Sensitization to apomorphine, effects of dizocilpine NMDA receptor blockades

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 151, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 201-208

  Acerbo, Martin J ^a,b   Lee, Jennifer M ^a   Delius, Juan D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Apomorphine; Conditioning; Dizocilpine; Dopamine; Glutamate; MK 801; Pecking; Pigeons; Sensitization

Indexed keywords

APOMORPHINE; DIZOCILPINE; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SENSITIZATION; NONHUMAN; PIGEON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR BINDING; RECEPTOR BLOCKING;

ANIMALS; APOMORPHINE; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COLUMBIDAE; DIZOCILPINE MALEATE; DOPAMINE AGONISTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG INTERACTIONS; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID ANTAGONISTS; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; STEREOTYPED BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 5144230208     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Acerbo MJ, Delius JD. SCH-23390 blockade of behavioural sensitization due to apomorphine, submitted.
2. Acerbo M.J., Gargiulo P.A., Krug I., Delius J.D. Behavioural consequences of nucleus accumbens dopaminergic stimulation and glutamatergic blocking in pigeons. Behav. Brain Res. 136:2002;171-177.
3. Acerbo MJ, Godoy AM, Delius JD. Haloperidol blocks the acquisition, but not the retrieval of a conditioned response induced by apomorphine. Behav Pharmacol, in press.
4. Anagnostaras S.G., Schallert T., Robinson T.E. Memory processes governing amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization. Neuropsychopharmacology. 26:2002;703-715.
5. Basten-Krefft A. Apomorphin-induziertes Verhalten bei Tauben (Apomorphine-induced behaviour in pigeons). Diplomthesis. Bochum, Ruhr-University, Germany; 1977.
6. Battisti J.J., Uretsky N.J., Wallace L.J. Importance of environmental context in the development of amphetamine- or apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior after single and multiple doses. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 66:2000;671-677.
7. Bell K., Duffy P., Kalivas P.W. Context-specific enhancement of glutamate transmission by cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 23:2000;335-344.
8. Bonate P.L., Swann A., Silverman P.B. Context-dependent cross-sensitization between cocaine and amphetamine. Life Sci. 60:1997;PL1-PL7.
9. Bouton M.E. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychol. Bull. 114:1993;80-99.
10. Brami-Cherrie K., Valjent E., Garcia M., Pagès C., Hipskind R.A., Caboche J. Dopamine induces a PI3-kinase-independent activation of Akt in striatal neurons: a new route to cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation. J. Neurosci. 22:2002;8911-8921.
11. Browman K.E., Badiani A., Robinson T.E. The influence of environment on the induction of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of intravenous cocaine in rats is dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology. 137:1998;90-98.
12. Burg B., Hasse C., Lindenblatt U., Delius J.D. Sensitization to and conditioning with apomorphine in pigeons. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 34:1989;59-64.
13. Cador M., Bjijou Y., Stinus L. Evidence of a complete independence of the neurobiological substrates for the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Neuroscience. 65:1995;385-395.
14. Cador M., Taylor J.R., Robbins T.W. Potentiation of the effects of reward-related stimuli by dopaminergic-dependent mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology. 104:1991;377-385.
15. Centonze D., Picconi B., Gubellini P., Bernardi G., Calabresi P. Dopaminergic control of synaptic plasticity in the dorsal striatum. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13:2001;1071-1077.
16. Crombag H.S., Badiani A., Maren S., Robinson T.E. The role of contextual versus drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behav. Brain Res. 116:2000;1-22.
17. Delius JD. The pecking of the pigeon: free for all. In: Lowe CF, Richelle M, Blackman DE, Bradshaw, CM, editors. Behavior analysis and contemporary psychology. New York: Erlbaum; 1985. p. 53-81.
18. Delius J.D., Acerbo M.J., Keller S., Godoy A.M. Drogeninduziertes Lernen: Sensitivierung bei Apomorphin (Drug-induced learning: sensitization to apomorphine). Neuroforum. 4:2002;261-266.
19. Delius JD, Krug I, Acerbo M, Keller S, Leydel R. Sensitization to apomorphine, a multifaceted process, in preparation.
20. Djamoz M.B., Wagmer H.J. Localization and function of dopamine in the adult vertebrate retina. Neurochem. Int. 20:1992;139-191.
21. Druhan J.P., Jakob A., Stewart J. The development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is blocked by MK-801. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 243:1993;73-77.
22. Druhan J.P., Wilent W.B. Effects of the competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist CPP on the development and expression of conditioned hyperactivity and sensitization induced by cocaine. Behav. Brain Res. 102:1999;195-210.
23. Fazeli MS, Collingridge GL. Cortical plasticity: LTP and LTD. Oxford: Bios; 1996.
24. Gancher S., Mayer A. Sensitization to apomorphine-induced rotational behavior in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats: effects of NMDA antagonists on drug response. Brain Res. 682:1995;63-68.
25. Gargiulo P.A., Siemann M., Delius J.D. Visual discrimination in pigeons impaired by glutamatergic blockade of nucleus accumbens. Physiol. Behav. 63:1998;705-709.
26. Gargiulo PA, Acerbo, MJ, Krug I, Delius JD. Cognitive effects of dopaminergic and glutamatergic nucleus accumbens blockades in pigeons, submitted.
27. Godoy AM. Dopamine and learning in the pigeon (Columba livia). Doctoral thesis. Konstanz, Germany: University of Konstanz; 2000.
