Linking dendritic network structures to population demogenetics: The downside of connectivity

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1479-1490

  Labonne, Jacques ^a   Ravigné, Virginie ^b   Parisi, Bruno ^a   Gaucherel, Cédric ^c  

^a Ecologie Comportementale et Biologie des Populations de Poissons   (France)

^b CIRAD   (France)

^c UMR AMAP   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAVE; CONNECTIVITY; GENE FLOW; METAPOPULATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION MODELING; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

HORTONIA;

EID: 52049085262     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16976.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrahams, A. D. 1984. Channel networks: a geomorphological perspective Water Resour. Res. 20 : 161 168.
2. Bascompte, J. Sole, R. V. 1998. Modelling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Springer.
3. Campbell Grant, E. H. et al. 2007. Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks Ecol. Lett. 10 : 165 175.
4. Charles, S. et al. 2000. Annual spawning migrations in modelling brown trout population dynamics inside an arborescent river network Ecol. Modell. 133 : 15 31.
5. Chaumot, A. et al. 2006. First step of a modeling approach to evaluate spatial heterogeneity in a fish (Cottus gobio) population dynamics Ecol. Modell. 197 : 263 273.
6. Clobert, J. et al. 2001. Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press.
7. DeAngelis, D. L. Mooij, W. M. 2005. Individual-based modelling of ecological and evolutionary processes Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36 : 147 168.
8. Dodds, P. S. Rothman, D. H. 2001. Unified view of scaling laws for river networks Phys. Rev. E 59 : 4865 4877.
9. Economo, E. P. Keitt, T. H. 2007. Species diversity in neutral metacommunities: a network approach Ecol. Lett. 11 : 52 62.
10. Facon, B. David, P. 2006. Metapopulation dynamics and biological invasions: a spatially explicit model applied to a freshwater snail Am. Nat. 168 : 769 783.
11. Fagan, W. F. 2002. Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations Ecology 83 : 3243 3249.
12. Fortuna, M. A. et al. 2006. Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273 : 1429 1434.
13. Gaucherel, C. 2003. Pertinence de la notion d'indicateur pour la caractérisation du bassin versant Espace Géogr. 3 : 265 281.
14. Goreaud, F. et al. 2006. Long-term influence of the spatial structure of an initial state on the dynamics of a forest growth model: a simulation study using the Capsis platform Simulation 82 : 475 495.
15. Grimm, V. et al. 1999. Individual-based modelling and ecological theory: synthesis of a workshop Ecol. Modell. 115 : 275 282.
16. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Ser. Ecol. Evol.
17. Hanski, I. A. Gilpin, M. E. 1997. Metapopulation biology, ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press.
18. Harrison, S. Hastings, A. 1996. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 : 180 183.
19. Hedrick. 2000. Genetics of populations, 2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
20. Horton, R. E. 1945. Erosional of stream and their drainage basin: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 56 : 255 370.
21. Jager, H. I. 2006. Chutes and ladders and other games we play with rivers: I. Upstream passage. II. Simulated effects of translocation on white sturgeon Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63 : 165 184.
22. Labonne, J. Gaudin, P. 2006. Modelling population viability in fragmented environments: contribution to the conservation of an endangered percid (Zingel asper) Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63 : 650 659.
23. Levins, R. 1970. Extinction Gerstenhaber, R. Some mathematical questions in biology. - Am. Math. Soc 77 107.
24. Mandelbrot, B. B. 1983. The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freeman and Company.
25. Manel, S. et al. 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 189 197.
26. Matsubara, H. et al. 2001. A river metapopulation structure of a japanese freshwater goby, Odontobutis obscura, deduced from allozyme genetic indices Environ. Biol. Fishes 61 : 285 294.
27. May, R. M. 2006. Network structure and the biology of populations Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 : 394 399.
28. McArthur, R. H. Wilson, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press.
29. McCauley, D. E. 1991. Genetic consequences of local population extinction and recolonization Trends Ecol. Evol. 6 : 5 8.
30. Meffe, G. K. Caroll, C. R. 1994. Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer.
31. Meldgaard, T. et al. 2003. Fragmentation by weirs in a riverine system: a study of genetic variation in time and space among population of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) in a Danish river system Conserv. Genet. 4 : 735 747.
32. Moilanen, A. Hanski, I. 2001. On the use of connectivity measures in patial ecology Oikos 95 : 147 151.
33. Moilanen, A. Nieminen, M. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology Ecology 83 : 1131 1145.
34. Montoya, J. M. et al. 2006. Ecological networks and their fragility Nature 442 : 259 264.
35. Muneepeerakul, R. et al. 2007. A neutral metapopulation model of biodiversity in river networks J. Theor. Biol. 245 : 351 363.
36. Neville, H. M. et al. 2004. Landscape attributes and life history variability shape genetic structure of trout populations in a stream network Landscape Ecol. 21 : 901 916.
37. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks SIAM Rev. 45 : 167 256.
38. Pachepsky, E. et al. 2005. Persistence, spread and the drift paradox Theor. Popul. Biol. 67 : 61 73.
39. Retho, B. et al. 2007. Modelling spatially explicit population dynamics of Pterostichus melanarius I11. (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in response to changes in the composition and configuration of agricultural landscapes Landscape Urban. Plan. 84 : 191 199.
40. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Rinaldo, A. 2001. Fractal river basins, chance and self-organization. Cambridge Univ. Press.
41. Rousset, F. 1997. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance Genetics 145 : 1219 1228.
42. Rousset, F. 2000. Genetic differentiation between individuals J. Evol. Biol. 13 : 58 62.
43. Sawyer, S. 1978. Isotropic random walks in a tree Z. Wahrscheinlichtkeitstheorie verwandte Gebiete 42 : 279 292.
44. Schick, R. S. Lindley, S. T. 2007. Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network J. Appl. Ecol. 44 : 1116 1126.
45. Speirs, D. C. Gurney, W. S. C. 2001. Population persistence in rivers and estuaries Ecology 82 : 1219 1237.
46. Strahler, A. N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 38 : 913 920.
47. Tarboton, D. G. 1996. Fractal river networks, Horton's laws and Tokunaga cyclicity J. Hydrol. 187 : 105 117.
48. Taylor, E. B. et al. 2003. Population subdivision in westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) at the northern periphery of its range: evolutionary inferences and conservation implications Mol. Ecol. 12 : 2069 2622.
49. Tilman, D. Kareiva, P. 1997. Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton Univ. Press.
50. Tokunaga, E. 1978. Consideration on the composition of drainage networks and their evolution Tokyo Metrop. Univ. Geogr. Rep. 13 : 1 27.
51. Turner, M. G. Gardner, R. H. 1991. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer.
52. Vannote, R. L. et al. 1980. The river continuum concept Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37 : 130 137.
53. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations Genetics 16 : 97 159.
54. Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations Ann. Eugen. 15 : 323 354.