Learning via direct and mediated instruction by deaf students

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 546-561

  Marschark, Marc ^a,b,c   Sapere, Patricia ^a   Convertino, Carol ^a   Pelz, Jeff ^d  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^d ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SIGN LANGUAGE; SPEECH; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ADULT; DEAFNESS; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LEARNING; NEGOTIATING; PEER GROUP; SIGN LANGUAGE; SPEECH; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 52649121395     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enn014     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Antia, S. (2007). Can deaf and hard of hearing students be successful in general education classrooms? Retrieved May 17, 2007, from www.tcrecord.org/PrintContent.asp?ContentID=13461
2. Bellugi, U., & Fischer, S. (1972). A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition, 1, 173-200.
3. Cokely, D. (1990). The effectiveness of three means of communication in the college classroom. Sign Language Studies, 69, 415-439.
4. Davis, J. E. (2005). Code choices and consequences: Implications for educational interpreting. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 112-141). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Detterman, D. K., & Thompson, L. A. (1997). What is so special about special education? American Psychologist, 52, 1082-1090.
6. Fleischer, L. R. (1975). Language interpretation under four interpreting conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.
7. Harrington, E (2000). Sign language interpreters and access for deaf students to university curricula: The ideal and the reality In R. P. Roberts, S. E. Carr, D. Abraham, & A. Dufour (Eds.), The critical link 2: Interpreters in the community (pp. 219 273). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
8. Hauser, P. C., Lukomski, J., & Hillman, T. (in press). Development of deaf and hard-of-hearing students' executive function. In M. Marschark & P. C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Hurwitz, T A. (2007). NTID Annual Report, 2007. Rochester, NY: Rochester Institute of Technology.
10. Hyde, M. B., & Power, D. J. (1992). The receptive communication abilities of deaf students under oral, manual and combined methods. American Annals of the Deaf, 137, 389-398.
11. Jacobs, L. R. (1977). The efficiency of interpreting input for processing lecture information by deaf college students. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 11, 10-14.
12. Jelinek Lewis, M. S., & Jackson, D. W. (2001). Television literacy: Comprehension of program content using closed-captions for the deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 43-53.
13. Johnson, R. E., Liddell, S. K., & Erting, C. J. (1989). Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University. (Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper 89-3).
14. Jones, B. E. (2005). Competencies of K-12 educational interpreters: What we need versus what we have. In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed (pp. 113-131). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
15. Kurz, K. B. (2004). A comparison of deaf children's learning in direct communication versus an interpreted environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
16. Lang, H. G. (2002). Higher education for deaf students: Research priorities in the new millennium. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 267-280.
17. Lang, H. G., McKee, B. G., & Conner, K. N. (1993). Characteristics of effective teachers: A descriptive study of perceptions of faculty and deaf college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 252-259.
18. Livingston, S., Singer, B., & Abramson, T (1994). A study to determine the effectiveness of two different kinds of interpreting. Proceedings of the Tenth National Convention of the Conference of Interpreter Trainers - Mapping our course: A collaborative venture (pp. 175-197). Sacramento, CA: CIT.
19. Marmor, G., & Petitto, L. (1979). Simultaneous communication in the classroom: How well is English grammar represented? Sign Language Studies, 23, 99-136.
20. Marschark, M., Convertino, C., & LaRock, D. (2006). Optimizing academic performance of deaf students: Access, opportunities, and outcomes. In D. F. Moores & D. S. Martin (Eds.), Deaf learners: New developments in curriculum and instruction (pp. 179-200). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
21. Marschark, M., Leigh, G., Sapere, P, Burnham, D., Convertino, C., Stinson, M., et al. (2006). Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives to classroom learning by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 421-437.
22. Marschark, M., Pelz, J., Convertino, C., Sapere, P, Arndt, M. E., & Seewagen, R. (2005). Classroom interpreting and visual information processing in mainstream education for deaf students: Live or Memorex?® American Educational Research Journal, 42, 727-762.
23. Marschark, M., Rhoten, C., & Fabich, M. (2007). Effects of cochlear implants on children's reading and academic achievement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 269-282.
24. Marschark, M., Sapere, P, Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R. (2005a). Access to postsecondary education through sign language interpreting. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 38-50.
25. Marschark, M., Sapere, P, Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R. (2005b). Educational interpreting: Access and outcomes. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 57-83). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Marschark, M., Sapere, P, Convertino, C., Seewagen, R., & Maltzen, H. (2004). Comprehension of sign language interpreting: Deciphering a complex task situation. Sign Language Studies, 4, 345-368.
27. Marschark, M., & Wauters, L. (in press). Language comprehension and learning by deaf students. In M. Marschark & P. C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Murphy, H. J., & Fleischer, L. R. (1977). The effects of Ameslan versus Siglish upon test scores. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 11 15-18.
29. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Integrated post-secondary education data system, Fall Enrollment Data File, Fall 1997. Retrieved August 15, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/Ipeds/ ef9798/.
30. Newell, W. (1978). A study of the ability of day-class deaf adolescents to compare factual information using four communication modalities. American Annals of the Deaf, 123, 558-562.
31. Quinsland, L. K., & Long, G. (1989, March). Teaching, interpreting, and learning: Implications for mainstreaming hearing-impaired students Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
32. Richardson, J. T. E., Long, G. L., & Woodley, A. (2004). Students with an undisclosed hearing loss: A challenge for academic access, progress, and success? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 427-441.
33. Sapere, P., LaRock, D., Convertino, C., Gallimore, L., & Lessard, P. (2005). Sign Language interpreting and interpreter education - Adventures in Wonderland? In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. Winston (Eds.), Interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 283 297). New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Schick, B., Williams, K., & Bolster, L. (1999). Skill levels of educational interpreters working in public schools. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 144-155.
35. Seal, B. C. (2004). Best practices in educational interpreting (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
36. Stinson, M. S., Elliot, L. B., Kelly, R. R., & Liu, Y. (in press). Deaf and hard-of hearing students' memory of lectures with speech-to-text and interpreting/note taking services. Special Education.
37. Stinson, M. S., & Walter, G. G. (1997). Improving retention for deaf and hard of hearing students: What the research tells us. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 30, 14-23.
38. Winston, E. A. (2005). Interpretability and accessibility of mainstream classroom. In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.