A Comparison of Transparent Boundary Conditions for the Fresnel Equation

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 433-444

  Yevick, David ^a   Friese, Tilmann ^a   Schmidt, Frank ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b ZUSE INSTITUTE BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDITION; FRESNEL EQUATION; PROPAGATION STEP; SCHMIDT; SIMPLE MODIFICATIONS; STEP LENGTH; TRANSPARENT BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; UNCONDITIONALLY STABLE;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

EID: 0037690905     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6708     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baskakov V. A., Popov A. V. Implementation of transparent boundaries for numerical solution of the Schrodinger equation. Wave Motion. 14:1991;121.
2. M. E. Mayfield and D. J. Thomson, An FFT-based non-local boundary condition for the parabolic equation, in 3rd European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, edited by J. S. PapadakisCrete Univ. Press, Heraklion, 1996, Vol. 1, pp. 237-242.
3. Popov A. V. Accurate modeling of transparent boundaries in quasi-optics. Radio Sci. 31:1996;1781.
4. J. S. Papadakis, Impedance formulation of the bottom boundary condition for the parabolic equation model in underwater acoustics, in J. A. Davis, et al., op cit, p, 83.
5. Mayfield M. E., Thomson D. J. A non-reflecting boundary condition for use in PE calculations of sound propagation in air. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:1992;2406.
6. Papadakis J. S. Exact, nonreflecting boundary conditions for parabolic-type approximations in underwater acoustics. J. Comput. Acoust. 2:1994;83.
7. B. Mayfield, Nonlocal Boundary Conditions for the Schrödinger Equation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, 1989.
8. A. Arnold, Numerically Absorbing Boundary Conditions for Quantum Evolution Equations, in, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Electronics, VLSI-Design 63-5, Tempe, AR, 1995.
9. Arnold A. Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations. VLSI Design. 6:1998;313.
10. Arnold A. On absorbing boundary conditions for quantum transport equations. Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 28:1994;853.
11. Arnold A., Ehrhardt M. Discrete transparent boundary conditions for wide angle parabolic equations in underwater acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 145:1998;611.
12. Schmidt F., Deuflhard P. Discrete transparent boundary condition for the numerical solution of Fresnel's equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 29:1995;53.
13. Schmidt F., Yevick D. Analysis of boundary conditions for the Fresnel equation. J. Comput. Phys. 134:1997;96.
14. Yevick D., Thomson D. J. Nonlocal boundary conditions for finite-difference parabolic equation solvers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:1999;143.
15. Schmidt F. Construction of discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equation. Surv. Math. Ind. 9:1999;87.
16. Papadakis J. S., Taroudakis M. I., Papadakis P. J., Mayfield B. A new method for a realistic treatment of the sea bottom in the parabolic approximation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:1992;2030.
17. Thomson D. J., Mayfield M. E. An exact radiation condition for use with the a posteriori PE method. J. Comput. Acoust. 2:1994;113.
18. T. Friese, F. Schmidt, and, D. Yevick, Transparent boundary conditions for a wide-angle approximation of the one-way Helmholtz equation, submitted for publication.
19. Collins M. D. A split-step Padé solution for the parabolic equation method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;1736.
20. F. Schmidt, T. Friese, and, D. Yevick, Transparent Boundary Conditions for Split-Step Padé Approximations of the One-Way Helmholtz equation, Preprint SC99-46, Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum, Berlin, 1999.
21. D. J. Thomson, G. H. Brooke, and, E. S. Holmes, PE approximations for scattering from a rough surface, Technical Memo, 95, - 21, Defense Research Establishment Pacific, Victoria, B.C, 1995.
22. Brooke G. H., Thomson D. J., Wort P. M. A sloping-boundary condition for efficient PE calculations in range-dependent acoustic media. J. Comput. Acoust. 4:1996;11.