Behavioral sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons (Columba livia): Blockade by the D 1 dopamine antagonist SCH-23390

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1080-1088

  Acerbo, Martin J ^a,b   Delius, Juan D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

8 CHLORO 2,3,4,5 TETRAHYDRO 3 METHYL 5 PHENYL 1H 3 BENZAZEPIN 7 OL HYDROGEN MALEATE; APOMORPHINE; DOPAMINE 1 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; INJECTION; NONHUMAN; PIGEON; SENSITIZATION; STRIATE CORTEX;

(R)-2,3,4,5-TETRAHYDRO-8-CHLORO-3-METHYL-5-PHENYL-1H-3-BENZAZEPIN-7-OL; ANIMALS; APOMORPHINE; COLUMBIDAE; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D1;

EID: 5144223439     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.5.1080     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Acerbo, M. J., Gargiulo, P. A., Krug, I., & Delius, J. D. (2002). Behavioural consequences of nucleus accumbens dopaminergic stimulation and glutamatergic blocking in pigeons. Behavioural Brain Research, 136, 171-177.
2. Acerbo, M. J., Godoy, A. M., & Delius, J. D. (2003). Haloperidol blocks the emergence, but not the expression of a conditioned sensitization to apomorphine. Behavioural Pharmacology, 14, 631-640.
3. Acerbo, M. J., Lee, J. M., & Delius, J. D. (2004). Sensitization to apomorphine, effects of dizocilpine NMDA blockade. Behavioural Brain Research, 151, 201-208.
4. Acerbo, M. J., Výboh, P., Kostal, L., Kubíková, L., & Delius, J. D. (2004). Repeated apomorphine administration modifies relative dopamine D1 and D2 receptor densities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Adams, J. U., Careri, J. M., Efferen, T. R., & Rotrosen, J. (2000). Conditioned locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in rats do not result from interference with habituation. Psychopharmacology, 151, 13-18.
6. Amalric, M., Ouagazzal, A., Baunez, C., & Nieoullon, A. (1994). Functional interactions between glutamate and dopamine in the rat striatum. Neurochemistry International, 25, 123-131.
7. Anagnostaras, S. G., & Robinson, T. E. (1996). Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: Modulation by associative learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 1397-1414.
8. Anagnostaras, S. G., Schallert, T., & Robinson, T. E. (2002). Memory processes governing amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization. Neuropsychopharmacology, 26, 703-715.
9. Baldessarini, R. J., Kula, N. S., Zong, R., & Neumeyer, J. L. (1994). Receptor affinities of apomorphine enantiomers in rat brain tissue. European Journal of Pharmacology, 254, 199-203.
10. Basten-Krefft, A. (1977). Apomorphin-induziertes Verhalten bei Tauben [Apomorphine-induced behavior in pigeons]. Doctoral thesis, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
11. Battisti, J. J., Uretsky, N. J., & Wallace, L. J. (1999). Sensitization of apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior in mice is context dependent. Psychopharmacology, 146, 42-48.
12. Battisti, J. J., Uretsky, N. J., & Wallace, L. J. (2000). Importance of environmental context in the development of amphetamine- or apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior after single and multiple doses. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 66, 671-677.
13. Bedingfield, J. B., Calder, L. D., & Karler, R. (1996). Comparative behavioral sensitization to stereotypy by direct and indirect dopamine agonists in CF-1 mice. Psychopharmacology, 124, 219-225.
14. Bell, K., Duffy, P., & Kalivas, P. W. (2000). Context-specific enhancement of glutamate transmission by cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology, 23, 335-344.
15. Bourne, J. A. (2001). SCH 23390: The first selective dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist. CNS Drug Reviews, 7, 399-414.
16. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
17. Brunelli, M., Magni, F., Moruzzi, G., & Musumeci, D. (1975). Apomorphine pecking in the pigeon. Archives Italienne de Biologie, 113, 303-325.
18. Caine, S. B., Heinrichs, S. C., Coffin, V. L., & Koob, G. F. (1995). Effects of the dopamine D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 microinjected into the accumbens, amygdala or striatum on cocaine self-administration in the rat. Brain Research, 692, 47-56.
19. Cheng, H. C., & Long, J. P. (1974). Dopaminergic nature of apomorphine-induced pecking in pigeons. European Journal of Pharmacology, 26, 313-320.
20. Crombag, H. S., Badiani, A., Chan, J., Dell'Orco, J., Dineen, S. P., & Robinson, T. E. (2001). The ability of environmental context to facilitate psychomotor sensitization to amphetamine can be dissociated from its effect on acute drug responsiveness and on conditioned responding. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24, 680-690.
