Doctoral students' use of examples in evaluating and proving conjectures

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 111-129

  Alcock, Lara ^a   Inglis, Matthew ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Examples; Generic examples; Number theory; Proof; Reasoning; Strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 51549100977     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-008-9149-x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alcock, L. (2008). Mathematicians' perspectives on the teaching and learning of proof. In F. Hitt, D. A. Holton, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education VII (pp. 73-100). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
2. Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2004). Convergence of sequences and series: Interactions between visual reasoning and the learner's beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 1-32. doi: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047051.07646.92.
3. Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2005). Convergence of sequences and series 2: Interactions between nonvisual reasoning and the learner's beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 77-100. doi: 10.1007/s10649-005-2813-5.
4. Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2008). Referential and syntactic approaches to proving: Case studies from a transition-to-proof course. In F. Hitt, D. A. Holton, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education VII (pp. 101-123). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
5. Balacheff, N. (1987). Processus de preuves et situations de validation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 147-176. doi: 10.1007/BF00314724.
6. Bills, L., & Rowland, T. (1999). Examples, generalization and proof. In L. Brown (Ed.), Making meaning in mathematics: A collection of extended and refereed papers from the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, Visions of Mathematics 2, Advances in Mathematics Education 1 (pp. 103-116). York: QED.
7. Bromley, D. B. (1986). The case-study method in psychology and related disciplines. Chichester: Wiley.
8. Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers: Learning about learning mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106, 1047-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007. 04.010.
10. Dahlberg, R. P., & Housman, D. L. (1997). Facilitating learning events through example generation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 283-299. doi: 10.1023/A:1002999415887.
11. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-126). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Ginsburg, H. (1981). The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 4-11.
13. Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 137-165. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80056-1.
14. Goldin, G. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Greiffenhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2005). Gestures in the blackboard work of mathematics instruction. Proceedings of 2nd Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies, Lyon, France, June 15-18, 2005.
16. Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field (1954 ed.). New York: Dover.
17. Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell, & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 185-212). Westport, CT: Ablex.
18. Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 3-21. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8.
19. Markowitz, L. M., and Tweney, R. D. (1981, May). An investigation of the behaviour of mathematicians engaged in testing a conjecture. Presented at Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, MI.
20. Mason, J., & Pimm, D. (1984). Generic examples: Seeing the general in the particular. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 277-289. doi: 10.1007/BF00312078.
21. Mason, J., & Watson, A. (2001). Stimulating students to construct boundary examples. Questiones Mathematicae, Suppl. 1, Supplement, 123-132.
22. Michener, E. R. (1978). Understanding understanding mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2, 361-383.
23. Pinto, M., & Tall, D. (1999). Student constructions of formal theories: Giving and extracting meaning. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol 1, pp. 281-288), Israel, Haifa.
24. Pinto, M., & Tall, D. O. (2002). Building formal mathematics on visual imagery: A case study and a theory. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22, 2-10.
25. Poincaré, H. (1905). Science and hypothesis. London: Scott.
26. Rowland, T. (2001). Generic proofs in number theory. In S. Campbell, & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 157-183). Westport, CT: Ablex.
27. Selden, J., & Selden, A. (1995). Unpacking the logic of mathematical statements. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 123-151. doi: 10.1007/BF01274210.
28. Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2001). Reflections on mathematics education research questions in elementary number theory. In S. Campbell, & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 213-230). Westport, CT: Ablex.
29. Selden, J., & Selden, A. (2003). Validation of proofs considered as texts: can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 4-36.
30. Stylianou, D. A. (2002). Interaction of visualization and analysis - the negotiation of a visual representation in problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 303-317. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00131-1.
31. Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in teaching and learning mathematics. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65-81). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Watson, A., & Mason, J. H. (2002). Extending example spaces as a learning strategy in mathematics. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol 4, pp. 377-384), Norwich, UK.
33. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Weber, K. (2008). How mathematicians determine if an argument is a valid proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 431-459.
35. Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2008). Syntactic and semantic reasoning processes in advanced mathematics. In M. Blanton, D. Stylianou, and E. Knuth (Eds.) A proof story across the grades (in press).
36. Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2004). Semantic and syntactic proof productions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 209-234. doi: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040410.57253.a1.
37. Weber, K., Alcock, L., & Radu, I. (2005). Undergraduates' use of examples in a transition-to-proof course. In S. Wilson (Ed.) Proceedings of the 26th Conference for the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Roanoke, VA.
38. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
39. Zazkis, R. (2001). Language of number theory: Metaphor and rigor. In S. Campbell, & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 83-95). Westport, CT: Ablex.