A review of transparent and artificial boundary conditions techniques for linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations

Communications in Computational Physics

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 729-796

  Antoine, Xavier ^a   Arnold, Anton ^b   Besse, Christophe ^c   Ehrhardt, Matthias ^d   Schädle, Achim ^e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ HENRI POINCARÉ NANCY 1   (France)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c INRIA   (France)

^d WEIERSTRASS INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED ANALYSIS AND STOCHASTICS   (Germany)

^e ZUSE INSTITUTE BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Discrete convolution; Finite differences schemes; Finite elements; Schr dinger equation; Transparent boundary conditions; Unbounded domain

Indexed keywords

EID: 51149087560     PISSN: 18152406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (137)

1. A. Ahland, D. Schulz and E. Voges, Accurate mesh truncation for Schrödinger equations by a perfectly matched layer absorber: Application to the calculation of optical spectra, Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999), 5109-5112.
2. B. Alpert, L. Greengard and T. Hagstrom, Rapid evaluation of nonreflecting boundary kernels for time-domain wave propagation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37 (2000), 1138-1164.
3. B. Alpert, L. Greengard and T. Hagstrom, Nonreflecting boundary conditions for the time-dependent wave equation, J. Comput. Phys. 180 (2002), 270-296.
4. I. Alonso-Mallo and N. Reguera, Weak ill-posedness of spatial discretizations of absorbing boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2002), 134-158.
5. I. Alonso-Mallo and N. Reguera, Discrete absorbing boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations. construction and error analysis, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41 (2003), 1824-1850.
6. I. Alonso-Mallo and N. Reguera, Adaptive absorbing boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations, in: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on mathematical and numerical aspects of wave propagation, WAVES 2003, Jyväskylä, Finland, Springer, 2003.
7. I. Alonso-Mallo and N. Reguera, Discrete absorbing boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations. Practical Implementation, Math. Comp. 73 (2004), 127-142.
8. X. Antoine and C. Besse, Construction, structure and asymptotic approximations of a microdifferential transparent boundary condition for the linear Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Pures Appl. IX. Sér. 80 (2001), 701-738.
9. X. Antoine and C. Besse, Unconditionally stable discretization schemes of non-reflecting boundary conditions for the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation, J. Comput. Phys. 188 (2003), 157-175.
10. X. Antoine and C. Besse, Artificial boundary conditions for Schröinger-type equations and their numerical approximation, in: Advances in Scientific Computing and Applications, Y.Y. Lu, W.W. Sun and T. Tang Eds., Science Press, Beijing/New York, 2004, pp. 8-21.
11. X. Antoine, C. Besse and S. Descombes, Artificial boundary conditions for one-dimensional cubic nonlinear Schröinger equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2006), 2272-2293.
12. X. Antoine, C. Besse and V. Mouysset, Numerical Schemes for the simulation of the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation using non-reflecting boundary conditions, Math. Comp. 73 (2004), 1779-1799.
13. X. Antoine and M. Darbas, Alternative integral equations for the iterative solution of acoustic scattering problems, Quat. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 58 (2005), 107-128.
14. X. Antoine, M. Darbas and Y.Y Lu, An improved surface radiation condition for high-frequency acoustics scattering problems, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (33-36) (2006), 4060-4074.
15. A. Arnold, Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations, VLSI Design 6 (1998), 313-319.
16. A. Arnold and M. Ehrhardt, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for wide angle parabolic equations in underwater acoustics, J. Comput. Phys. 145 (1998), 611-638.
17. A. Arnold, Mathematical concepts of open quantum boundary conditions, Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 30 (2001), 561-584.
18. A. Arnold, M. Ehrhardt and I. Sofronov, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation: fast calculation, approximation, and stability, Comm. Math. Sci. 1 (2003), 501-556
19. A. Arnold, M. Ehrhardt, M. Schulte and I. Sofronov, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation on circular domains, Preprint No. 41-2007 of the Institute of Mathematics, TU Berlin, November 2007.
20. G.A. Baker, Jr., Essentials of Padé Approximants, Academic Press NY, San Francisco, London, 1975.
21. V.A. Baskakov and A.V. Popov, Implementation of transparent boundaries for numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation, Wave Motion 14 (1991), 123-128.
