Responsiveness of the French version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (F-DASH) in patients with orthopaedic and medical shoulder disorders

Joint Bone Spine

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 579-584

  Fayad, Fouad ^a   Lefevre Colau, Marie Martine ^b,e   Macé, Yann ^a   Gautheron, Vincent ^c,e   Fermanian, Jacques ^d   Roren, Alexandra ^a   Roby Brami, Agnès ^e   Revel, Michel ^a,e   Poiraudeau, Serge ^a,e  

^a Cochin Hospital ^*  (France)

^b Paris Descartes University   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^d HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

^e University Paris Descartes   (France)

Author keywords

DASH questionnaire; Disability; Outcome measure; Responsiveness; Shoulder

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTEROID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BURSITIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRENCH VERSION OF THE DISABILITY OF THE ARM SHOULDER AND HAND DISABILITY/SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE; FROZEN SHOULDER; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER DISORDER; SHOULDER PAIN; TENDINITIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDICS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SHOULDER; SHOULDER FRACTURES; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 53149105560     PISSN: 1297319X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med 29 (1996) 602-608
2. Bot S.D., Terwee C.B., van der Windt D.A., et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 63 (2004) 335-341
3. Atroshi I., Gummesson C., Andersson B., et al. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71 (2000) 613-618
4. Rosales R.S., Delgado E.B., and Diez de la Lastra-Bosch I. Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg 27A (2002) 334-343
5. Offenbaecher M., Ewert T., Sangha O., et al. Validation of a German version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol 29 (2002) 401-402
6. Veehof M.M., Sleegers E.J., van Veldhoven N.H., et al. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther 15 (2002) 347-354
7. Padua R., Padua L., Ceccarelli E., et al. Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg 28B (2003) 179-186
8. Liang H.W., Wang H.K., Yao G., et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. J Formos Med Assoc 103 (2004) 773-779
9. Imaeda T., Toh S., Nakao Y., et al. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 10 (2005) 353-359
10. Lee E.W., Chung M.M., Li A.P., et al. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). J Hand Surg 30B (2005) 29-34
11. Orfale A.G., Araujo P.M., Ferraz M.B., et al. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 38 (2005) 293-302
12. Themistocleous G.S., Goudelis G., Kyrou I., et al. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). J Hand Ther 19 (2006) 350-357
13. Dubert T., Voche P., Dumontier C., et al. The DASH questionnaire. French translation of a trans-cultural adaptation. Chir Main 20 (2001) 294-302
14. Fayad F., Lefevre-Colau M.M., Macé Y., et al. Validation of the French version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (F-DASH). Joint Bone Spine 75 (2008) 195-200
15. Lefevre-Colau M.M., Babinet A., Fayad F., et al. Immediate mobilization compared with conventional immobilization for the impacted nonoperatively treated proximal humeral fracture. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 2582-2590
16. Muller M.E., Nazarian S., Koch P., et al. The comprehensive classification of 23 fractures of the long bones (1990), Springer-Verlag, New York
17. Constant C.R., and Murley A.H.G. A clinical method for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214 (1987) 160-164
18. Fortin P.R., Stucki G., and Katz J.N. Measuring relevant change: an emerging challenge in rheumatologic clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 38 (1995) 1027-1030
19. Husted J.A., Cook R.J., Farewell V.T., et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53 (2000) 459-468
20. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Katz J.N., et al. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 54 (2001) 1204-1217
21. Fermanian J. Measuring agreement between 2 observers: a quantitative case. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 32 (1984) 408-413
22. Beaton D.E., Katz J.N., Fossel A.H., et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14 (2001) 128-146
23. Gay R.E., Amadio P.C., and Johnson J.C. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am] 28 (2003) 250-254
24. Greenslade J.R., Mehta R.L., Belward P., et al. DASH and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?. J Hand Surg [Br] 29 (2004) 159-164
25. Gummesson C., Atroshi I., and Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4 (2003) 11
26. van der Windt D.A., van der Heijden G.J., de Winter A.F., et al. The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 57 (1998) 82-87
27. Paul A., Lewis M., Shadforth M.F., et al. A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 63 (2004) 1293-1299