Continuous monitoring of long-term outcomes with application to hip prostheses

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 28, 2007, Pages 5081-5099

  Hardoon, Sarah L ^a,c   Lewsey, James D ^a,b   van der Meulen, Jan H P ^a,b  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Continuous monitoring; CUSUM; Hip prostheses; Simulation; Weibull

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIP PROSTHESIS; LIFESPAN; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PRODUCT SURVEILLANCE, POSTMARKETING; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 36349016113     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2900     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 2nd Annual Report. 2005. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk (1 October 2005).
2. Post-market surveillance of CE marked joint replacement implants including guidance to manufacturers on post-market clinical studies. 2000. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bi/documents/publication/ con007529.pdf (1 March 2005).
3. Friede T, Henderson R. Intervention effects in observational studies with an application in total hip replacements. Statistics in Medicine 2003; 22:3725-3737 (DOI: 10.1002/sim.1681).
4. Rogers CA, Reeves BC, Caputo M, Ganesh JS, Bonser RS et al. Control chart methods for monitoring cardiac surgical performance and their interpretation. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2004; 128:811-819 (DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.03.011).
5. Grigg OA, Farewell VT, Spiegelhalter DJ. Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2003; 12:147-170 (DOI: 10.1191/ 0962280203sm323ra).
6. Poloniecki J, Sismanidis C, Bland M, Jones P. Retrospective cohort study of false alarm rates associated with a series of heart operations: the case for hospital mortality monitoring groups. British Medical Journal 2004; 328(7436):375-379 (DOI: 10.1136/ bmj.37956.520567.44).
7. Marshall C, Best N, Bottle A, Aylin P. Statistical issues in the prospective monitoring of health outcomes across multiple units. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 2004; 167(Part 3):541-559.
8. Burns CM, Bennett CJ, Myers CT, Ward M. The use of cusum analysis in the early detection and management of hospital bed occupancy crises. Medical Journal of Australia 2005; 183(6):291-294.
9. Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT. Risk-adjusted monitoring of binary surgical outcomes. Outcomes Research 2001; 21(3):163-169.
10. The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Investigation of the performance of the 3M Capital Hip System. 2001. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/ publications/docs/investigation_3m_capital_hip.html (1 March 2005).
11. Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Annual Report 2004: The Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. 2005. http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/ (1 September 2006).
12. Fender D, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Outcome of Charnley total hip replacement across a single heath region in England: the results at five years from a regional hip register. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) 1999; 81:577-581.
13. Soderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica Supplementum 2000; 71(296):1-33.
14. Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Johnell O. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. Journal of Arthroplasty 2000; 15(7):884-889.
15. Collett D. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. Chapman & Hall: London, 1994.
16. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) 1993; 75-B:697-704.
17. Retpen JB, Vanmarken J, Jensen JS. Survivorship analysis of failure pattern after revision total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 1989; 4(4):311-317.
18. Wald A. Sequential Analysis. Wiley: New York, 1947.