21. Crombag, H. S., Badiani, A., Maren, S., & Robinson, T. E. (2000). The role of contextual versus discrete drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behavioural Brain Research, 116, 1-22.
22. Delius, J. D. (1985). The pecking of the pigeon: Free for all. In C. F. Lowe, M. Richelle, D. E. Blackman, & C. M. Bradshaw (Eds.), Behavior analysis and contemporary psychology (pp. 53-81). New York: Erlbaum.
23. Delius, J. D., Acerbo, M. J., Keller, S., & Godoy, A. M. (2001). Drogen-induziertes Lernen: Sensitivierung bei Apomorphin [Drug-induced learning: Sensitization to apomorphine]. Neuroforum, 4, 261-266.
24. Delius, J. D., Krug, I., Leydel, R., Keller, S., & Acerbo, M. J. (2004). Diverse effects of apomorphine on the behavior of pigeons. Manuscript in preparation.
25. Deviche, P. (1984). Administration of small doses of apomorphine attenuates feeding in non-deprived pigeons. Physiology & Behavior, 33, 581-585.
26. Djamoz, M. B., & Wagmer, H. J. (1992). Localization and function of dopamine in the adult vertebrate retina. Neurochemistry International, 20, 139-191.
27. Dubbledam, J. L. (1998). Birds. In R. Nieuwenhuys, H. J. Ten Donkelaar, & C. Nicholson (Eds.), The central nervous system of vertebrates (pp. 1526-1636). Berlin: Springer.
28. Durstewitz, D., Kröner, S., & Güntürkün, O. (1999). The dopaminergic innervation of the avian telencephalon. Progress in Neurobiology, 59, 161-195.
29. Godoy, A. M. (2000). Dopamine and learning in the pigeon (Columba livia). Doctoral thesis. University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
30. Godoy, A. M., & Delius, J. D. (1999). Sensitisation to apomorphine in pigeons due to conditioning, subject to generalisation but resistant to extinction. Behavioural Pharmacology, 10, 367-378.
31. Hilditch, A., Drew, G. M., & Naylor, R. J. (1984). SCH 23390 is a very potent and selective antagonist at vascular dopamine receptors. European Journal of Pharmacology, 97, 333-334.
32. Hinson, R. E., & Poulos, C. X. (1981). Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: Modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 15, 559-562.
33. Hörster, W., Krumm, E., Mohr, C., & Delius, J. D. (2002). Conditioning the pecking motions of pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 58, 27-43.
34. Hyttel, J. (1983). SCH 23390 - the first selective dopamine D-1 antagonist. European Journal of Pharmacology, 91, 153-154.
35. Järbe, T. U. (1984). Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine: Effects of apomorphine, haloperidol, procaine and other drugs. Neuropharmacology, 23, 899-907.
36. Kalant, H. (1989). Drug tolerance and Sensitization: A pharmacological overview. In A. J. Goudie (Ed.), Psychoactive drugs (pp. 547-577). Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
37. Karten, H. J., & Hodos, W. (1967). A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the pigeon (Columba livia). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Kebabian, J. W., & Calne, D. B. (1979, January 11). Multiple receptors for dopamine. Nature, 277, 93-96.
39. Keller, S., & Delius, J. D. (2001). Discriminative learning occasioned by the administration of a dopamine agonist. Psychopharmacology, 157, 320-323.
40. Keller, S., Delius, J. D., & Acerbo, M. J. (2002). Apomorphine sensitization: Evoking conditions, context dependence, effect persistence and conditioned nature. Behavioural Pharmacology, 13, 189-201.
41. Kelley, A. E. (1999). Neural integrative activities of nucleus accumbens subregions in relation to learning and motivation. Psychobiology, 27, 198-213.
42. Kostrzewa, R. M. (1995). Dopamine receptor supersensitivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 19, 1-17.
43. Lappalainen, J., Hietala, J., Pohjalainen, T., & Syvalahti, E. (1992). Regulation of dopamine D1 receptors by chronic administration of structurally different D1 receptor antagonists: A quantitative autoradiographic study. European Journal of Pharmacology, 210, 195-200.
44. Laudrup, P., & Wallace, L. J. (1999). Sensitization elicited by directly and indirectly acting dopaminergic agonists: Comparison using neural network analysis. Psychopharmacology, 141, 169-174.
45. Lindenblatt, U., & Delius, J. D. (1987). Apomorphine-induced pecking in pigeons classically conditioned to environmental cues. Psychopharmacology, 93, 223-225.
46. Lublin, H., Gerlach, J., & Peacock, L. (1993). Chronic treatment with the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, and the D2 receptor antagonist, raclopride, in cebus monkeys withdrawn from previous haloperidol treatment. Extrapyramidal syndromes and dopaminergic supersensitivity. Psychopharmacology, 112, 389-397.
