Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Cheraghi Sohi, Sudeh ^a   Bower, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEEDBACK; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 52149097318     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-179     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. New Contract for general practitioners. P Shekelle, BMJ 2003 326 457 458 12609914 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.457
2. A First Class service: Quality in the New NHS. NHS Executive, 1998
3. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. M Wensing J Jung J Mainz Olesen F R Grol, Social Science and Medicine 1998 47 1573 1588 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00222-6
4. The Physicians role. CA McBride DA Shugars MR DiMatteo HS Lepper O'Neil EH TM Damush, Archives of Family Medicine 2007 3 948 953 10.1001/archfami.3.11. 948
5. What do patients want from their general practitioners and their patients want from general practice and are they receiving it: a framework. S Buetow, Social Science and Medicine 1995 40 213 221 10.1016/0277-9536(94)E0074-3
6. Trends in patients' experience of the NHS. A Coulter, Oxford, Picker Institute Europe 2006
7. Perceptions of good medical practice in the NHS: a survey of senior health professionals. A Hutchison M Williams K Meadows, Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007 8 213 218
8. Patient complaints about physician behaviours: a qualitative study. MM Wofford JL Wofford J Bothra SB Kendrick A Smith PR Lichstein, Academic Medicine 2004 79 134 138 10.1097/00001888-200402000-00008 14744713
9. Measuring Patients' assessments of primary care quality: the use of self-report questionnaires. P Bower, Expert Review Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Research 2003 3 551 560 10.1586/14737167.3.5.551
10. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. M Stewart, CMAJ 2007 152 9 1423 1433 7728691
11. The increasing importance of patient surveys. PD Cleary, BMJ 1999 319 720 721 10487981
12. Changing Professional Behaviour. An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. JM Grimshaw L Shirran R Thomas G Mowatt C Fraser L Bero R Grilli, Medical Care 2001 39 2 45 10.1097/00005650-200108002-00002
13. Audit and Feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. G Jamtvedt JM Young DT Kristoffersen MA O'Brien AD Oxman, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 2 CD000259 16625533
14. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of fifty randomised controlled trials. DA Davis MA Thomson AD Oxman RB Haynes, JAMA 1992 268 1111 1117 10.1001/jama.268.9.1111 1501333
15. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions. AD Oxman MA Thomson DA Davis RB Haynes, Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995 153 1423 1427 7585368
16. Impact of Formal Continuing Medical Education. Do conferences, workshops, rounds and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behaviour or health care outcomes? D Davis MAT O'Brien N Freemantle FM Wolf P Mazmanian A Taylor-Vaisey, JAMA 1999 282 867 874 10.1001/jama.282.9.867 10478694
17. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance:BEME Guide No.7. J Veloski JR Boex MJ Grasberger A Evans DB Wolfson, Medical Teacher 2006 28 117 128 10.1080/01421590600622665 16707292
18. Effect of physician profiling on utilisation: meta analysis of randomized clinical trials. A Balas S Boren G Brown B Ewigman J Mitchell G Perkoff, Journal of General Internal Medicine 1996 11 584 590 10.1007/BF02599025 8945689
19. Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. K Dickersin E Manheimer S Wieland KA Robinson C Lefebvre S McDonald, Eval Health Prof 2002 25 1 38 64 11868444
20. A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controled trails for systematic reviews of heallth care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies. P Royle N Waugh, BMC Medical Research Methodology 2005 5 23 30 16042789 10.1186/1471-2288-5-23
21. Asessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study. LP Moja E Telaro R D'Amico I Moschetti L Coe A Liberati, BMJ 2005 330 1053 1058 15817526 10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F
22. Cluster randomised trials: time for improvement. M Campbell J Grimshaw, BMJ 1998 318 1171
23. Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement? M Wensing E Vingerhoets R Grol, Patient Education and Counselling 2003 51 149 153 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00199-4
24. Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial. E Vingerhoets M Wensing R Grol, Quality in Health Care 2001 10 224 228 11743151 10.1136/qhc.0100224.
