"It basically is a fairly loose arrangement ... and that works out fine, really." Analysing the Dynamics of an Interorganisational Partnership

Sport Management Review

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 203-228

  Shaw, Sally ^a   Allen, Justine B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

New Zealand; nonprofit; partnership dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 51749100242     PISSN: 14413523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1441-3523(06)70026-2     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. 3W. (2003). 3W Report. NZ: 3W.
2. 3W. (2002-03). 3W Report. NZ: 3W.
3. Ahuja G., and The duality of collaboration. Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000) 317-343
4. Aitchison C. Poststructural feminist theories of representing others: A response to the 'crisis' in leisure studies' discourse. Leisure Studies 19 (2000) 127-144
5. Alter C. An exploratory study of conflict and coordination in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Management Journal 33 (1990) 478-502
6. Amis J., Slack T., and Hinings B. Strategic change and the role of interests, power, and organizational capacity. Journal of Sport Management 18 (2004) 158-199
7. Babiak, K.M. (2003). Examining partnerships in an amateur sport: The case of a Canadian national sport centre. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
8. Blau J.R., and Rabrenovic G. Interorganizational relations of nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Sociological Forum 6 (1991) 327-347
9. Das T.K., and Teng B.S. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23 (1998) 491-512
10. Diamond J. Strategies to resolve conflict in partnerships: Reflections on UK urban generation. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 15 (2002) 296-306
11. Ely R.J., and Meyerson D.E. Advancing gender equity in organizations: The challenge and importance of maintaining a gender narrative. Organization 7 (2000) 589-608
12. Falcous M., and Shaw S. Academics question value of $3.8m cost per gold medal. Sunday Star Times (2005, 17 April) B2
13. Fine M., Weis L., Weseen S., and Wong L. For whom? Qualitative research representations and social responsibilities. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks 107-133
14. Fink J.S., Pastore D.L., and Riemer H.A. Do differences make a difference? Managing diversity in Division 1A intercollegiate athletics. Journal of Sport Management 15 (2001) 10-50
15. Fink J.S., Pastore D.L., and Riemer H.A. Managing employee diversity: Perceived practices and organisational outcomes in NCAA Division III athletic departments. Sport Management Review 6 (2003) 147-169
16. Fiol C.M., O'Connor E.J., and Aguinis H. All for one and one for all? The development of power across organizational levels. Academy of Management Review 26 (2001) 224-242
17. Frisby W., Thibault L., and Kikulis L. The organizational dynamics of under-managed partnerships in leisure service departments. Leisure Studies 23 2 (2004) 109-126
18. Galaskiewicz J., and Wasserman S. Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly 34 (1989) 454-480
19. Glover T.D., and Burton T.L. Alternative forms of public leisure services. In: Collins M.F., and Cooper I.S. (Eds). Leisure management: Issues and applications (1998), CAB International, Wallingford 139-157
20. Glover T.D. Municipal park and recreation agencies unite{exclamation point} A single case analysis of an inter-municipal partnership. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 17 1 (1999) 73-90
21. Glover T.D. Propositions addressing the privatization of public leisure services: Implications for efficiency, effectiveness, and equity. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 17 2 (1999) 1-27
22. Hardy C., Phillips N., and Lawrence T.B. Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies 40 (2003) 321-347
23. Hutt M.D., Stafford E.R., Walker B.A., and Reingen P.H. Defining the social network of a strategic alliance. Sloan Management Review 41 2 (2000) 51-62
24. Huxham C., and Vangen S. Working together. Key themes in the management of relationships between public and non-profit organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management 9 7 (1996) 5-17
25. Huxham C., and Vangen S. Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration. Human Relations 53 (2000) 771-806
26. Inkpen A.C., and Currall S.C. The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science 15 (2004) 586-599
27. Inglis, S., Doherty, A.J., Fink, J.S., & Pastore, D.L. (2005, June). Understanding a culture of diversity through frameworks of power and change. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the North American Society for Sport Management, Regina, SK.
28. nd ed. (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks 379-399
29. Kanter R.M. When giants learn cooperative strategies. Planning Review 18 1 (1990) 15-22
30. Kikulis L. Continuity and change in governance and decision making in national sport organizations: Institutional explanations. Journal of Sport Management 14 (2000) 293-320
31. McQueen M. Us and them. Decoding the language of nonprofit-business partnerships. Nonprofit World 22 1 (2004) 21-22
32. Miller P., and Rose N. Governing economic life. In: Gane M., and Johnson T. (Eds). Foucault's New Domains (1993), Routledge, London 75-105
33. Mohr J., and Spekman R. Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal 15 (1994) 135-152
34. Nooteboom B., Berger H., and Booderhaven N.G. Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. The Academy of Management Journal 40 (1997) 308-338
35. Pope C., Shaw S., and Allen J.B. An evaluative study of 3W (2004), University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ
36. Ring P.S., and Van de Ven A.H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organisations. Strategic Management Journal 13 (1992) 483-498
37. Robinson S.E. Improving organisational communication: Developing a management strategy. International Journal of Public Sector Management 3 1 (1990) 25-36
38. Sam M.P., and Jackson S.J. Sport policy development in New Zealand. Paradoxes of an integrative paradigm. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 39 (2004) 205-222
39. Shaw S., and Frisby W. Can gender equity be more equitable? Promoting an alternative frame for sport management research, education, and practice. Journal of Sport Management 20 (2006) 483-509
40. Shaw S., and Penney D. Gender equity policies in national governing bodies: An oxymoron or a vehicle for change?. European Sport Management Quarterly 3 (2003) 78-102
41. Simmonds B. Trends in public/private sector partnerships. Journal of Leisure Property 1 1 (2000) 66-74
42. nd ed. (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 435-455
43. Stenson M. The Treaty. Every New Zealander's guide to the Treaty of Waitangi (2004), Random House, Auckland
44. Taylor T., and Toohey K. Sport, gender, and cultural diversity: Exploring the nexus. Journal of Sport Management 13 (1999) 1-18
45. Thibault L., Frisby W., and Kikulis L. Interorganizational linkages in the delivery of local leisure services in Canada: Responding to economic, political and social pressures. Managing Leisure 4 (1999) 125-141
46. Thibault L., and Harvey J. Fostering interorganizational linkages in the Canadian sport delivery system. Journal of Sport Management 11 (1997) 45-69
47. Wilson L.A., and Boyle E. The role of partnerships in the delivery of local government museum services. A case study from Northern Ireland. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 17 (2004) 513-533