22. N. Ben Abdallah, F. Méhats and O. Pinaud, On an open transient Schrödinger-Poisson system, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 15 (2005), 667-688.
23. J.-P, Bérenger, A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys. 114 (1994), 185-200.
24. C. Besse, A relaxation scheme for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (3) (2004), 934-952.
25. J.M. Bony, Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularités pour les équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaires, Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup. (4ème série) 14 (1981), 209-246.
26. A. Boutet de Monvel, A.S. Fokas and D. Shepelsky, Analysis of the global relation for the non-linear Schrödinger equation on the half-line, Lett. Math. Phys. 65 (2003), 199-212.
27. C.H. Bruneau and L. Di Menza, Conditions aux limites transparentes et artificielles pour l'équation de Schrödinger en dimension 1 d'espace, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. 1320 (1995), 89-94.
28. L. Burgnies, O. Vanbésien and D. Lippens, Transient analysis of ballistic transport in stublike quantum waveguides, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 (1997), 803-805.
29. N. Carjan, M. Rizea and D. Strottman, Efficient numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for deep tunneling, Roman. Reports Phys. 55 (2003), 555-579.
30. H.S. Carslaw and J.C. Jaeger, Conduction of heat in solids, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1959.
31. T. Cazenave, An Introduction to Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations, Textos de Métodos Matemáticos de Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro, 26, 1996.
32. W. C. Chew and W. H. Weedon, A 3-D Perfectly Matched Medium from modified Maxwell's equations with stretched coordinates, Micro. Opt. Lett. 7 (13) (1994), 599-604.
33. J.F. Claerbout, Coarse grid calculation of waves in inhomogeneous media with application to delineation of complicated seismic structure, Geophysics 35 (1970), 407-418.
34. F. Collino, Perfectly matched absorbing layers for the paraxial equations, J. Comput. Phys. 131 (1997), 164-180.
35. F. Collino, High order absorbing boundary conditions for wave propagation models: straight line boundary and corner cases, Second International Conference on Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation (Newark, DE, 1993), 161-171, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1993.
36. D. Colton and R. Kress, Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York), A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1983.
37. R.A. Dalrymple and P.A. Martin, Perfect boundary conditions for parabolic water-wave models, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 437 (1992), 41-54.
38. A. Dedner, D. Kröner, I. Sofronov and M. Wesenberg, Transparent boundary conditions for MHD simulations in stratified atmospheres, J. Comput. Phys. 171 (2001), 448-478.
39. M. Delfour, M. Fortin and G. Payre, Finite-difference solutions of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Comput. Phys. 44 (1981), 277-288.
40. L. Di Menza, Approximations numériques d'équations de Schrödinger non linéaires et de modèles associés, Ph.D. thesis, Université Bordeaux I, 1995.
41. L. Di Menza, Absorbing boundary conditions on a hypersurface for the Schrödinger equation in a half-space, Appl. Math. Lett. 9 (1996), 55-59.
42. L. Di Menza, Transparent and absorbing boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation in a bounded domain, Numer. Funct. Anal. Opt. 18 (1997), 759-775.
43. G. Doetsch, Anleitung zum praktischen Gebrauch der Laplace-Transformation und der Z-Transformation, R. Oldenburg Verlag München, Wien, 3. Auflage 1967.
44. E. Dubach, Nonlinear artificial boundary conditions for the viscous Burgers equation, Preprint 00/04, Laboratoire de Mathématiques Appliquées, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, France.
45. J. Duque, Solving time-dependent equations of Schrödinger-type using mapped infinite elements, Int. J. Modern Phys. C 2 (2005), 309-316.
46. A. Durán and J.M Sanz-Serna, The numerical integration of relative equilibrium solutions. The nonlinear Schrödinger equation, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 20 (2000), 235-261.
47. M. Ehrhardt, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for parabolic equations, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 77 (1997) S2, 543-544.
48. M. Ehrhardt. Discrete Artificial Boundary Conditions, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, 2001.
49. M. Ehrhardt and A. Arnold, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation, Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma 6 (2001), 57-108.
50. M. Ehrhardt and R.E. Mickens, Solutions to the discrete Airy equation: Application to parabolic equation calculations, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 172 (2004), 183-206.