28. Godoy A., Delius J.D. Sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons due to conditioning, subject to generalisation but resistant to extinction. Behav. Pharmacol. 10:1999;367-378.
29. Hörster W., Krumm E., Mohr C., Delius J.D. Conditioning the pecking motions of pigeons. Behav. Proc. 58:2002;27-43.
30. Jarbe T.U. Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine: effects of apomorphine, haloperidol, procaine and other drugs. Neuropharmacology. 23:1984;899-907.
31. Kalivas P.W., Pierce R.C., Cornish J., Sorg B.A. A role for sensitization in craving and relapse in cocaine addiction. J. Psychopharmacol. 12:1998;49-53.
32. Kandel ER. Cellular mechanisms of learning and the biological basis of individuality. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, editors. Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.p. 1247-79.
33. Keller S., Delius J.D., Acerbo M.J. Apomorphine sensitization: evoking conditions, context dependence, effect persistence and conditioned nature. Behav. Pharmacol. 13:2002;189-201.
34. Keller S., Delius J.D. Discriminative learning occasioned by the administration of a dopamine agonist. Psychopharmacology. 57:2001;320-323.
35. Kelley A.E. Neural integrative activities of nucleus accumbens subregions in relation to learning and motivation. Psychobiology. 27:1999;198-213.
36. Kim H.S., Jang C.G. MK-801 inhibits methamphetamine-induced conditioned place preference and behavioral sensitization to apomorphine in mice. Brain Res. Bull. 44:1997;221-227.
37. Koek W. NMDA antagonists and drug discrimination. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 64:1999;261-275.
38. Lienau A.K., Kuschinsky K. Sensitization phenomena after repeated administration of cocaine or D-amphetamine in rats: associative and non-associative mechanisms and the role of dopamine in the striatum. Naunyn Schmied Arch Pharmacol. 355:1997;531-537.
39. Lindenblatt U., Delius J.D. Apomorphine-induced pecking in pigeons classically conditioned to environmental cues. Psychopharmacology. 93:1987;223-225.
40. Martel P., Fantino M. Mesolimbic dopaminergic system activity as a function of food reward: a microdialysis study. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 53:1996;221-226.
41. Martres M.P., Costentin J., Baudry M., Marcais H., Protais P., Schwartz J.C. Long-term changes in the sensitivity of pre-and postsynaptic dopamine receptors in mouse striatum evidenced by behavioural and biochemical studies. Brain Res. 136:1977;319-337.
42. Mattingly B.A., Koch C., Osborne F.H., Gotsick J.E. Stimulus and response factors affecting the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine. Psychopharmacology. 130:1997;109-116.
43. Mayfor M., Kandel E.R. Genetic approaches to memory storage. Trends Genet. 15:1999;463-470.
44. Muscat R., Iravani M.M., Kruk K.L. The role of ventral tegmental dopamine in locomotor sensitization following quinpirole or (+)amphetamine: ex vivo voltammetric evidence. Neuroscience. 75:1996;1175-1184.
45. Nomikos G.G., Mathé A.A., Mathé J.M., Svensson T.H. MK-801 prevents the enhanced behavioural response to apomorphine elicited by repeated electroconvulsive treatment in mice. Psychopharmacology. 108:1992;367-370.
46. Olds M.E. Dopaminergic basis for the facilitation of brain stimulation reward by the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 306:1996;23-32.
47. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. Addiction. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 54:2002;25-53.
48. Rosenmund C., Clements J.D., Westbrook G.L. Non-uniform probability of glutamate release at a hippocampal synapse. Science. 263:1993;754-757.
49. Schultz W. Dopamine neurons and their role in reward mechanisms. Curr. Opinion Neurobiol. 7:1997;191-197.
50. Smith R.V., Wilcox R.E., Soine W.H., Riffee W.H., Baldessarini R.J., Kula N.S. Plasma levels of apomorphine following intravenous, intraperitoneal and oral administration to mice and rats. Res. Comm. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 24:1979;483-499.
51. Tirelli E., Heidbreder C. Conditioning of and contextual sensitization to apomorphine-induced climbing in mice: evidence against the habituation hypothesis. Behav. Neurosci. 113:1999;368-376.
52. Tovar K.R., Westbrook G.L. Mobile NMDA receptors at hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 34:2002;255-264.
53. Vezina P. D1 dopamine receptor activation is necessary for induction of sensitization by amphetamine in the ventral tegmental area. J. Neurosci. 16:1996;2411-2420.
54. Vezina P., Stewart J. Amphetamine administrated to the ventral tegmental area but not to nucleus accumbens sensitizes rats to systemic morphine: lack of conditioned effects. Brain Res. 516:1990;99-106.
55. Vezzani A., Serafini R., Stast M.A., Coccia S., Conti I., Tridic R.V., Samanin R. Kinetics of MK-801 and its effect on quinolinic acid-induced seizures and neurotoxicity in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 249:1989;278-283.
56. Welsch-Kunze S., Kuschinsky K. On the possible involvement of glutamate receptors in conditioning of behavioural effects of apomorphine. Psychopharmacology. 101:1990;421-428.
57. Willner P., Papp P., Cheeta S., Muscat R. Environmental influences on behavioural sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav. Pharmacol. 3:1992;43-50.
58. Wolf M.E. The role of excitatory amino acids in behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants. Prog. Neurobiol. 54:1998;679-720.
59. Wolf M.E. NMDA receptors and behavioural sensitization; beyond dizocilipine. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 20:1999;188-189.
60. Wynne B., Delius J.D. Sensitization to apomorphine in pigeons: unaffected by latent inhibition latent inhibition but still due to classical conditioning. Psychopharmcology. 119:1995;414-420.