Listening comprehension, shadowing and simultaneous interpretation of two ‘non-standard’ english speeches

Interpreting

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 25-48

  Sabatini, Elisabetta ^a,b,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b Russian at the University ^*  (Italy)

^c Russian at the University   (Italy)

Author keywords

English; Interpreter training; Language processing; Linguistic variation; Simultaneous interpreting

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989367386     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.5.1.03sab     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Altman, J. (1994). Error analysis in the teaching of simultaneous interpreting: A pilot study. In S. Lambert &B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 25-37). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
2. Barik, H. (1994). A description of various types of omissions, additions and errors of translation encountered in simultaneous interpretation. In S. Lambert &B. Moser- Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 121-137). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
3. Cartellieri, C. (1983). The inescapable dilemma. Quality and/or quantity in interpreting. Babel, 29/4, 209-213.
4. Dillinger, M. (1994). Comprehension in interpretation and translation. In S. Lambert &B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 155-189). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
5. Frauenfelder, U. I. &Schriefers, H. (1997). A psycholinguistic perspective on simultaneous interpretation. Interpreting, 2 (1/2), 55-89.
6. Galli, C. (1990). Simultaneous interpretation in medical conferences: A case study. In L. Gran &C. Taylor (Eds.), Aspects of applied and experimental research on conference interpretation (pp. 61-82). Udine: Campanotto Editore.
7. Gile, D. (1995). Basic concepts and models in interpreter and translator training. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
8. Gile, D. (1999). Use and misuse of the literature in interpreting research. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 9, 29-43.
9. Kalina, S. (1994). Analysing interpreters’ performance: Methods and problems. In C. Dollerup &A. Lindegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting2. Insights, aims, visions (pp. 225-232). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
10. Lambert, S. (1989). Information processing among conference interpreters: A test of the depth-of-processing hypothesis. In L. Gran &J. Dodds (Eds.), The Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Teaching Conference Interpretation (pp. 83-91). Udine: Campanotto Editore.
11. Pochhacker, F. (1999). Teaching practices in simultaneous interpretation. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 9, 157-176.
12. Trudgill, P & J. Hannah (1994). International English: A guide to the varieties of English. 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold.
13. Viezzi, M. (1996). Aspetti della qualita in interpretazione. Trieste, SSLMT.