51. M. Ehrhardt and A. Zisowsky, Fast calculation Of energy and mass preserving solutions of Schrödinger-Poisson systems on unbounded domains, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 187 (2006), 1-28.
52. M. Ehrhardt and A. Zisowsky, Nonlocal boundary conditions for higher-order parabolic equations, Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. (PAMM) 6 (2006), 733-734.
53. M. Ehrhardt and A. Zisowsky, Discrete non-local boundary conditions for Split-Step Pad-ace approximations of the one-way Helmholtz equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 200 (2007), 471-490.
54. M. Ehrhardt, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations for non-compactly supported initial data, Appl. Numer. Math. 58 (2008), 660-673.
55. M. Ehrhardt and C. Zheng, Exact artificial boundary conditions for problems with periodic structures, (accepted for publication: J. Comput. Phys.)
56. M. Ehrhardt, H. Han and C. Zheng, Numerical solution of periodic structure problems with local defects, Preprint No. 48-2007 of the Institute for Mathematics, TU Berlin, 2007. (submitted to: Commun. Comput. Phys.)
57. B. Engquist and A. Majda, Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comp. 31 (1977), 629-651.
58. B. Engquist and A. Majda, Radiation boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave calculations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 32 (1979), 313-357.
59. T. Fevens and H. Jiang, Absorbing boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21 (1999), 255-282.
60. W.R. Frensley, Boundary conditions for open quantum systems driven far from equilibrium, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62 (1990), 745-791.
61. H. Galicher, Transparent boundary conditions for the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation with periodic potential at infinity, submitted to: Commun. Math. Sci., 2007.
62. D. Givoli, Non-reflecting boundary conditions, J. Comput. Phys. 94 (1991), 1-29.
63. D. Givoli, Numerical methods for problems in infinite domains, Studies in Applied Mechanics 33, Elsevier, 1992.
64. D. Givoli, High-order local non-reflecting boundary conditions: a review, Wave Motion 39 (2004), 319-326
65. L. Greengard and J. Strain, A fast algorithm for the evaluation of heat potentials, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 43 (1990), 949-963.
66. C.E. Grosch and S.A. Orszag, Numerical solution of problems in unbounded regions: coordinate transforms, J. Comput. Phys. 25 (1977), 273-296.
67. T. Hagstrom, Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Acta Numerica 8 (1999), 47-106.
68. T. Hagstrom, New results on absorbing layers and radiation boundary conditions, Topics in computational wave propagation, 1-42, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. 31, Springer, Berlin, 2003.
69. E. Hairer and G. Wanner, Solving ordinary differential equations II, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 1991.
70. E. Hairer, Ch. Lubich, and M. Schlichte, Fast numerical solution of nonlinear Volterra convolution equations, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 6 (1985), 532-541.
71. L. Halpern and J. Rauch, Absorbing boundary conditions for diffusion equations, Numer. Math. 71 (1995), 185-224.
72. 2, Comm. Math. Sci. 2 (2004), 79-94.
73. H. Han, J. Jin and X. Wu, A Finite-Difference method for the one-dimensional time-dependent Schrödinger equation on unbounded domain, Comput. Math. Appl. 50 (2005), 1345-1362.
74. 3, Numer. Meth. Partial Diff. Eqs. 23 (2006), 511-533.
75. J.R. Hellums and W.R. Frensley, Non-Markovian open-system boundary conditionsfor the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994), 2904-2906.
76. T. Hohage, F. Schmidt, and L. Zschiedrich. Solving time-harmonic scattering problems based on the pole condition I: Theory. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 35(1):183-210, 2003.
77. S. Jiang, Fast Evaluation of the Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for the Schrödinger Equation, Ph.D. thesis, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 2001.
78. S. Jiang and L. Greengard, Fast evaluation of nonreflecting boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation in one dimension, Comp. Math. Appl. 47 (2004), 955-966.
79. S. Jiang and L. Greengard, Efficient representation of nonreflecting boundary conditions for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in two dimensions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (2007), 261-288.
80. R. Kechroud, X. Antoine and A. Soulaïmani, Numerical accuracy of a Padé-type non-reflecting boundary condition for the finite element solution of acoustic scattering problems at high-frequency, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 64 (2005), 1275-1302.
