinnis. 1998. Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution by modulation of Hox expression patterns. Bioessays 20:116-125.
11. Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
12. Goldman, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
13. Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-704.
14. Guindon, S., F. Lethiec, P. Duroux, and O. Gascuel. 2005. PHYML online - A Web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:W557-W559.
15. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
16. Hughes, C. L., and T. C. Kaufman. 2002. Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evol. Dev. 4:459-499.
17. Hurvich, C. M., and C. L. Tsai. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
18. Jones, D. T., W. R. Taylor, and J. M. Thornton. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:275-282.
19. Kourakis, M. J., and M. Q. Martindale. 2000. Combined-method phylogenetic analysis of Hox and paraHox genes of the metazoa. J. Exp. Zool. 288:175-191.
20. Lartillot, N., and H. Philippe. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1095-1109.
21. Martinez, P., and C. T. Amemiya. 2002. Genomics of the HOX gene cluster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 133:571-580.
22. Minguillon, C., and J. Garcia-Fernandez. 2003. Genesis and evolution of the Evx and Mox genes and the extended Hox and ParaHox gene clusters. Genome Biol. 4:R12.
23. Pagel, M., and A. Meade. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167:808-825.
24. Raftery, A. E. 1996. Hypothesis testing and model selection. Pages 163-188 in Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. (W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, eds.). Chapman & Hall, London.
25. Rambaut, A. 1996. SE-AL: Sequence alignment editor. Oxford, Evolutionary Biology Group, University of Oxford.
26. Rambaut, A., and A. J. Drummond. 2003. Tracer version 1.3. Oxford, Evolutionary Biology Group, University of Oxford.
27. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
28. Ryan, J. F., M. E. Mazza, K. Pang, D. Q. Matus, A. D. Baxevanis, M. Q. Martindale, and J. R. Finnerty. 2007. Pre-Bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: Evidence from the Sea Anemone, Nematostella vectensis. PLoS ONE 2:e153.
29. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinnauer, Sunderland, Massachussetts.
30. Wagner, G. P., C. Amemiya, and F. Ruddle. 2003. Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:14603-14606.
31. Whelan, S., and N. Goldman. 2001. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:691-699.
32. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:555-556.