Putting the feel in 'look and feel'

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 415-422

  Oakley, Ian ^a   McGee, Marilyn Rose ^a   Brewster, Stephen ^a   Gray, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Force feedback; Haptics; Multimodal interaction

Indexed keywords

FORCE FEEDBACK; HAPTIC DEVICES; HAPTICS; INTERACTION DESIGN; MULTI-MODAL INTERACTIONS; PHANTOM HAPTIC DEVICES; SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD; TASK COMPLETION TIME; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS;

EXPERIMENTS; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HAPTIC INTERFACES; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 0033720039     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/332040.332467     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Akamatsu, M. & Sate, S. (1994). A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (40), 443-453.
2. Akamatsu, M. & MacKenzie, S. (1996). Movement Characteristics using a Mouse with Tactile and Force Feedback. International Journal of Human Computer Studies (45), 483-493.
3. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. & Conversy, S. (1996). Auditory illusions for audio feedback. In ACM CH1'96 Conference Companion (Vancouver, Canada) ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 299-300.
4. Brewster, S.A. (1997). Using Non-Speech Sound to Overcome Information Overload. Displays, 17, 179- 189.
5. Brewster, S.A. (1998). The design of sonicallyenhanced widgets, hzteracting with Computers, 11(2), 211-235.
6. Campbell, C.S., Zhai, S., May, K.W. & Maglo, P. (1999). What you feel must be what you see: adding tactile feedback to the trackpoint. In IFIP Interact'99, (Edinburgh, UK), IOS Press, 383-390.
7. Engel, F.L., Goossens, P. & Haakma, R. (1994). Improved Efficiency through I- and E-Feedback: A Trackball with Contextual Force Feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(6), 949-974.
8. Hart, S.G. & Wickens, C. (1990). Workload assessment and prediction. MANPRINT, an approach to systems integration, 257-296, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
9. Lederman, S.J., Summers, C. & Klatzky, R.L. (1996). Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception, 25, 983-998.
10. Miller, T. & Zeleznik, R. (1998). An Insidious Haptic Invasion: Adding Force Feedback to the X Desktop. In ACM UIST'98, (San Francisco, CA) ACM Press, 59- 64.
11. Ramstein, C. (1995). A Multimodal User Interface System with Force Feedback and Physical Models. In IFIP Interact'95, (Lillehammer, Norway) Chapman & Hall, 157-162.
12. Ramstein, C. & Hayward, V. (1994). The Pantograph: A Large Workspace Haptic Device for Multi-Modal Human-Computer, Interaction. In Summary Proceedings of ACM CH1'94, (Boston, MA) ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 57-58.
13. Ramstein, C., Martial, O., Dufresne, A., Carignan, M., Chassé, P. & Mabilleau, P. (1996). Touching and hearing GUIs: Design issues for the PC-access system. In Proceedings of ACM Assets'96, (Vancouver, Canada), ACM Press, 2-10.
14. Rosenberg, L.B. (1997). FEELit mouse: Adding a realistic sense of FEEL to the computing experience. http://www.force-feedback.com/feelit.
15. Srinivasan, M.A. & Basdogan, C. (1997). Haptics in Virtual Environments: Taxonomy, Research Status, and Challenges. Computers and Graphics, 21 (4), 393- 404.
16. Zhai, S., Smith, B.A., & Selker, T. (1997). Improving Browsing Performance: A study of Four Input Devices for Scrolling and Pointing Tasks. In Proceedings of Interact 97, (Sydney, Aus) Chapman & Hall, 286-293.