81. R. Kosloff and D. Kosloff, Absorbing boundaries for wave propagation problems, J. Comput. Phys. 63 (1986), 363-376.
82. J.-P. Kuska, Absorbing boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation on finite intervals, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992), 5000-5003.
83. F. Ladouceur, Boundaryless beam propagation, Opt. Lett. 21 (1996), 4-5.
84. R. Lascar, Propagation des singularités des solutions d'équations pseudo-différentielles quasihomogènes, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 27 (1977), 79-123.
85. M.F. Levy, Non-local boundary conditions for radiowave propagation, in: Third International Conference on Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation Phenomena, Juan-les-Pins, France, 24-28 April 1995.
86. M.F. Levy, Transparent Boundary Conditions for Parabolic Equation Solutions of Radiowave Propagation Problems, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 45 (1997), 66-72.
87. M.F. Levy, Parabolic equation models for electromagnetic wave propagation, IEE Electromagnetic Waves Series 45, 2000.
88. M.F. Levy, Perfectly matched layer truncation for parabolic wave equation models, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 457 (2001), 2609-2624.
89. E.F. Lindmann, Free-space boundary conditions for the time dependent wave equation, J. Comput. Phys. 18 (1985), 16-78.
90. M. López-Fernández, C. Palencia, and A. Schädle, A spectral order method for inverting sectorial Laplace transforms, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 44 (2006), 1332-1350.
91. C. Lubich, Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. I, Numer. Math. 52 (1988), 129-145.
92. C. Lubich, Convolution quadrature and discretized operational calculus. II, Numer. Math. 52 (1988), 413-425.
93. C. Lubich and A. Schädle, Fast convolution for non-reflecting boundary conditions, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24 (2002), 161-182.
94. A. Majda, and S. Osher, Reflection of singularities at the boundary, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 28 (1975), 479-499.
95. C.W. McCurdy, D.A. Homer and T.N. Resigno, Time dependent approach to collisional ionization using exterior complex scaling, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002), 042714.
96. B. Mayfield, Non-local boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, 1989.
97. E.A. Milinazzo, C.A. Zala and G.H. Brooke, Rational square-root approximations for parabolic equation algorithms, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101 (1997), 760-766.
98. C.A. Moyer, Numerov extension of transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation in one dimension, Amer. J. Phys. 72 (2004), 351-358.
99. J.S. Papadakis, Impedance formulation of the bottom boundary condition for the parabolic equation model in underwater acoustics, NORDA Parabolic Equation Workshop, NORDA Tech. Note 143, 1982.
100. J.S. Papadakis, Exact nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for parabolic-type approximations in underwater acoustics J. Comput. Acoust. 2 (1994), 83-98.
101. J.S. Papadakis and E.T. Flouri, A Neumann to Dirichlet map for the bottom boundary of a stratified sub-bottom region in parabolic approximation, accepted for publication: J. Comput. Acoust.
102. A. Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations, Springer, New York 1983.
103. I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations. An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, 198. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1999.
104. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-adjointness, Academic Press, San Diego 1975.
105. L.F. Register, U. Ravaioli and K. Hess, Numerical simulation of mesoscopic system with open boundaries using multidimensional time-dependent Schrödinger Equation, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991), 7153-7158.
106. D. Ruprecht, A. Schädle, F. Schmidt and L. Zschiedrich, Transparent boundary conditions for time-dependent problems, ZIB-Report 07-12, ZIB Berlin, May 2007. Note: accepted for publication in SIAM J. Sci. Comput.
107. D. Ruprecht, A. Schädle, F. Schmidt, Transparent boundary conditions - the pole condition approach, Proceedings of Waves 2007, N. Biggs et.al. eds., 301-303, 2007.
108. A. Schädle, Numerische Behandlung transparenter Randbedingungen für die Schrödinger-Gleichung, Masters Thesis, Universität Tübingen, 1998.
109. A. Schädle, Non-reflecting boundary conditions for the two dimensional Schrödinger equation, Wave Motion 35 (2002), 181-188.
110. A. Schädle, Ein schneller Faltungsalgorithmus für nichtreflektierende Rand-bedingungen, Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Tübingen, 2002.
