Assessing genuine parents-offspring trios for genetic association studies

Human Heredity

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 26-37

  Teo, Yik Y ^a   Fry, Andrew E ^a   Sanjoaquin, Miguel A ^a   Pederson, Bonnie ^c   Small, Kerrin S ^a   Rockett, Kirk A ^a   Kwiatkowski, Dominic P ^a,b   Clark, Taane G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Genotyping error; Pedigree inconsistency; Relationship misspecification

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ALLELE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; EVALUATION; FAMILIAL DISEASE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; NUCLEAR FAMILY; PARENT OFFSPRING TRIO; PEDIGREE; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PARENTS; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 53849086543     PISSN: 00015652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000164396     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium: Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2007;447:661-678.
2. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Menozzi P, Piazza A: The history and geography of human genes. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.
3. Reich DE, Goldstein DB: Detecting association in a case-control study while correcting for population stratification. Genet Epidemiol 2001;20:4-16.
4. Freedman ML, Reich D, Penney KL, McDonald GJ, Mignault AA, Patterson N, Gabriel SB, Topol EJ, Smoller JW, Pato CN, Pato MT, Petryshen TL, Kolonel LN, Lander ES, Sklar P, Henderson B, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D: Assessing the impact of population stratification on genetic association studies. Nat Genet 2004;36:388-393.
5. Marchini J, Cardon LR, Phillips MS, Donnelly P: The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies. Nat Genet 2004;36:512-517.
6. Helgason A, Yngvadóttir B, Hrafnkelsson B, Gulcher J, Stefánsson K: An Icelandic example of the impact of population structure on association studies. Nat Genet 2005;37:90-95.
7. Laird NM, Lange C: Family-based designs in the age of large-scale gene-association studies. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:385-394.
8. Falk CT, Rubinstein P: Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 1987;51:227-233.
9. Thomson G: Mapping disease genes: family-based association studies. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:487-498.
10. Terwilliger JD, Ott J: A haplotype-based 'haplotype relative risk' approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 1992;42:337-346.
11. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ: Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:506-516.
12. Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT: A log-linear approach to case-parent-triad data: assessing effects of disease genes that act either directly or through maternal effects and that may be subject to parental imprinting. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:969-978.
13. Laird NM, Horvath S, Xu X: Implementing a unified approach to family-based tests of association. Genet Epidemiol 2000;19:S36-S42.
14. Cordell HJ, Clayton DG: A unified stepwise regression procedure for evaluating the relative effects of polymorphisms within a gene using case/control or family data: application to HLA in type 1 diabetes. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:124-141.
15. Ewens WJ, Spielman RS: The transmission/disequilibrium test: history, subdivision, and admixture. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:455-464.
16. Bellis MA, Hughes K, Hughes S, Ashton JR: Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:749-754.
17. Cerda-Flores RM, Barton SA, Marty-Gonzalex LF, Rivas F, Chakraborty R: Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers. Am J Phys Anthropol 1999;109:281-293.
18. Gordon D, Matise TC, Heath SC, Ott J: Power loss for multiallelic transmission/disequilibrium test when errors introduced: GAW11 simulated data. Genet Epidemiol 1999;17:S587-S592.
19. Heath SC: A bias in TDT due to undetected genotyping errors. Am J Hum Genet Suppl 1998;63:A292.
20. Mitchell AA, Cutler DJ, Chakravarti A: Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:598-610.
21. Gordon D, Heath SC, Liu X, Ott J: A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69:371-380.
22. Gordon D, Haynes C, Johnnidis C, Patel SB, Bowcock AM, Ott J: A transmission disequilibrium test for general pedigrees that is robust to the presence of random genotyping errors and any number of untyped parents. Eur J Hum Genet 2004;12:752-761.
23. Gordon D, Heath SC, Ott J: True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered 1999;49:65-70.
24. Blouin MS, Parsons M, Lacaille V, Lotz S: Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol Ecol 1996;5:393-401.
25. Boehnke M, Cox NJ: Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet 1997;61:423-429.
26. Broman KW, Weber JL: Estimation of pairwise relationships in the presence of genotyping errors. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63:1563-1564.
27. Lynch M, Ritland K: Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 1999;152:1753-1766.
28. Epstein MP, Duren WL, Boehnke M: Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals. Am J Hum Genet 2000;67:1219-1231.
29. Sieberts SK, Wijsman EM, Thompson EA: Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:170-180.
30. Wang J: An estimator of pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 2002;160:1203-1215.
31. Blouin MS: DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 2003;18:503-511.
32. Jones AG, Ardren WR: Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol 2003;12:2511-2523.
33. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (eds): Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London, Chapman & Hall, 1996.
34. Leal SM, Yan K, Müller-Myhsok B: SimPed: A simulation program to generate haplotype and genotype data for pedigree structures. Hum Hered 2005;60:119-122.
35. McPeek M, Sun L: Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:1076-1094.
36. Duren WL, Epstein M, Li M, Boehnke M: RELPAIR: A Program That Infers the Relationships of Pairs of Individuals Based on Marker Data. Version 2.0.1, http://csg.sph.umich.edu/boehnke/relpair.php, 2004.
37. International HapMap Consortium: A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 2005;437:1299-1320.