47. Machlis, L. M. (1980). Apomorphine: Effects on the timing and sequencing of pecking behavior in chicks. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 13, 331-336.
48. Mattingly, B. A., & Gotsick, J. E. (1989). Conditioning and experiential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103, 1311-1317.
49. Mattingly, B. A., Koch, C., Osborne, F. H., & Gotsick, J. E. (1997). Stimulus and response factors affecting the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine. Psychopharmacology, 130, 109-116.
50. Moller, H. G., Nowak, K., & Kuschinsky, K. (1987). Conditioning of pre- and post-synaptic behavioural responses to the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine in rats. Psychopharmacology, 91, 50-55.
51. Motles, E., Gomez, A., Tetas, M., & Gonzales, M. (1993). Effects of SCH 23390 and sulpiride on the behaviors evoked by amphetamine and apomorphine in adult cats. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 17, 1005-1022.
52. Nakano, K., Kayahara, T., Tsutsumi, T., & Ushiro, H. (2000). Neural circuits and functional organization of the striatum. Journal of Neurology, 247(Suppl. 5), V1-V15.
53. Osuide, G., & Adejoh, P. O. (1973). Effects of apomorphine and its interactions with other drugs in the domestic fowl. European Journal of Pharmacology, 23, 56-66.
54. Randall, P. K. (1985). Quantification of dopaminergic supersensitization using apomorphine-induced behavior in the mouse. Life Science, 37, 1419-1423.
55. Richtand, N. M., Kelsoe, J. R., Kuczenske, R., & Segal, D. S. (1997). Quantification of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mRNA levels associated with the development of behavioral sensitization in amphetamine treated rats. Neurochemistry International, 31, 131-137.
56. Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (2002). Limbic-striatal memory systems and drug addiction. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 78, 625-636.
57. Schwartz, R. A., Greenwald, E. R., Fletcher, P. J., Houle, S., & DaSilva, J. N. (2003). Up-regulated dopamine D1 receptor binding can be detected in vivo following repeated SCH 23390, but not SKF 81297 or 6-hydroxydopamine, treatments. European Journal of Pharmacology, 459, 195-201.
58. Sealfon, S. C., & Olanow, C. W. (2000). Dopamine receptors: From structure to behavior. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, S34-S40.
59. Severson, J. A., Robinson, H. E., & Simpson, G. M. (1992). Neuroleptic-induced striatal dopamine receptor supersensitivity in mice: Relationship to dose and drug. Psychopharmacology, 84, 115-119.
60. Siemann, M., & Delius, J. D. (1992). Apomorphine-induced behaviour in pigeons (Columba livia). In N. Eisner & N. R. Richter (Eds.), Rythmogenesis in neurons and networks (p. 600). Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme.
61. Stewart, J., & Badiani, A. (1993). Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behavioural Pharmacology, 4, 289-312.
62. Stewart, J., & Vezina, P. (1991). Extinction procedures abolish conditioned stimulus control but spare sensitized responding to amphetamine. Behavioural Pharmacology, 2, 65-71.
63. Tirelli, E. (2001). Short-term contextual sensitization and conditioned hyperkinesia produced by cocaine in suckling rats aged 4-10 days and 14-20 days. Psychopharmacology, 156, 42-52.
64. Tirelli, E., & Heidbreder, C. (1999). Conditioning of and contextual sensitization to apomorphine-induced climbing in mice: Evidence against the habituation hypothesis. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 368-376.
65. Waddington, J. L., & Daly, S. A. (1993). Regulation of unconditioned motor behaviour by D1:D2 interactions. In J. L. Waddington (Ed.), D1:D2 dopamine receptor interactions (pp. 51-78). London: Academic Press.
66. Wickens, J. (1990). Striatal dopamine in motor activation and reward-mediated learning: Steps towards a unifying model. Journal of Neural Transmission, 80, 9-31.
67. Willner, P., Papp, P., Cheeta, S., & Muscat, R. (1992). Environmental influences on behavioural sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behavioural Pharmacology, 3, 43-50.
68. Wynne, B., & Delius, J. D. (1995). Sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons: Unaffected by latent inhibition but still due to classical conditioning. Psychopharmacology, 119, 414-420.
69. Zarrindast, M. R., Hajian-Heydari, A., & Hoseini-Nia, T. (1992). Characterization of dopamine receptors involved in apomorphine-induced pecking in pigeons. General Pharmacology, 23, 427-430.
70. Zavala, A. R., Nazarian, A., Crawford, C. A., & McDougall, S. A. (2000). Cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in the young rat. Psychopharmacology, 151, 291-298.