Understanding older adults’ attitudes and adoption of residential technologies

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 243-260

  Ahn, Mira ^a   Beamish, Julia O ^b   Goss, Rosemary Carruci ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT MARTIN   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; Diffusion of innovations; Early adopter; Early knower; Older adults; Residential technologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249136906     PISSN: 1077727X     EISSN: 15523934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X07311504     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ahn, M. (2004). Older people’s attitudes toward residential technology: The role of technology in aging in place. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
2. American Association of Retired Persons. (1992). A profile of older Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Bayer, A., & Harper, L. (2000). Fixing to stay: A national survey on housing and home modification issues. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons. Retrieved December 10, 2002, from http://research.aarp.org/il/home_mod_html
4. Borg, K. (1999). The “chauffeur problem” in the early auto era: Structuration theory and the users of technology. Technology and Culture, 40(4), 797–832.
5. Bouma, H., Fozard, J., Harrington, T., & Koster, W. (2000). Overview of the field. T. Harrington & M. Harrington (Eds.), Gerontechnology: Why and how. Retrieved September 1, 2007, from http://www.shaker.nl/catalogus/PDF/90-423-0107-4__pdf/90-423-0107-4_DOK.pdf
6. Center for Aging Services Technologies. (2005, July 11). Boomers willing to pay for technology that allows parents, selves more independent living. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://www.agingtech.org/documents/071105FocusGroupRelease.doc
7. Comley, P. (2000, April). Pop-up surveys: What works, what doesn't work and what will work in the future. Paper presented at the ESOMAR Net Effects Internet Conference, Dublin, Ireland.
8. Czaja, S.J. (1988). Safety and security of the elderly: Implications for smart house design. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 1(1), 49–66.
9. Dholakia, R. (2006). Gender and IT in the household: Evolving patterns of Internet used in the United States. The Information Society, 22(4), 231–240
10. Eastman, F., & Iyer, R. (2004). The elderly’s uses and attitudes towards the Internet. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(3), 208–220.
11. Fischer, C.S. (1992). America calling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Fox, S. (2004, November). Older Americans and the Internet. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Online_2004.pdf
13. Fozard, J., Rietsema, J., Bouma, H., & Graafmans, J. (2000). Gerontechnology: Creating enabling environments for the challenges and opportunities of aging. Educational Gerontology, 26(4), 331–344.
14. Frey, W.H. (1999). New sunbelt metros and suburbs are magnets for retirees. Population Today, 27(9), 1–3.
15. Gitlin, L.N. (1995). Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, 19, 41–45.
16. Gitlen, L.N., Corcoran, M., Winter, L., Boyce, A., & Hauck, W. (2001). Randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: Effect on efficiency and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontology, 41(1), 4–14.
17. Habib, L., & Cornford, T. (2002). Computers in the home: Domestication and gender. Information Technology & People, 15(2), 159–174.
18. Hamill, L. (2000). The introduction of new technology into the household. Personal Technologies, 4(1), 1–16.
19. Hammel, J. (2004). Assistive technology as tools for everyday living and community participation while aging. In D. Burdick & S. Kwon (Eds.), Gerotechnology: Research and practice in technology and aging (pp. 119–131). New York: Springer.
20. Harris, H. (1988). Mature market overview: Marketing the smart house. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 1(1), 67–84.
21. Hazen, M.M., & McCree, S. (2001). Environmental support to assist an older adult with independent living: Safety and activity accommodation in a senior’s home. Journal of housing for the Elderly, 14(1/2), 27–52.
22. LaPlante, M.P., Hendershot, G.E., & Moss, A. (1997). The prevalence of need of assistive technology devices and home accessibility features. Technology and Disability, 6, 17–28.
23. Lawton, M.P. (1989). Three functions of the residential of the residential environments. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 5(1), 35–50.
24. Long, N. (1998). Broken down by age and sex—exploring the ways we approach the elderly consumer. Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 40(2), 73–91.
25. Luborsky, M.R. (1993). Sociocultural factors shaping technology usage: Fulfilling the promise. Technology and Disability, 2(1), 71–78.
26. Lustbader, W. (1997). On bringing older people into the computer age. Generations, 21(3), 30–32.
27. Mann, W.C., Ottenbacher, K.J., Fraas, L., Tomita, M., & Granger, C.V. (1999). Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Family Medicine, 8, 210–217.
28. McQuarrie, E.F. (1989). The impact of a discontinuous innovation: Outcomes experienced by owners of home computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 227–240.
