Assessing the performance of a sensory panel-panellist monitoring and tracking

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 154-161

  Kermit, Martin ^a   Lengard, Valérie ^a  

^a CAMO SOFTWARE AS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Agreement error; ANOVA; Crossover; Eggshell plot; Reproducibility; Sensitivity; Sensory panel performance

Indexed keywords

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSORY ANALYSIS;

AGREEMENT ERROR; CROSSOVER; EGGSHELL PLOT; PERFORMANCE; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SENSITIVITY; SENSORY PANEL PERFORMANCE; SENSORY PANELS; UNIVARIATE;

ERRORS;

EID: 28844500843     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.918     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Lea P, Næs T, Rødbotten M. Analysis of Variance for Sensory Data. Wiley: Chichester, 1997.
2. Brockhoff PB. Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling. Food Qual. Prefer. 2003; 14: 113-134.
3. Lundahl DS, McDaniel MR. The panelist effect - fixed or random? J. Sens. Stud. 1988; 3: 113-121.
4. Dijksterhuis G. Assessing panel consonance. Food Qual. Prefer. 1995; 6: 7-14.
5. Martens M. Sensory and chemical quality criteria for white cabbage studied by multivariate data analysis. Lebensm.-Wiss. Technol. 1985; 18: 100-104.
6. Per Lea, Marit Røndbotten and Tormod Næs, Measuring validityin sensory analysis, Food Quality and Preference, Volume 6, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 321-326, Second Sensometrics Meeting, doi:10.1016/0950-3293(95) 00036-4
7. Lundahl DS, McDaniel MR. Influence of panel inconsistency on the outcome of sensory evaluations from descriptive panels. J. Sens. Stud. 1991; 6: 145-157.
8. King MC, Hall J, Cliff MA. A comparison of methods for evaluating the performance of a trained sensory panel. J. Sens. Stud. 2001; 16: 567-582.
9. Harald Martens and Magni Martens, Modified jack knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modelling by partial least squares regression (PLSR) Food Quality and Preference, Volume 11, Issues 1-2, January 2000, Pages 5-16. doi:10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00039-7
10. McCulloch CE, Searle SR. Generalized, Linear and Mixed Models. Wiley: New York, NY, 2000.
11. Lundahl DS, McDaniel MR. Use of contrasts for the evaluation of panel inconsistency. J. Sens. Stud. 1990; 5: 265-277.
12. Næs T. Detecting individual differences among assessors and differences among replicates in sensory profiling. Food Qual. Prefer. 1998; 9: 107-110.
13. Hirst D, Næs T. A graphical technique for assessing differences among a set of rankings. J. Chemometrics 1994; 8: 81-93.
14. Lea P, Rødbotten M, Næs T. Measuring validity in sensory analysis. Food Qual. Prefer. 1995; 6: 321-326.
15. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988.
16. Camo. The Unscramble®. [Online]. Available: http://www.camo.com/rt/ Products/Unscrambler/unscrambler.html (accessed September 1, 2005).
17. Camo. Panelist Monitoring and Tracking [Online]. Available from January 2006: http://www.camo.com/rt/Products/Unscrambler/pmt.html.
18. Martens H, Martens M. Modified jack-knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modelling by partial least squares regression (PLSR). Food Qual. Prefer. 2000; 11: 5-16.