The impact of directionality on Chinese/English simultaneous interpreting

Interpreting

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 137-176

  Chang, Chia Chien ^a   Schauert, Diane L ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Directionality; Interpreting strategies; Retrospection; Simultaneous interpreting

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249144445     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.9.2.02cha     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L. & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research 61 (3), 315-343
2. Al-Khanji, R., El-Shiyab, S. & Hussein, R. (2000). On the use of compensatory strategies in simultaneous interpretation. Meta 45 (3), 548-557
3. Al-Salman, S. & Al-Khanji, R. (2002). The native language factor in simultaneous interpretation in an Arabic/English context. Meta 47 (4), 607-625
4. Barik, H. (1975). Simultaneous interpretation: Qualitative and linguistic data. Language and Speech 18, 272-297
5. Bartłomiejczyk, M. (2004). Simultaneous interpreting A-B vs. B-A from the interpreters' standpoint. In G. Hansen, K. Malmkjær & D. Gile (Eds.), Claims, changes and challenges in translation studies: Selected contributions from the EST Congress Copenhagen 2001. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 239-249
6. Bartłomiejczyk, M. (2006). Strategies of simultaneous interpreting and directionality. Interpreting 8 (2), 149-174
7. Bartsch, R. (1987). Norms of language. New York: Longman
8. Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 157-168
9. Bühler, H. (1986). Linguistic (semantic) and extra-linguistic (pragmatic) criteria for the evaluation of conference interpretation and interpreters. Multilingua 5 (4), 231-235
10. Chang, C. (2005). Directionality in Chinese/English simultaneous interpreting: Impact on performance and strategy use. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin
11. Chesterman, A. (1993). From "is" to "ought": Laws, norms and strategies in translation studies. Target 5 (1), 1-20
12. Chesterman, A. (1997). Memes of translation: The spread of ideas in translation theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
13. Chiaro, D. & Nocella, G. (2004). Interpreters' perception of linguistic and non-linguistic factors affecting quality: A survey through the world wide web. Meta 49 (2), 278-293
14. Christoffels, I. (2004). Cognitive studies in simultaneous interpreting. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam
15. Dam, H. V. (2001). On the option between form-based and meaning-based interpreting: The effect of source text difficulty on lexical target text form in simultaneous interpreting. The Interpreters'Newsletter 11, 27-55
16. Darò, V., Lambert, S. & Fabbro, F. (1996). Conscious monitoring of attention during simultane-ous interpretation. Interpreting 1 (1), 101-124
17. Dawrant, A. C. (1996). Word order in Chinese to English simultaneous interpretation: An initial exploration. MA thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University
18. de Bot, K. (2000). Simultaneous interpreting as language production. In B. Englund Dimitrova & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.), Language processing and simultaneous interpreting. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 65-88
19. Déjean Le Féal, K. (1990). Some thoughts on the evaluation of simultaneous interpretation. In D. Bowen & M. Bowen (Eds.), Interpreting - yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Binghamton, NY: SUNY, 154-160
20. Denissenko, J. (1989). Communicative and interpretative linguistics. In L. Gran & J. Dodds (Eds.), The theoretical and practical aspects of teaching conference interpretation. Udine: Campanotto Editore, 155-157
21. Donovan, C. (2003). Teaching simultaneous interpretation into B. In D. Kelly, A. Martin, M.-L. Nobs, D. Sanchez & C. Way (Eds.), La direccionalidad en traducción e interpretación: Perspectivas teóricas, profesionales y didácticas. Granada: Atrio, 367-380
22. Donovan, C. (2005). Teaching simultaneous interpretation into B: A challenge for responsible interpreter training. In R. Godijns & M. Hinderdael (Eds.), Directionality in interpreting: The 'retour' or the native? Gent: Communication & Cognition, 147-166
23. Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press
24. Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 21-29
25. Garzone, G. (2002). Quality and norms in interpretation. In G. Garzone & M. Viezzi (Eds.), Interpreting in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 107-119
26. Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum
27. Gile, D. (1995). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins
28. Gile, D. (1997). Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In J. H. Danks, G. M. Shreve, S. B. Fountain & M. K. McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive processes in translation and interpreting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 196-214
29. Gile, D. (1999). Norms in research on conference interpreting: A response to Theo Hermans and Gideon Toury. In C. Schäffner (Ed.), Translation and norms. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 98-105
30. Godijns, R. & Hinderdael, M. (Eds.) (2005). Directionality in interpreting: The 'retour' or the native? Gent: Communication & Cognition
31. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday
32. Ivanova, A. (1999). Discourse processing during simultaneous interpreting: An expertise approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge
33. Ivanova, A. (2000). The use of retrospection in research on simultaneous interpreting. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit & R. Jääskeläinen (Eds.), Tapping and mapping the processes of translation and interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 27-52
