Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A transatlantic comparison of techniques and outcomes

BJU International

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1113-1117

  Chammas Jr , Mario F ^a   Hubert, Jacques ^a   Patel, Vipul R ^b  

^a CHU NANCY BRABOIS   (France)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted; Kidney pelvis; Laparoscopy; Robotics; Surgery; Ureteric obstruction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER STENT; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORTH AMERICA; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 34247172915     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06739.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2001; 87: 287-9
2. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 2005; 95 (Suppl. 2): 102-5
3. Hubert J, Feuillu B, Mangin P, Lobontiu A, Artis M, Villemot JP. Laparoscopic computer-assisted pyeloplasty: the results of experimental surgery in pigs. BJU Int 2003; 92: 437-40
4. Poulakis V, Witzsch U, Schultheiss D, Rathert P, Becht E. [History of ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair (pyeloplasty). From Trendelenburg (1886) to the present]. Urologe A 2004; 43: 1544-59
5. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Plastic operation for hydronephrosis. Proc R Soc Med 1951; 44: 4-5
6. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-9
7. Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 2002; 168: 23-6
8. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 2002; 60: 39-45
9. Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology 1999; 53: 1099-103
10. Yohannes P, Burjonrappa SC. Rapid communication: laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robot: technical considerations. J Endourol 2003; 17: 79-83
11. Albani JM, Yost AJ, Streem SB. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: determining durability of endourological intervention. J Urol 2004; 171: 579-82
12. Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R et al. Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up. World J Urol 2003; 21: 133-8
13. Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 2002; 60: 509-13
14. Siddiq FM, Leveillee RJ, Villicana P, Bird VG. Computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: University of Miami experience with the daVinci Surgical System. J Endourol 2005; 19: 387-92
15. Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience. J Endourol 2005; 19: 382-6
16. Mendez-Torres F, Woods M, Thomas R. Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2005; 19: 393-6
17. Recker F, Subotic B, Goepel M, Tscholl R. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: preliminary report. J Urol 1995; 153: 1601-4
18. del Valle Gonzalez N, Estebanez Zarranz J, Conde Redondo C et al. [Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Our experience]. Arch Esp Urol 2004; 57: 1099-106
19. Salomon L, Sebe P, De la Taille A et al. Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: part I. BJU Int 2004; 94: 238-43