Changes in the mucoadhesion of powder formulations after drug application investigated with a simplified method

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 97, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 3855-3864

  Fransén, Nelly ^a   Björk, Erik ^a   Edsman, Katarina ^a,b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Q Med AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

In vitro models; Microparticles; Mucoadhesion; Mucosal drug delivery; Nasal drug delivery; Powder technology; Residence time; Texture analyzer

Indexed keywords

MUCIN; STARCH GLYCOLATE SODIUM;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG FORMULATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MUCOADHESION; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE MUCOSA; PARTICLE SIZE; POWDER; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; WATER ABSORPTION;

EID: 53549083779     PISSN: 00223549     EISSN: 15206017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21279     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ilium L, Jorgensen H, Bisgaard H, Krogsgaard O, Rossing N. 1987. Bioadhesive microspheres as a potential nasal drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 39:189-199.
2. Callens C, Remon JP. 2000. Evaluation of starch-maltodextrin-Carbopol 974 P mixtures for the nasal delivery of insulin in rabbits. J Control Release 66:215-220.
3. Schipper NG, Verhoef JC, Merkus FW. 1991. The nasal mucociliary clearance: Relevance to nasal drug delivery. Pharm Res 8:807-814.
4. Smart JD. 2005. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:1556-1568.
5. Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. 1993. An investigation into the role of water movement and mucus gel dehydration in mucoadhesion. J Control Release 25:197-203.
6. Edsman K, Hägerström H. 2005. Pharmaceutical applications of mucoadhesion for the non-oral routes. J Pharm Pharmacol 57:3-22.
7. Hägerström H, Edsman K. 2001. Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength method. J Pharm Pharmacol 53:1589-1599.
8. Hägerström H. 2003. Polymer gels as pharmaceutical dosage forms. Department of pharmacy. Uppsala: Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University.
9. Jacques Y, Buri P. 1997. An investigation of the physical behaviour of moisture-activated mucoadhesive hydrogels upon contact with biological and non-biological substrates. Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae 72:225-232.
10. Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. 1995. An investigation of some factors influencing the in vitro assessment of mucoadhesion. Int J Pharm 116:223-230.
11. Fransén N, Björk E, Nyström C. 2007. Development and characterisation of interactive mixtures with a fine-particulate mucoadhesive carrier for nasal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 67:370-376.
12. Bredenberg S, Nyström C. 2003. In-vitro evaluation of bioadhesion in particulate systems and possible improvement using interactive mixtures. J Pharm Pharmacol 55:169-177.
13. Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. 1994. An in-vitro method for assessing the duration of mucoadhesion. J Control Release 31:207-212.
14. Johansson B, Nicklasson F, Alderborn G. 1998. Effect of pellet size on degree of deformation and densification during compression and on compact-ability of microcrystalline cellulose pellets. Int J Pharm 163:35-48.
15. Tunon A, Alderborn G. 2001. Granule deformation and densification during compression of binary mixtures of granules. Int J Pharm 222:65-76.
16. Eriksson M, Nyström C, Alderborn G. 1993. The use of air permeametry for the assessment of external surface area and sphericity of pelletized granules. Int J Pharm 99:197-207.
17. Nyström C, Mazur J, Sjögren J. 1982. Studies on direct compression of tablets II The influence of the particle size of a dry binder on the mechanical strength of tablets. Int J Pharm 10:209-218.
18. Kaye BH. 1967. Permeability techniques for characterizing fine powders. Powder Technol 1:11-22.
19. Alderborn G, Duberg M, Nyström C. 1985. Studies on direct compression of tablets X. Measurement of tablet surface area by permeametry. Powder Technol 41:49-56.
20. Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF, Zijlstra HT, de Boer AH. 1975. Film formation by magnesium stéarate during mixing and its effect on tabletting. Pharmaceu-tisch Weekblad 110:317-325.
21. Williams JC. 1968. The mixing of dry powders. Powder Technol 2:13-20.
22. Wadell C, Bjork E, Camber O. 1999. Nasal drug delivery - Evaluation of an in vitro model using porcine nasal mucosa. Eur J Pharm Sci 7:197-206.
23. Caramella C, Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, Ferrari F. 1994. Rheological and tensile tests for the assessment of polymer-mucin interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 40:213-217.
24. Leung S-HS, Robinson JR. 1988. The contribution of anionic polymer structural features to mucoadhesion. J Control Release 5:223-231.
25. Carlstedt I, Sheehan JK, Corfield AP, Gallagher JT. 1985. Mucous glycoproteins: A gel of a problem. Essays Biochem 20:40-76.
26. Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Ferrari F, Bertoni M, Caramella C. 1996. Characterization of mucin interaction with three viscosity grades of sodium carboxymethylcellulose. Comparison between rheological and tensile testing. Eur J Pharm Sci 4:189-196.
27. Westerberg M, Nyström C. 1993. Physicochemical aspects of drug release XVII. The effect of drug surface area coverage to carrier materials on drug dissolution from ordered mixtures. Int J Pharm 90:1-17.
28. Bolhuis GK, van Kamp HV, Lerk CF, Sessink FGM. 1982. On the mechanism of action of modern disintegrants. Acta Pharm Technol 28:111-114.