25. An intervention to increase patients' trust in their physicians. DH Thom DA Bloch ES Segal, Academic Medicine 1999 74 195 198 10.1097/00001888-199902000- 00019 10065061
26. Training physicians to increase patient trust. DH Thom, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2000 6 245 253 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00249.x 11083035
27. Impact of patient feedback on the interpersonal skills of general practice registrars: results of a longitudinal study. M Greco A Brownlea J McGovern, Medical Education 2003 35 748 756 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00976.x
28. A communication skills programme for increasing patients' satisfaction with general practice consultations. BJ Evans FD Kiellerup RO Stanley GD Burrows B Sweet, British Journal of medical Psychology 1987 60 373 378 3426975
29. Effect of patient completed agenda forms and doctors' education about the agenda on the outcome of consultations: a randomised controlled trial. JF Middleton RK McKinley CL Gillies, BMJ 2006 332 1238 1242 16707508 10.1136/bmj.38841.444861.7C
30. Increasing patient knowledge, satisfaction, and involvement: Randomised trial of a communication intervention. C Lewis RH Pantell L Sharp, Pediatrics 1991 88 351 358 1861939
31. Teaching the medical interview. SM Putnam WB Stiles MC Jacob SA James, Journal of General Internal Medicine 1988 3 38 47 10.1007/BF02595755 3339486
32. .Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes. SK Joos DH Hickman GH Gordon LH Baker, Journal of General Internal Medicine 1996 11 147 155 10.1007/BF02600266 8667091
33. Effect of clinician communication skills training on patient satisfaction. J Betz-Brown M Boles JP Mullooly W Levinson, Annals of Internal Medicine 1999 131 822 829 10610626
34. Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods. RG Evans A Edwards S Evans B Elwyn G Elwyn, Family Practice 2007 24 117 127 10.1093/fampra/cml072 17264071
35. Modification of Residents' behavior by preceptor feedback of patient satisfaction. DW Cope LS Linn B Leake PA Barrett, Journal of General Internal Medicine 1986 1 394 398 10.1007/BF02596425 3794839
36. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure in general practice. S Mercer M Maxwell D Heaney G Watt, Family Practice 2004 21 699 705 10.1093/fampra/cmh621 15528286
37. Patients' own assessment of quality of primary car compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care:cross-sectional study. M Rao A Clarke C Sanderson R Hammersley, BMJ 2006 333 19 22 16793783 10.1136/bmj.38874.499167.7C
38. What makes a good general practitioner: do patients and doctors have different views? H Jung M Wesing R Grol, British Journal of General Practice 1997 47 805 809 9463981
39. Real-patient evaluation of communication skills teaching for GP registrars. M Greco W Francis J Buckley A Brownlea J McGovern, Family Practice 1998 15 51 57 10.1093/fampra/15.1.51 9527298
40. Theoretical and Methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. D Locker D Dunt, Social Science and Medicine 1978 12 283 292
41. The need to take another look at the patient in general practice satisfaction surveys. J Hopton J Howie M Porter, Family Practice 2003 10 82 87 10.1093/fampra/10.1.82
42. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review and analysis. J Rees Lewis, Social Science and Medicine 1994 39 655 670 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90022-1
43. What methods do stakeholders prefer for feeding back performance data: a qualitative study in palliative care. M Gysels R Hughes F Aspinal JM ddington-Hall IJ Higginson, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16 375 381 10.1093/intqhc/mzh067 15375098
44. Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings. U Freudenstein A Howe, British Journal of General Practice 1999 49 995 1001 10824348
45. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. SA Lewin ZC Skea V Entwistle M Zwarenstein J Dick, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001 4 CD003267 11687181
46. A strategy for improving patient satisfaction by the intensive training of residents in psychosocial medicine: a controlled, randomized study. RC Smith JS Lyles JA Mettler AA Marshall LF Van Egeren BE Stoffelmayr GG Osborn V Shebroe, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 1995 70 729 732 7646751
47. Increased focus on the teaching of interactional skills to medical practitioners. JJ Perkins RW Sanson-Fisher, Advances in Health Sciences Education 1996 1 17 28 10.1007/BF00596227
48. Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systemativ review of training methods. M Gysels A Richardson IJ Higginson, Support Care Cancer 2005 13 356 366 10.1007/s00520-004-0732-0 15586302
49. Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of effectiveness. M Gysels A Richardson IJ Higginson, Support Care Cancer 2004 12 692 700 10.1007/s00520-004-0666-6 15258839
50. Why can't GPs follow guidelines on depression? T Kendrick, BMJ 2000 320 200 201 10642207 10.1136/bmj.320.7229.200
51. Publication bias in clinical research. PJ Easterbrook AJ Berlin R Gopalan DR Matthews, Lancet 1991 337 867 872 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y 1672966
52. Publication and related biases. F Song AJ Eastwood S Gilbody L Duley AJ Sutton, Health technology assessment Health Technology Assessment 2000 4
53. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a tower of Babel bias? G Gregoire F Derderian J LeLorier, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995 48 159 163 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00098-B 7853041
54. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. M Egger T Zellweger-Zähner M Schneider C Junker C Lengeler, Lancet 1997 350 326 329 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02419-7 9251637
55. Cluster randomised trials: time for improvement. M Campbell J Grimshaw, BMJ 1998 317 1171 9794847
56. 2006/7 UK General Practice Workload Survey. R Stones N Janvier K Robbins, The Information Centre 2007 http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/ gp_workload_survey_2006_07.pdf (accessed 6th May 2008)
57. Who needs doctors in general practice? B Sibbald, Quality in Primary Care 2008 16 73 74 18700082
58. Motivating physician behaviour change: social influence versus financial contingencies. WA Goodpastor ID Motoya, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 1996 9 4 9 10.1108/09526869610128214 10162128