Developing a decision support system for tobacco use counselling using primary care physicians

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 101-109

  Marcy, Theodore W ^a   Kaplan, Bonnie ^b,c,d   Connolly, Scott W ^a   Michel, George ^b   Shiffman, Richard N ^b   Flynn, Brian S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^d Kaplan Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Medical informatics; Qualitative research; Smoking cessation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSULTATION; COUNSELING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ETHNOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SMOKING CESSATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 51749091077     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v16i2.681     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Grag A, Adhikari N, McDonald H et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of theAmeri can Medical Association 2005; 293:1223-38.
2. Kawamoto K, Houlihan C, Balas E and Lobach D. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. British Medical Journal 2005; 330:765-72.
3. Blumenthal D and Glaser J. Information technology comes to medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;356:2527-34.
4. Shiffman R, Brandt C, Liaw Y and Corb G. A design model for computer-based guideline implementation based on information management services. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1999;6:99-103.
5. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America of the Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
6. Frist W. Health care in the 21st century. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352:267-72.
7. James B. Making it easy to do it right. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;345:991-3.
8. Hunt D, Haynes R, Hanna S and Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association 1998;280:1339-46.
9. Shiffman R, Liaw Y, Brandt C and Corb G. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1999;6: 104-14.
10. Hesse B and Shneiderman B. eHealth research from the user's perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2007;32:S97-S103.
11. Wears R and Berg M. Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005;293:1261-3.
12. Lee J, Cain C, Young S, Chockley N and Burstin H. The adoption gap: health information technology in small physician practices. Health Affairs 2005;24:1364-6.
13. Wachter R. Expected and unanticipated consequences of the quality and information technology revolutions. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006;295: 2780-3.
14. Elson R. Clinical practice guidelines: the role of technology in perspective. Disease Management Health Outcomes 1997;1:63-74.
15. Kaplan B, Brennan P, Dowling A, Friedman C and Peel V. Towards an informatics research agenda: key people and organizational issues. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2001; 8:235-41.
16. Friedman C. Information technology leadership in academic medical centers: a tale of four cultures. Academic Medicine 1999;74:795-9.
17. Littlejohns P, Wyatt J and Garvican L. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. British Medical Journal 2003;326:860-3.
18. Fiore M, Jaen C, Baker T et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 update. Clinical Practice Guideline Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, May 2008.
19. Wyatt J and Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: what to test and how? Medical Informatics 1990; 15:205-17.
20. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications: clinical decision support systems literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001;64:15-37.
21. Kaplan B and Shaw N. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues. Methods of Information in Medicine 2004;43:215-31.
22. Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997;4:94-101.
23. Marcy T, Skelly J, Shiffman R and Flynn B. Attitudes and opinions of physicians and clinic managers towards clinical decision support systems to improve adherence to the tobacco use treatment guidelines. Preventive Medicine 2005;41:479-87.
24. Venkatesh V and Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000;46:186-204.
25. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations (5e). New York, NY: Free Press, 2003.
26. Kaplan B, Drickamer M and Marottoli R. Deriving design recommendations through discount usability engineering: ethnographic observation and thinking-aloud protocol in usability testing for computer-based teaching cases. In: Musen M (ed) Proceedings of the 2003 AMIA Annual Symposium. Bethesda, MD: AMIA, 2003, pp. 346-50.
27. Kaplan B and Maxwell J. Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In: Anderson J and Aydin C (eds) Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems. New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 30-55.
28. Smith III A. Design and conduct of subjectivist studies. In: Friedman C and Wyatt J (eds) Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. New York: Springer, 1997, pp. 223-53.
29. Hing E and Burt C. Office-based Medical Practices: methods and estimates from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2007.
30. Michel G, Marcy T and Shiffman R. A wireless, handheld decision support system to promote smoking cessation in primary care. In: Friedman C (ed) Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, 2005. Bethesda, MD: AMIA, 2005, pp. 530-4.
31. Jaen C, Stange K, Tumiel L and Nutting P. Missed opportunities for prevention: smoking cessation counseling and the competing demands of practice. Journal of Family Practice 1997;45:348-54.
32. Yarnall K, Pollak K, Ostbye T, Krause K and Michener J. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? American Journal of Public Health 2003;93:635-41.