29. Melenhorst, A., Fisk, A., Mynatt, E., & Rogers, W. (2004, September). Potential intrusiveness of AWARE home technology: Perceptions of older adults. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
30. Mollenkopf, H., & Fozard, J. (2003). Technology and the good life: Challenges for current and future generations of aging people. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 23, 250–279.
31. Morini, A., & Biocca, L. (2001, September). Technology to maintain people at home: Italian experiences. Paper presented at the International Conference on Technology and Aging, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
32. Morrell, R., Mayhorn, C., & Bennett, J. (2002). Older adults online in the Internet century. In R. Morrell (Ed.), Older adults, health information, and the World Wide Web (pp. 43–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Morrell, R., Mayhorn, C., & Echt, K. (2004). Why older adults use of do not use the Internet. In D. Burdick & S. Kwon (Eds.), Gerotechnology: Research and practice in technology and aging (pp. 71–85). New York: Springer.
34. Moschis, G. (2003). Marketing to older adults: An updated overview of present knowledge and practice. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(6), 516–525.
35. Mundorf, N., Westin, S., Dholakia, N., & Brownell, M.E. (1992). Reevaluating gender differences in new communication technologies. Communication Research Reports, 9(2), 171–181.
36. Mutzik, D., & Glascock, A. (2004). Monitoring household occupant behaviors to enhance safety and well-being. In D. Burdick & S. Kwon (Eds.), Gerotechnology: Research and practice in technology and aging (pp. 132–144). New York: Springer.
37. Mynatt, E., Melenhorst, A., Fisk, A., & Rogers, W. (2004). Aware technologies for aging in place: Understanding user needs and attitudes. Pervasive Computing, 3(2), 36–41.
38. Newman, S. (2003). The living conditions of elderly Americans. The gerontologist, 43(1), 99–109.
39. Purnell, M., & Sullivan-Schroyer, P. (1997). Nursing home residents using computers: The Winchester House experience. Generations, 21(3), 61–62.
40. Pynoos, J., Nishita, C., & Perelman, L. (2003). Advancement in home modification field: Attribute to M. Powell Lawton. The Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 17(1/2), 105–116.
41. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
42. Rogers, E.M., & Shoemaker, F.F. (1971). Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.
43. Sheehan, K. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(2). Retrieved September 5, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/v016/issue2/sheehan.html
44. Stewart, L.M., & Kaufman, S.B. (1993). High-tech home care: Electronic devices with implications for the design of living environments. Retrieved March 2, 2007, from http://www.homemods.org/library/life-span/high.html
45. Trocchia, P.J., & Janda, S. (2000). A phenomenological investigation of Internet usage among older individuals. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7), 605–616.
46. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005a). 65+ in the United States: 2005. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p23-209.pdf
47. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005b). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Retrieved March 14, 2006, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-229.pdf
48. Venkatesh, A., & Nicosia, F. (1997). New technologies for the home—Development of a theoretical model of household adoption and use. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 5522–5528.
49. Venkatesh, A., & Vitalari, N. (1985). Households and technology: The case of home computers—some conceptual and theoretical issues. In M. L. Roberts & L. Wortzel. (Eds.), Marketing to the changing households: Management and Research Perspectives (pp. 187–203). New York: Ballinger.
50. Venkatesh, A., & Vitalari, N. (1992). Emerging distributed work arrangement: An integration of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science, 38(12), 1687–1706.
51. Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 71–102.
52. Vitalari, N.P., Venkatesh, A., & Gronhaug, K. (1985). Computing in the home: Shifts in the time allocation patterns of households. Communications of the ACM, 28(5), 512–522.
53. Wahl, H., & Mollenkopf, H. (2003). Impact of everyday technology in the home environment on older adults' quality of life. In N. Charness & K. Schaie (Eds.), Impact of technology on successful aging (pp. 215–241). New York: Springer.
54. Wiseman, R.F. (1986). Concentration and migration of older Americans. In R. J. Newcomer & T. O. Byerts (Eds.), Housing an aging society: Issues, alternatives, and policy (pp. 69–82). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
55. Wylde, M.A. (1995). How to size up the current and future markets: Technologies and the older adult. Generations 19(1), 41–46.
56. Zeithaml, V.A., & Gilly, M.C. (1987). Characteristics affecting the acceptance of retailing technologies: A comparison of elderly and non-elderly consumers. Journal of Retailing, 63, 49–68.