111. A. Schädle, L. Zschiedrich, S. Burger, R. Klose and F. Schmidt, Domain Decomposition Method for Maxwell's Equations: Scattering of Periodic Structures, J. Comput. Phys. 226 (2007), 477-493.
112. F. Schmidt and P. Deuflhard, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the numerical solution of Fresnel's equation, Comput. Math. Appl. 29 (1995), 53-76.
113. F. Schmidt and D. Yevick, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations, J. Comput. Phys. 134 (1997), 96-107.
114. F. Schmidt, Construction of discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations, Surv. Math. Ind. 9 (1999), 87-100.
115. F. Schmidt, A New Approach to Coupled Interior-Exterior Helmholtz-Type Problems: Theory and Algorithms, Habilitation, Freie Universität Berlin, 2002.
116. M. Schulte, Transparente Randbedingungen für die Schrödinger Gleichung, Diploma Thesis, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 2004.
117. M. Schulte, A. Arnold, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation - a compact higher order scheme, Kinetic and Related Models 1 (2008), 101-125.
118. T. Shibata, Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference time-domain calculation of the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation, Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991), 6760-6763.
119. A. Soffer, C. Stucchio, Absorbing boundaries for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Comput. Phys. 225 (2007), 1218-1232.
120. I.L. Sofronov, Conditions for complete transparency on the sphere for the three-dimensional wave equation, Russian Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math. 46 (1993), 397-401.
121. I.L. Sofronov, Artificial boundary conditions of absolute transparency for two- and three-dimensional external time-dependent scattering problems, Euro. J. Appl. Math. 9 (1998), 561-588.
122. I.L. Sofronov, Non-reflecting inflow and outflow in wind tunnel for transonic time-accurate simulation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 221 (1998), 92-115.
123. C. Sulem and P.-L. Sulem, The nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Applied mathematical sciences 139, Springer, 1999.
124. Z.-Z. Sun and X. Wu. The stability and convergence of a difference scheme for the Schrödinger equation on an infinite domain by using artificial boundary conditions, J. Comput. Phys. 214 (2006), 209-223.
125. J. Szeftel, Calcul Pseudodifférentiel et Paradifférentiel pour l'Etude de Conditions aux Limites Absorbantes et de Propriétés Qualitatives d'Equations aux Dérivées Partielles Non Linéaires, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris, 2004.
126. d, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2004), 1527-1551.
127. J. Szeftel, Absorbing boundary conditions for one-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Numer. Math. 104 (2006), 103-127.
128. J. Szeftel, Absorbing boundary conditions for nonlinear scalar partial differential equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195 (2006), 3760-3775.
129. F.D. Tappert, The parabolic approximation method, in Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics, Lecture Notes in Physics 70, eds. J.B. Keller and J.S. Papadakis, Springer, New York, 1977, pp. 224-287.
130. S.V. Tsynkov, Numerical solution of problems on unbounded domains. A review, Appl. Numer. Math. 27 (1998), 465-532.
131. D. Yevick, T. Friese and F. Schmidt, A comparison of transparent boundary conditions for the Fresnel equation, J. Comput. Phys. 168 (2001), 433-444.
132. C. Zheng, Exact nonreflecting boundary conditions for one-dimensional cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equations, J. Comput. Phys. 215 (2006), 552-565.
133. C. Zheng, A perfectly matched layer approach to the nonlinear Schrödinger wave equations, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2007), 537-556.
134. C. Zheng, An exact absorbing boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation with sinusoidal potentials at infinity, Commun. Comput. Phys. 3 (2008), 641-658.
135. A. Zisowsky, Discrete Transparent Boundary Conditions for Systems of Evolution Equations, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, 2003.
136. A. Zisowsky and M. Ehrhardt, Discrete artificial boundary conditions for nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Math. Comput. Modell. 47 (2008), 1264-1283.
137. L. Zschiedrich, S. Burger, B. Kettner and F. Schmidt, Advanced Finite Element Method for Nano-Resonators, in: Physics and Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices XIV, M. Osinski, F. Henneberger and Y. Arakawa (eds), Proc. SPIE, 6115 (2006), 164-174.