Panel consonance in the sensory evaluation of apple attributes: Influence of mealiness on sweetness perception

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 656-670

  Echeverria G ^a   Graell, J ^a   Lara, I ^a   Lopez M L ^a   Puy, J ^b  

^a IRTA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LLEIDA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 52349102963     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00178.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ADDINSOFT SARL. 2006. XLSTAT Software, Version 2006.2, Addinsoft SARL, Paris, France.
2. BALDWIN, E.A., SCOTT, J.W., EINSTEIN, M.A., MALUNDO, T.M.M., CARR, B.T., SHEWFELT, R.L. TANDON, K.S. 1998. Relationship between sensory and instrumental analysis for tomato flavor. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 12, 906 915.
3. DAILLANT-SPINNLER, B., MACFIE, H.J.H., BEYTS, P.K. HEDDERLEY, D. 1996. Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples from the southern hemisphere. Food Qual. Prefer. 7, 113 126.
4. DEVER, M.C., CLIFF, M.A. HALL, J.W. 1995. Analysis of variation and multivariate relationships among analytical and sensory characteristics in whole apple evaluation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 69, 329 338.
5. DIJKSTERHUIS, G. 1995a. Assessing panel consensus. Food Qual. Prefer. 6, 7 11.
6. DIJKSTERHUIS, G. 1995b. Multivariate data analysis in sensory and consumer science: An overview of developments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 6, 206 211.
7. DIJKSTERHUIS, G. GOWER, J.C. 1991/2. The interpretation of the Generalized Procrustes Analysis and allied methods. Food Qual. Prefer. 3, 67 78.
8. ECHEVERRÍA, G., LARA, I., FUENTES, T., LÓPEZ, M.L., GRAELL, J. PUY, J. 2004. Assessment of relationships between sensory and instrumental quality of CA-stored "Fuji" apples by multivariate analysis. J. Food Sci. 69 (9 368 375.
9. HAMPSON, C.R. MCKENZIE, D.L. 2006. Sensory characteristics of 21 new apple cultivars after short-term cold air storage. J. Am. Pomolog. Soc. 60 (1 9 19.
10. HAMPSON, C.R., QUAMME, H.A. HALL, J.W. 2000. Using sensory evaluation panels to screen apple breeding selections. Acta Hortic. 538 (1 201 205.
11. HARKER, F.R. HALLETT, I.C. 1992. Physiological changes associated with development of mealiness of apple fruit during cool storage. HortScience 27, 1291 1294.
12. HARKER, F.R., GUNSON, A., BROOKFIELD, P.L. WHITE, A. 2002a. An apple a day: The influence of memory on consumer judgment of quality. Food Qual. Prefer. 13, 173 179.
13. HARKER, F.R., MAINDONALD, J., MURRAY, S.H., GUNSON, F.A., HALLETT, I.C. WALKER, S.B. 2002b. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: Texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24, 225 239.
14. HARKER, F.R., MARSH, K.B., YOUNG, H., MURRAY, S.H., GUNSON, F.A. WALKER, S.B. 2002c. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2: Sweet and acid taste of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24, 241 250.
15. HARKER, F.R., AMOS, R.L., ECHEVERRÍA, G. GUNSON, F.A. 2006. Influence of texture on taste: Insights gained during studies of hardness, juiciness and sweetness of apple fruit. J. Food Sci. 71 (2 77 82.
16. ISO. 1993. Sensory Analysis. General Guidance for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Assessors. Part 1. Selected Assessors. Standard No. 8586-1, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. KERMIT, M. LENGARD, V. 2005. Assessing the performance of a sensory panel-panellist monitoring and tracking. J. Chemometr. 19 (3 154 161.
18. MEHINAGIC, E., ROYER, G. SYMONEAUX, R. 2004. Prediction of the sensory quality of apples by physical measurements. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34 (3 257 269.
19. MEHINAGIC, E., ROYER, G., SYMONEAUX, R., JOURJON, F. PROST, C. 2006. Characterization of odor-active volatiles in apples: Influence of cultivars and maturity stage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54 (7 2678 2687.
20. MILLER, S., HAMPSON, C., MCNEW, R., BERKETT, L., BROWN, S., CLEMENTS, J., CRASSWELLER, R., GARCIA, E., GREENE, D. GREENE, G. 2005. Performance of apple cultivars in the 1995 NE-183 regional project planting: III. Fruit sensory characteristics. J. Am. Pomolog. Soc. 59 (1 28 43.
21. MURRAY, J.M., DELAHUNTY, C.M. BAXTER, I.A. 2001. Descriptive sensory analysis: Past, present and future. Food Res. Int. 34, 461 471.
22. O'MAHONY, M. 1995. Sensory measurement in food science: Fitting methods to goals. Food Technol. 49, 72 82.
23. STEBBINS, R.L., DUNCAN, A.A., COMPTON, O.C. Duncan, D. 1991. Taste ratings of new apple cultivars. Fruit Varieties J. 45, 37 44.
24. STOW, J. 1995. Quality measurements of apples. Postharvest News Inf. 6 (3 32 33.
25. VARELA, P., SALVADOR, A. FISZMAN, S. 2005. Shelf-life estimation of "Fuji" apples: Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 38 (1 18 24.