Sensitization of apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior in mice is context dependent

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 146, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 42-48

  Battisti, John J ^a   Uretsky, Norman J ^a   Wallace, Lane J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apomorphine; Environmental context; Mice; Sensitization; Stereotyped behavior

Indexed keywords

APOMORPHINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC NERVE CELL; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG BRAIN LEVEL; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIZATION; STEREOTYPY;

ANIMALS; APOMORPHINE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MALE; MICE; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE; STEREOTYPED BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0032879567     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002130051086     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anagnostaras SG, Robinson TE (1996) Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine. Behav Neurosci 110:1397-1414
2. Badiani A, Anagnostaras SG, Robinson TE (1995a) The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment. Psychopharmacology 117:443-452
3. Badiani A, Browman KE, Robinson TE (1995b) Influence of novel versus home environments on sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and amphetamine. Brain Res 674:291-298
4. Badiani A, Camp DM, Robinson TE (1997) Enduring enhancement of amphetamine sensitization by drug-associated environmental stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282:787-794
5. Battisti JJ, Chang CH, Uretsky NJ, Wallace LJ (1999) Sensitization of stereotyped behavior to amphetamine is context and response dependent. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63:263-269
6. Bedingfield JB, Calder LD, Karler R (1996) Comparative behavioral sensitization to stereotypy by direct and indirect dopamine agonists in CF-1 mice. Psychopharmacology 124:219-225
7. Castro R, Abreu P, Calzadilla CH, Rodriguez M (1985) Increased or decreased locomotor response in rats following repeated administration of apomorphine depends on dosage interval. Psychopharmacology 85:333-339
8. Creese I, Iversen SD (1974) The role of forebrain dopamine systems in amphetamine induced stereotyped behavior in the rat. Psychopharmacology 39:345-357
9. Creese I, Iversen SD (1975) The pharmacological and anatomical substrates of the amphetamine response in the rat. Brain Res 83:419-436
10. Ellinwood EH, Balster RL (1974) Rating the behavioral effects of amphetamine. Eur J Pharmacol 28:35-41
11. Ellinwood EH, Kilbey MM (1975) Amphetamine stereotypy: the influence of enviromental factors and prepotent patterns on its topography and development. Biol Psychol 10:3-16
12. Fibiger HC, Fibiger HP, Zis AP (1973) Attenuation of amphetamine-induced motor stimulation and stereotypy by 6-hydroxydopamine in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 47:683-692
13. Hinson RE, Poulos CX (1981) Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:559-562
14. Jackson HC, Nutt DJ (1993) A single preexposure produces sensitization to the locomotor effects of cocaine in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 45:733-735
15. Jodogne C, Marinelli M, Le Moal M, Piazza PV (1994) Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657:236-244
16. Joyce EM, Iversen SD (1984) Dissociable effects of 6-OHDA-induced lesions of neostriatum on anorexia, locomotor activity and stereotypy: the role of behavioral competition. Psychopharmacology 83:363-366
17. Kalivas PW, Stewart J (1991) Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug-and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res Rev 16:233-244
18. Karler R, Chaudhry IA, Calder LD, Turkanis S (1990) Amphetamine behavioral sensitization and the excitatory amino acids. Brain Res 537:76-82
19. Kelly PH, Iversen SD (1976) Selective 6-OHDA-induced destruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: abolition of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 40:45-56
20. Kelly PH, Roberts DCS (1983) Effects of amphetamine and apomorphine on locomotor activity after 6-OHDA and electrolytic lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:137-143
21. Kelly PH, Seviour PW, Iversen SD (1975) Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 94:507-522
22. Kelly PH, Joyce EM, Minneman KP, Phillipson OT (1977) Specificity of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced destruction of mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine-containing terminals. Brain Res 122:382-387
23. Kinon BJ, Merson D, Kane JM (1984) Effect of daily dose of chronic haloperidol and chronic apomorphine on behavioral hypersensitivity in the rat. Psychopharmacology 84:347-351
24. Litchfield JT, Wilcoxon F (1949) A simplified method for evaluating dose-effect experiments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 96:99-113
25. Mattingly BA, Gotsick JE (1989) Conditioning and experiential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav Neurosci 103:1311-1317
26. Mattingly BA, Gotsick JE, Marin C (1989) Locomotor activity and stereotypy in rats following repeated apomorphine treatments at 1-, 3-, or 7-, day intervals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:871-875
27. Moller HG, Nowak K, Kuschinsky K (1987) Studies on interactions between conditioned and unconditioned behavioral responses to apomorphine in rats. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 335:673-679
28. Pert A, Post R, Weiss SRB (1990) Conditioning as a critical determinant of sensitization induced by psychomotor stimulants. NIDA Res Monogr 97:208-241
29. Randrup A, Munkvad I (1967) Stereotyped behavior produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man. Psychopharmacology 11:300-310
30. Reimer AR, Martin-Iverson MT (1994) Nimodipine and haloperidol attenuate behavioral sensitization to cocaine but only nimodipine blocks the establishment of conditioned locomotion by cocaine. Psychopharmacology 113:404-410
31. Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157-198
32. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of drug addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247-291
33. Robinson TE, Browman KE, Crombag HS, Badiani A (1998) Modulation of the induction or expression of psychostimulant sensitization by the circumstances surrounding drug administration Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:347-354
34. Segal DS, Mandell AJ (1974) Long-term administration of d-amphetamine: progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:249-255
35. Sharp T, Zetterstrom T, Ljungberg T, Ungerstedt U (1987) A direct comparison of amphetamine-induced behaviors and regional brain dopamine release in the rat using intracerebral dialysis. Brain Res 401:322-330
36. Stewart J, Vezina P (1988) Conditioning and behavioral sensitization. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, Caldwell, NJ, pp 207-224
37. Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to d-amphetamine-induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149-153
38. Ungerstedt U (1979) Central dopamine mechanisms and unconditioned behavior. In: Horn AH, Korf J, Westernick BHC (eds) The neurobiology of dopamine. Academic Press, London, pp 577-596
39. von Voigtlander PF, Losey EG, Tiezenberg HJ (1975) Increased sensitivity to dopaminergic agents after chronic neuroleptic treatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 193:88-94
40. Weiss S, Post RM, Pert A, Woodward R, Murman D (1989) Context-dependent cocaine sensitization: differential effect of haloperidol on development versus expression. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 34:655-661