Computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: University of Miami experience with the daVinci™ surgical system

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 387-392

  Siddiq, Farjaad M ^a   Leveillee, Raymond J ^a   Villicana, Patrick ^a   Bird, Vincent G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICE; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PYELOPLASTY; RENOGRAPHY; ROBOTICS; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; FLORIDA; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPES; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 18544361912     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.387     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: An 8 year follow-up. J Urol 1993;149:453-456.
2. Ramsay JW, Miller RA, Kellett MJ, Blackford HN, Wickham JE, Whitfield HN. Percutaneous pyelolysis: Indications, complications and results. Br J Urol 1984;56:586-588.
3. Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Nakada SY, Babayan RK, Albala DM, Fuchs GJ, Smith AD. A multicenter clinical trial investigating the use of a fluoroscopically controlled cutting balloon catheter for the management of ureteral and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1997;157:1625-1629.
4. Thomas R, Monga M. Endopyelotomy: Retrograde ureteroscopic approach. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:305-310.
5. Bauer JJ, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, Chen RN, Iverson AJ, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999;162:692-695.
6. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256.
7. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, Deger S, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: The method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002;42:268-275.
8. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Kratzik C, Marberger MJ. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003;44:340-345.
9. Chenven ES, McGinnis D, Strup SE. The 3-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 2004;171:1050-1053.
10. Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the daVinci robotic system. Urology 2002;60:509-513.
11. Bentas W, Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Probst M, et al. DaVinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: Technique and 1 year follow-up. World J Urol 2003;21:133-138.
12. Yohannes P, Burjonrappa SC. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty using the da Vinci™ robot: Technical considerations. J Endourol 2003;17:79-83.
13. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, and Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-1799.
14. Ben Slama MR, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Initial experience in 15 cases. Urology 2000;56:45-48.
15. Soulie M, Thoulouzan M, Seguin P, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: Comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology 2001;57:443-447.
16. Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen JD. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2001;88:526-531.
17. Peschel R, Neururer R, Scheidel AP, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Long-term results. Eur Urol 2002;Suppl 1:58.
18. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: Initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002;42:453-457.
19. Clayman RV. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol 2003;170:691-692.
20. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJC, Mak S, et al. The long term results of Anderson-Hynes pyelolasty. BJU Int 2001;87:1-4.
21. O'Reilly PH, Aurell M, Britton K, et al. Consensus on diuresis renography for investigating the dilated upper urinary tract. J Nucl Med 1996;37:1872-1876.
22. O'Reilly PH, Consensus Committee of the Society of Radionuclides in Nephrourology. Standardization of the renogram technique for investigating the dilated upper urinary tract and assessing the results of surgery. BJU Int 2003;91:239-243.
23. Bretland PM. The single compartment model applied to the large renal pelvis: A preliminary study. Nucl Med Commun 1992;13:106-109.