34. Jänis, M. (2002). From the A language to the B language and from the B language to the A language: What is the difference? In G. Garzone, P. Mead & M. Viezzi (Eds.), Perspectives on interpreting. Bologna: CLUEB, 53-64
35. Jones, R. (1998). Conference interpreting explained. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing
36. Kalina, S. (1998). Strategische Prozesse beim Dolmetschen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag
37. Kohn, K. & Kalina, S. (1996). The strategic dimension of interpreting. Meta 41 (1), 118-138
38. Kornakov, P. (2000). Five principles and five skills for training interpreters. Meta 45 (2), 241-248
39. Kroll, J. F. & Steward, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 149-174
40. Kurz, I. (2001). Conference interpreting: Quality in the ears of the user. Meta 46 (2), 394-409
41. Lee, Y.-H. (2003). Comparison of error frequency in simultaneous interpretation A to B and B to A (Korean-English). Unpublished DEA (pre-doctoral) thesis, University of Geneva, Ecole de Traduction et d'Interprétation
42. Liu, M. (2001). Expertise in simultaneous interpreting: A working memory analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin
43. Liu, M., Schallert, D. L. & Carroll, P. J. (2004). Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting 6 (1), 19-42
44. Martin, A. (2005). Interpreting from A to B: A Spanish case study. In R. Godijns & M. Hinderdael (Eds.), Directionality in interpreting: The 'retour' or the native? Gent: Communication & Cognition, 83-100
45. McAllister, R. (2000). Perceptual foreign accent and its relevance for simultaneous interpreting. In B. Englund Dimitrova & K. Hyltenstam (Eds.), Language processing and simultaneous interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 45-64
46. Monti, C., Bendazzoli, C., Sandrelli, A. & Russo, M. (2005). Studying directionality in simultaneous interpreting through an electronic corpus: EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting Corpus). Meta 50 (4)
47. Moser, P. (1995). Survey on expectations of users of conference interpretation. Geneva: International Association of Conference Interpreters (AIIC)
48. Moser, P. (1996). Expectations of users of conference interpretation. Interpreting 1 (2), 145-178
49. Moser-Mercer, B. (2000/01). Simultaneous interpretating: Cognitive potential and limitations. Interpreting 5 (2), 83-94
50. Pöchhacker, F. (2004). Introducing interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge
51. Riccardi, A. (1995). Language-specific strategies in simultaneous interpreting. In C. Dollerup & V. Appel (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting 3: New horizons. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 213-221
52. Russo, M. & Sandrelli, A. (2003). La direccionalidad en interpretación simultánea: Un estudio sistemático sobre el tratamiento del verbo. In D. Kelly, A. Martin, M.-L. Nobs, D. Sanchez & C. Way (Eds.), La direccionalidad en traducción e interpretación: Perspectivas teoricas, profesionales y didácticas. Granada: Atrio, 407-425
53. Sabatini, E. (2000/01). Listening comprehension, shadowing and simultaneous interpretation of two "non-standard" English speeches. Interpreting 5 (1), 25-48
54. Schaffner, C. (1999). The concept of norms in translation studies. In C. Schaffner (Ed.), Translation and norms. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1-7
55. Schjoldager, A. (1995). Interpreting research and the "Manipulation School" of translation studies. Target 7 (1), 29-45
56. Schweda Nicholson, N. (1992). Linguistic theory and simultaneous interpretation: Semantic and pragmatic considerations. Babel 38 (2), 90-100
57. Seleskovitch, D. (1999). The teaching of conference interpretation in the course of the last 50 years. Interpreting 4 (1), 55-66
58. Setton, R. (1993). Is non-intra-IE interpretation different? European models and Chinese-English realities. Meta 38 (2), 238-256
59. Setton, R. (1999). Simultaneous interpretation: A cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
60. Shlesinger, M. (1999). Norms, strategies and constraints: How do we tell them apart? In A. Álvarez Lugrís & A. Fernández Ocampo (Eds.), Anovar/Anosar estudios de traducción e interpretación. Vol. 1. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo, 65-77
61. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
62. Tommola, J. & Helevä, M. (1998). Language direction and source text complexity: Effects on trainee performance in simultaneous interpreting. In L. Bowker, M. Cronin, D. Kenny & J. Pearson (Eds.), Unity in diversity?: Current trends in translation studies. Manchester: St. Jerome, 177-186
63. Tommola, J. & Laakso, T. (1997). Source text segmentation, speech rate and language direction: Effects on trainee simultaneous interpreting. In K. Klaudy & J. Kohn (Eds.), Transferre necesse est. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting. Budapest: Scholastica, 189-191
64. Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
65. Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4 (1), 105-122
66. Vik-Tuovinen, G.-V. (2002). Retrospection as a method of studying the process of simultaneous interpreting. In G. Garzone & M. Viezzi (Eds.), Interpreting in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63-71
67. Williams, S. ( 1995). Research on bilingualism and its relevance for interpreting. Hermes: Journal of Linguistics 15, 143-154
68. Wu, M. (2001). The importance of being strategic: A strategic approach to the teaching of simultaneous interpreting. Studies of Interpretation and Translation 6, 79-92