True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms

Human Heredity

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 65-70

  Gordon, Derek ^a   Heath, Simon C ^a   Ott, Jürg ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Haplotype relative risk sampling; Pedigree errors; Probability theory; Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; DNA POLYMORPHISM; ERROR; GENE FREQUENCY; PEDIGREE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032992242     PISSN: 00015652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000022846     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Risch N, Merikangas K: The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996;273:516-1517.
2. Falk CT, Rubinstein P: Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 1987;51:227-233.
3. Ott J: Statistical properties of the haplotype relative risk. Genet Epidemiol 1989;6:127-130.
4. Thomson G: Mapping disease genes: Family-based association studies. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:487-498.
5. Terwilliger JD, Ott J: A haplotype-based 'haplotype relative risk' approach to detecting allelic associations. Hum Hered 1992;42:337-346.
6. Spielman RS, Ewens WJ: The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59: 983-989.
7. Collins FS, Guyer MS, Charkravarti A: Variations on a theme: Cataloging human DNA sequence variation. Science 1997;278:1580-1581.
8. Hogg RV, Craig AT: Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. New York, Macmillan, 1978.
9. Terwilliger JD, Ott J: Handbook of Human Genetic Linkage. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
10. Ott J: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1991.
11. Hungerford TW: Algebra. New York, Springer, 1984.