Evaluation of athletic training students' clinical proficiencies

Journal of Athletic Training

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 386-395

  Walker, Stacy E ^a   Weidner, Thomas G ^a   Armstrong, Kirk J ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical competence; Clinical instruction; Evaluation barriers; Standardized patients

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATHLETIC TRAINING STUDENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COLLEGE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SIMULATION; STUDENT T TEST;

EID: 51349162996     PISSN: 10626050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.4.386     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. National Athletic Trainers' Association. Athletic Training Educational Competencies. 4th ed. Dallas, TX: National Athletic Trainers' Association; 2006.
2. Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education. Standards for the accreditation of entry-level athletic training education programs. http://caate.net/documents/standards.12.7.2007.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2008.
3. Cheung MT, Yau KKW. Objective assessment of a surgical trainee. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72(5):325-330.
4. Board of Certification. 2005 Annual report for the National Athletic Trainers' Association Board of Certification. http://www.bocatc.org/images/ stories/public/2005examreport.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2008.
5. National Athletic Trainers' Association Education Council. Athletic Training Educational Competencies. 3rd ed. Dallas, TX: National Athletic Trainers' Association; 1999.
6. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.
7. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Accreditation standards. http://www.lcme.org/functions2006june.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2006.
8. Walsh K, Kugler K, Bennett J. Assessment: taking the "exam" out of evaluation. Athl Ther Today. 2003;8(6):21-26.
9. Middlemas DA, Grant Ford ML. Teaching high-risk clinical competencies: simulations to protect students and models. Athl Ther Today. 2005;10(1):23-25.
10. Vallevand AL, Paskevich DM, Sutter B. Using simulations to assess clinical skills of student athletic therapists. Athl Ther Today. 2005; 10(6):38-41.
11. Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills: AAMC. Acad Med. 1993;68(6): 443-445.
12. Norcini J, Boulet J. Methodological issues in the use of standardized patients for assessment. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15(4):293-297.
13. Ebbert DW, Connors H. Standardized patient experiences: evaluation of clinical performance and nurse practitioner student satisfaction. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2004;25(1):12-15.
14. Yoo MS, Yoo IY. The effectiveness of standardized patients as a teaching method for nursing fundamentals. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(10): 444-448.
15. Hale LS, Lewis DK, Eckert RM, Wilson CM, Smith BS. Standardized patients and multidisciplinary classroom instruction for physical therapist students to improve interviewing skills and attitudes about diabetes. J Phys Ther Educ. 2006;20:22-27.
16. Adamo G. Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003. Med Teach. 2003;25(3):262-270.
17. Williams RG. Have standardized patient examinations stood the test of time and experience? Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(2):215-222.
18. Boulet JR, De Champlain AF, McKinley DW. Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations. Med Teach. 2003;25(3):245-249.
19. Weidner TG, Henning JM. Historical perspective of athletic training clinical education. J Athl Train. 2002;37(suppl 4):222S-228S.
20. Pitney WA. Organizational influences and quality-of-life issues during the professional socialization of certified athletic trainers working in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I setting. J Athl Train. 2006;41(2):189-195.
21. MacCormick M. The changing role of the nurse teacher. Nurs Stand. 1995;10(2):38-41.
22. Pyne R. Breaking the code. Nursing (Lond). 1992;5(3):8-10.