Considering dependence among genes and markers for false discovery control in eQTL mapping

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 18, 2008, Pages 2015-2022

  Chen, Liang ^a   Tong, Tiejun ^b   Zhao, Hongyu ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME ANALYSIS; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VARIANCE;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC MARKERS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 51749122453     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn373     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful appraoch to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 57, 289-300.
2. Brem,R. et al. (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science, 296, 752-755.
3. Broman,K. et al. (2003) R/qtl: Qtl mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics, 19, 889-890.
4. Bystrykh,L. et al. (2005) Uncovering regulatory pathways that affect hematopoietic stem cell function using "genetical genomics". Nat. Genet., 37, 225-232.
5. Chen,L. and Storey,J. (2006) Relaxed significance criteria for linkage analysis. Genetics, 173, 2371-2381.
6. Chesler,E. et al. (2005) Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function. Nat. Genet., 37, 233-242.
7. Cheverud,J. (2001) A simple correction for multiple comparisons in interval mapping genome scans. Heredity, 87, 52-58.
8. Churchill,G. and Doerge,R. (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics, 138, 963-971.
9. Cohen,B. et al. (2000) A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression. Nat. Genet., 26, 183-186.
10. Consortium,T.I.H. (2003) The international hapmap project. Nature, 426, 789-796.
11. Doerge,R. and Churchill,G. (1996) Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics, 142, 285-294.
12. Efron,B. (2007) Correlation and large-scale simultaneous significance testing. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 102, 93-103.
13. Hubner,N. et al. (2005) Integrated transcriptional profiling and linkage analysis for identification of genes underlying disease. Nat. Genet., 37, 243-253.
14. Lehmann,E. and Romano,J. (2005) Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Stat., 33, 1138-1154.
15. Morley,M. et al. (2004) Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression. Nature, 430, 743-747.
16. Owen,A. (2005) Variance of the number of false discoveries. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 67, 411-426.
17. Roeder,K. et al. (2006) Using linkage genome scans to improve power of association in genome scans. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 78 243-252.
18. Schadt,E. et al. (2003) Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize and mouse and man. Nature, 422, 297-302.
19. Spielman,R. et al. (2007) Common genetic variants account for differences in gene expression among ethnic groups. Nat. Genet., 39, 226-231.
20. Storey,J. and Tibshirani,R. (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9440-9445.
21. Stranger,B. et al. (2005) Genome-wide associations of gene expression variation in humans. PLoS Genet., 1, e78.
22. Stranger,B. et al. (2007) Population genomics of human gene expression. Nat. Genet., 39, 1217-1224.
23. Vysochanskiï,D. and Petunin,Y. (1980) Justification of the 3 σ rule for unimodal distributions. Theor. Probab. Math. Stat., 21, 22-36.