A longitudinal study of the Salmonella status on Ontario swine farms within the time period 2001-2006

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 579-588

  Farzan, Abdolvahab ^a   Friendship, Robert M ^a   Dewey, Catherine E ^a   Poppe, Cornelis ^b   Funk, Julie ^c   Muckle, Catherine A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIOPHAGE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CANADA; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PIG FARMING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SEROTYPE;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BACTERIOPHAGE TYPING; FECES; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; ONTARIO; PREVALENCE; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; SEROTYPING; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SUIDAE;

EID: 53849109932     PISSN: 15353141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2007.0074     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson ES, Ward LR, Saxe MJ, and de Sa JD. Bacteriophage-typing designations of Salmonella Typhimurium. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 1977;78:297-300.
2. Argesti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2002:181-182.
3. Arnold ME, Cook A, and Davies R. A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs. J. R. Soc. Interface 2005;2:365-372.
4. Berends BR, Van Knapen F, Mossel DA, Burt SA, and Snijders JM. Impact on human health of Salmonella spp. on pork in the Netherlands and the anticipated effects of some currently proposed control strategies. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998;44:219-229.
5. Borch E, Nesbakken T, and Christensen H. Hazard identification in swine slaughter with respect to foodborne bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996;30:9-25.
6. Bowman C, Flint J, and Pollari F. Canadian integrated surveillance report: Salmonella, Campylobacter, pathogenic E. coli and Shigella, from 1996 to 1999. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 2003;29:1-32. Available at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/03vol29sl/index.html.
7. Callow BR. A new phage-typing scheme for Salmonella Typhimurium. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 1959;57:346-359.
8. Champagne MJ, Ravel A, and Daignault D. A comparison of sample weight and culture methods for the detection of Salmonella in pig feces. J. Food Prot. 2005;68:1073-1076.
9. Christensen J and Gardner IA. Herd-level interpretation of test results for epidemiologic studies of animal diseases. Prev. Vet. Med. 2000;45:83-106.
10. Davies PR, Turkson PK, Funk JA, Nichols MA, Ladely SR, and Fedorka-Cray PJ. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000;89:169-177.
11. Demczuk W, Ahmed R, Woodward D, Ahmed R, Clark C, Tabor H, Dore K, Ciampa N, and Muckle A. Laboratory Surveillance Data for Enteric Pathogens in Canada. Annual Summary 2002 and 2003. Available at http://www.nml-lnm.gc.ca/english/ NESP.htm. Winnipeg, MB: Public Health Agency of Canada, 2005:6-89. Last accessed June 10, 2008.
12. Demczuk W, Ahmed R, Woodward D, Clark C, Ng LK, Dore K, Ciampa N, and Muckle A. Laboratory Surveillance Data for Enteric Pathogens in Canada. Annual Summary 2001. Available at http://www.nml-lnm.gc.ca/english/NESP.htm. Winnipeg, MB: Public Health Agency of Canada, 2004:3-45. Last accessed June 10, 2008.
13. Demczuk W, Ahmed R, Woodward D, Clark C, and Rodgers F. Laboratory Surveillance Data for Enteric Pathogens in Canada. Annual Summary 1999. Available at http://www.nml-lnm.gc.ca/english/NESP.htm. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Public Health Agency of Canada, 2002:7-52. Last accessed June 10, 2008.
14. Demczuk W, Ahmed R, Woodward D, et al. Laboratory Surveillance Data for Enteric Pathogens in Canada. Annual Summary 2000. Available at http://www.nmllnm.gc.ca/english/NESP.htm. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Public Health Agency of Canada, 2001:4-45. Last accessed June 10, 2008.
15. Dohoo I, Martin W, and Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. AVC Inc., Charlestown, Prince Edward Island, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada, 2003:373-389.
16. Ewing WH. Serologic identification of Salmonella. In: Ewing WH (ed.) Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. 4th edition. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., 1986:201-238.
17. Friendship RM, Dewey CE, and Blackwell T. The Ontario Swine Sentinel Herd Project. Proceeding of the 21st Annual Centralia Swine Research Update. Kirkton, Ontario, 2002:18-19. Available at http://www.centraliaswineresearch.ca/ proceedings2002.html. Last accessed June 10, 2008.
18. Funk JA, Davies PR, and Nichols MA. The effect of fecal sample weight on detection of Salmonella enterica in swine feces. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2000;12:412-418.
19. Funk JA, Davies PR, and Nichols MA. Longitudinal study of Salmonella enterica in growing pigs reared in multiple-site swine production systems. Vet. Microbiol. 2001;83:45-60.
20. Hurd HS, McKean JD, Griffith RD, and Rostagno MH. Estimation of the Salmonella enterica prevalence in finishing swine. Epidemiol. Infect. 2004;132:127-135.
21. Jordan D. Aggregate testing for the evaluation of Johne's disease herd status. Aust. Vet. J. 1996;73:16-19.
22. Khakhria R, Woodward D, Johnson WM, and Poppe C. Salmonella isolated from humans, animals and other sources in Canada, 1983-92. Epidemiol. Infect. 1997;119:15-23.
23. Kranker S, Alban L, Boes J, and Dahl J. Longitudinal study of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium infection in three Danish farrow-to-finish swine herds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:2282-2288.
24. Lee MB and Middleton D. Enteric illness in Ontario, Canada, from1997 to 2001. J. Food Prot. 2003;66:953-961.
25. Le Minor L and Popoff MY. Antigenic Formulas of the Salmonella Serovars. 8th ed. Paris: WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella, 2001.
26. Mousing J, Jensen PT, Halgaard C, Bager F, Feld N, Nielsen B, Nielsen JP, and Bech-Nielsen S. Nation-wide Salmonella enterica surveillance and control in Danish slaughter swine herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 1997;29:247-261.
27. Pangloli P, Dje Y, Oliver SP, Mathew A, Golden DA, Taylor WJ, and Draughon FA. Evaluation of methods for recovery of Salmonella from dairy cattle, poultry, and swine farms. J. Food Prot. 2003;66:1987-1995.
28. Quirke AM, Leonard N, Kelly G, Egan J, Lynch PB, Rowe T, and Quinn PJ. Prevalence of Salmonella serotypes on pig carcasses from high- and low-risk herds slaughtered in three abattoirs. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 2001;114:360-362.
29. Rostagno MH, Gailey JK, Hurd HS, Mckean JD, and Leite RC. Culture methods differ on the isolation of Salmonella enterica serotypes from naturally contaminated swine fecal samples. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2005;17:80-83.
30. Shipp CR and Rowe B. A mechanised microtechnique for Salmonella serotyping. J. Clin. Pathol. 1980;33:595-597.
31. Swanenburg M, Urlings HA, Snijders JM, Keuzenkamp DA, and van Knapen F. Salmonella in slaughter pigs: prevalence, serotypes and critical control points during slaughter in two slaughterhouses. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001;70:243-254.
32. van Winsen RL, van Nes A, Keuzenkamp D, Urlings HA, Lipman LJ, Biesterveld S, Snijders JM, Verheijden JH, and van Knapen F. Monitoring of transmission of Salmonella enterica serovars in pigs using bacteriological and serological detection methods. Vet. Microbiol. 2001;80:267-274.
33. Zhang X, McEwen B, Mann E, and Martin W. Detection of clusters of Salmonella in animals in Ontario from 1991 to 2001. Can. Vet. J. 2005;46:517-519, 522-523.