Generic and systematic evaluation of haptic interfaces based on testbeds

IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 2113-2119

  Samur, Evren ^a   Wang, Fei ^a   Spaelter, Ulrich ^a   Bleuler, Hannes ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW INTERACTIONS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

TEST-BEDS;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 51449118588     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2007.4399522     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. R. B. Gillespie. Haptic interface to virtual environments. Tn Robotics and Automation Handbook. Tom Kurfess (ed.), CRC Press, 2004.
2. D. A. Bowman, J. L. Gabbard, and D. Hix. A survey of usability evaluation in virtual environments: classification and comparison of methods. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 11(4):404-424, 2002.
3. D. A. Bowman and L. F. Hodges. Formalizing the design, evaluation, and application of interaction techniques for immersive virtual environments. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 10(l):37-53, 1999.
4. Xitact SA. http://www.xitact.com/products/lap/.
5. E. Ruffaldi, D. Morris, T. Edmunds, F. Barbagli, and D. K. Pai. Standardized evaluation of haptic rendering systems. In Proc. of IEEE Haptic Symposium, pages 225-232, 2006.
6. P. Leskovsky, T. Cooke, M. Ernst, and M. Harders. Using multidimensional scaling to quantify the fidelity of haptic rendering of deformable objects. In Proc. of Eurohaptics, pages 289-295. 2006.
7. J. E. Colgate and J. M. Brown. Factors affecting the Z-width of a haptic display. In IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pages 3205-3210, 1994.
8. D. A. Lawrence, L. Y. Pao, A. M. Dougherty, M. A. Salada, and Y. Pavlou. Rate-hardness: A new performance metric for haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 16(4):357-371, 2000.
9. B. Hannaford and J. Ryu. Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 18(1):1-10, 2002.
10. R. Ellis, O. Ismaeil, and M. Lipsett. Design and evaluation of a high-performance haptic interface. Robotica, 1996.
11. M. C. Cavusoglu, D. Feygin, and F. Tendick. A critical study of the mechanical and electrical properties of the phantom haptic interface and improvements for high-performance control. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 11 (6):555-568, 2002.
12. V. Hayward and O. Astley. Performance measures for haptic interfaces. Robotics Research: The 7th International Symposium., pages 195-207, 1996.
13. B. Hannaford, L. Wood, D. McAffee, and H. Zak. Performance evaluation of a six axis generalized force reflecting teleoperator. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21:620-633, 1991.
14. B.J. Unger, A. Nicolaidis, P.J. Berkelman, A. Thompson, R.L. Klatzky, and R.L. Hollis. Comparison of 3-d haptic peg-in-hole tasks in real and virtual environments. In IEEE/RSJ, IROS: 1751-1756, 2001.
15. S.A. Wall and W.S. Harwin. Quantification of the effects of haptic feedback during a motor skills task in a simulated environment. In Proc. of the 2nd PHANToM Users Research Symposium, pages 61-69, 2000.
16. K. Chun, B. Verplank, F. Barbagli, and K. Salisbury. Evaluating haptics and 3d stereo displays using fitts' law. In Proc. of The 3rd IEEE Workshop on HAVE, pages 53-58, 2004.
17. I. Oakley, M. R. McGee, S. A. Brewster, and P. D. Gray. Putting the feel in 'look and feel'. CHI: 415-422, 2000.
18. C.A. Avizzano, J. Solis, A. Frisoli, and M. Bergamasco. Motor learning skill experiments using haptic interface capabilities. In IEEE, RO-MAN: 198-203, 2002.
19. C. Basdogan, C. Ho, M. A. Srinivasan, and M. Slater. An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(4):443-460, 2000.
20. H. Tan. Identification of sphere size using the phantom: Towards a set of building blocks for rendering haptic environment. In ASME Annual Meeting: 197-203, 1997.
21. J. Weisenberger, M. Kreier, and M. Rinker. Judging the orientation of sinusoidal and square-wave virtual gratings presented via 2-dof and 3-dof haptic interfaces, 2000.
22. M. O'Malley and M. Goldfarb. The effect of force saturation on the haptic perception of detail. IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, 7:280-288, 2002.
23. P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Exp. Psychology, 47:381-391, 1954.
24. S.A. Wall and W. Harwin. A high bandwidth interface for haptic human computer interaction. Mechatronics, 11:371-387, 2001.
25. M. Harders, A. Barlit, K. Akahane, M. Sato, and G. Szkely. Comparing 6dof haptic interfaces for application in 3d assembly tasks. In Proc. of EuroHaptics'06, 2006.
26. A. Guerraz, C. Loscos, and H. Ritter Widenfeld. How to use physical parameters coming from the haptic device itself to enhance the evaluation of haptic benefits in user interface? In Proc. of Eurohaptics, 2003.
27. A.M. Kappers, J.J. Koenderink, and I. Lichtenegger. Haptic identification of curved surfaces. Perception and Psychophysics, 56 (1):53-61, 1994.
28. A. E. Kirkpatrick and S. A. Douglas. Application-based evaluation of haptic interfaces. In Proc. of the 10th Haptic Symposium, page 32, 2002.
29. A. M. Murray, R. L. Klatzky, and P. K. Khosla. Psychophysical characterization and testbed validation of a wearable vibrotactile glove for telemanipulation. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 12(2):156-182, 2003.
30. L. Jandura and M. A. Srinivasan. Experiments on human performance in torque discrimination and control. Dynamic Systems and Control, ASME, 55-1:369-375, 1994.
31. R.L. Klatzky, J. M. Loomis, S. J. Lederman, H. Wake, and N. Fujita. Haptic identification of objects and their depictions. Perception and Psychophysics, 54 (2):170-178, 1993.
32. G. Robles-De-La-Torre and V. Hayward. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature, 412:445-448, 2001.
33. Matthew Turk and George Robertson. Perceptual user interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 43(3):32-34, 2000.
34. T. Moix. Mechatronic elements and haptic rendering for computer-assisted minimally invasive surgery training. PhD Thesis EPFL, No. 3306, 2005.
35. I. S. MacKenzie. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7:91-139, 1992.
36. L. A. Jones and I. W. Hunter. A perceptual analysis of viscosity. Exp. Brain Res., 94:343-351, 1993.