Revision rates after primary hip and knee replacement in England between 2003 and 2006

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1398-1407

  Sibanda, Nokuthaba ^a,b   Copley, Lynn P ^b   Lewsey, Jim D ^b,c   Borroff, Mick ^d   Gregg, Paul ^e   MacGregor, Alex J ^f   Pickford, Martin ^g   Porter, Martyn ^h   Tucker, Keith ⁱ   Van Der Meulen, Jan H ^a,b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^d Synthes Technical Center   (United Kingdom)

^e SOUTH TEES HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^g Northgate Information Solutions   (United Kingdom)

^h Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; REOPERATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UNITED KINGDOM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; WALES;

EID: 53149087865     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050179     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54: 61-76.
2. Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, Ilstrup DM (1974) 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. A study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56: 273-84.
3. Ranawat CS, Sculco JP (1985) History of the development of total knee prosthesis at the Hospital for Special Surgery. In: Ranawat CS, editor. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. New York, Springer-Verlag.
4. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 4th Annual Report (2007) NJR Centre. Available: www.njrcentre.org.uk/documents/reports/annual/4th/ 4736_NJR_Annual%20Report_WEB.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2008.
5. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2007) Available: http://orthoinfo.aaos.org. Accessed 9 August 2007.
6. Huo MH, Parvizi J, Gilbert NF (2006) What's new in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 2100-2113.
7. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2004) Metal on metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 177-184.
8. Treacy RBC, Shetty VD, Villar RN (2006) Controversial topics in surgery. To resurface or replace the hip in the under 65-year-old. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88: 349-353.
9. Griffin TT (2005) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Adelaide, South Australia: Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical (ASERNIP-S).
10. Archibeck MJ, White RE (2004) What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 1839-1849.
11. Slover J, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, et al. (2006) Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 2348-2355.
12. Department of Orthopaedics Faculty of Medicine, Göteborg University. Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register (2005) Available: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se. Accessed 9 August 2007.
13. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (2006) Available: http://www.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page= services_cjrr_e. Accessed 9 August 2007.
14. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2006) Report 2006. Available: http://www.haukeland.no/nrl/Report2006.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2007.
15. Australian Orthopaedic Association (2006) National Joint Replacement Registry, Annual Report 2006. Available: https://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/ aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport_2006.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2007.
16. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Registry (2007) Seven Year Report, January 1999 to December 2005. Available: http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/ NJR/reports/7-year-report-master.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2007.
17. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (2006) Annual Report 2006. Available: http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/ 107_SKAR2006_Englv2.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2007.
18. Finnish Arthroplasty Register (2004) The 2004 Implant Yearbook on Orthopaedic Endoprostheses. Available: http://www.nam.fi/english/publications. Accessed 4 September 2007.
19. National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2007) What is the National Joint Registry. Available: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/healthcarepro/about.htm. Accessed 9 August 2007.
20. Hardoon SL, Lewsey JD, Gregg PJ, Reeves BC, Van der Meulen JH (2006) Continuous monitoring of joint prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 716-720.
21. National Health Service Information Centre (2007) Hospital episode statistics. Available: http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk. Accessed 9 August 2007.
22. NHS Connecting for Health. Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys - Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures - 4th Revision (2007) Available: http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/data/ clinicalcoding/classifications/opcs_4. Accessed 9 August 2007.
23. NHS Connecting for Health (1994) Clinical Coding Newsletter. Coding Joint Procedures. Classification Department IMG F. Available: http://www. connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/data/clinicalcoding/ publications/newsletters. Accessed 9 August 2007.
24. NHS Connecting for Health (1996) Clinical Coding Newsletter. Amendments to ICD-10 Alphabetical Index. Classification Department IMG F. Available: http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/data/clinicalcoding/ publications/newsletters. Accessed 9 August 2007.
25. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley.
26. Johnsen SP, Sorensen HT, Lucht U, Soballe KOvergaard et al. (2006) Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short- and long-terms. A nationwide Danish follow-up study including 36,984 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 1303-1308.
27. National Joint Registry (2007) Operations included in NJR Minimum Dataset version 2 (MDS v2). Available: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/documents/mds/ Operations_included_MDS%20v2.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2007.
28. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Final appraisal determination metal on metal hip resurfacing (2002) Available: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=30712. Accessed 9 August 2007.
29. Mont MA, Raglan PS Etienne G, Seyler TM, Schmalzried T (2006) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14: 454-463.
30. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, et al. (2007) Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 22: 66-71.
31. Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinene P, Reme V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop 78: 128-135.
32. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five year results of a prospective, randomised trial for 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80: 862-865.
33. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, et al. (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367: 50-60.
34. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89: 893-900.
35. Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM (2007) Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 78: 315-326.
36. NHS Supply Chain (2007) Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel. Available: http://www.supplychain.nhs.uk/portal/page/portal/Medical%20Equipment/ Orthopaedics/Hip%20prosthesis/ODEP%20database. Accessed 9 August 2007.
37. Hardoon SL, Lewsey JD, van der Meulen JH (2007) Continuous monitoring of long-term outcomes with application to hip prostheses. Stat Med 26: 5081-5099.