Discrete Transparent Boundary Conditions for Wide Angle Parabolic Equations in Underwater Acoustics

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 611-638

  Arnold, Anton ^a,b   Ehrhardt, Matthias ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete transparent boundary conditions; Finite differences; Transparent boundary conditions; Underwater acoustics; Wide angle parabolic equation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; NUMERICAL METHODS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARIES; CYLINDRICAL SYMMETRY; DISCRETE TRANSPARENT BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; DISCRETIZATIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE; PARABOLIC EQUATIONS; SEA BOTTOM; TRANSPARENT BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; WIDE ANGLE; WIDE ANGLE PARABOLIC EQUATION;

UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS;

EID: 0011217467     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6043     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abramowitz M., Stegun I. A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. 55:1965.
2. Ahluwalia D. S., Keller J. B. Exact and asymptotic representations of the sound field in a stratified ocean. Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics. 70:1977;14.
3. Akrivis G. D., Dougalis V. A., Zouraris G. E. Error estimates for finite difference methods for a wide-angle "parabolic" equation. SIAM J. Num. Anal. 33:1996;2488.
4. Amos D. E. Algorithm 644: A portable package for Bessel functions of a complex argument and nonnegative order. ACM Trans. Math. Software. 12:1986;265.
5. Amos D. E. ACM Trans. Math. Software. 16:1990;404.
6. Amos D. E. ACM Trans. Math. Software. 21:1995;388.
7. Arnold A. Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Electronics, Tempe, USA, 1995, VLSI Des. 6:1998;313.
8. Bamberger A., Engquist B., Halpern L., Joly P. Parabolic wave equation approximations in heterogeneous media. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 48:1988;99.
9. Baskakov V. A., Popov A. V. Implementation of transparent boundaries for numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. Wave Motion. 14:1991;123.
10. Bateman Manuscript Project, Tables of Integral Transforms, Vol. 1. 1954.
11. Bruneau C. H., Di Menza L. Conditions aux limites transparentes et artificielles pour l'équation de Schrödinger en dimension 1 d'espace. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I. 320:1995;89.
12. Claerbout J. F. Coarse grid calculation of waves in inhomogeneous media with application to delineation of complicated seismic structure. Geophysics. 35:1970;407.
13. Claerbout J. F. Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing. 1976.
14. Collins M. D. Applications and time-domain solution of higher-order parabolic equations in underwater acoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:1989;1097.
15. Collins M. D. A higher-order parabolic equation for wave propagation in an ocean overlying an elastic bottom. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:1989;1459.
16. M. D. Collins, Higher-order and elastic parabolic equations for wave propagation in the ocean, Computational Acoustics, Vol. 3, D. LeeA. CakmakR. Vichnevetsky, IMACS, New Brunswick, NJ, 1990, 167.
17. Collins M. D. A split-step Padé solution for the parabolic equation method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;1736.
18. Di Menza L. Approximations numériques d'équations de Schrödinger non linéaires et de modèles associés. 1995.
19. Douglas J. Jr., Santos J. E., Sheen D., Bennethum L. S. Frequency domain treatment of one-dimensional scalar waves. Math. Mod. Methods Appl. Sci. 3:1993;171.
20. Dunford N., Schwartz J. T. Linear Operators, Part II: Self-Adjont Operators in Hilbert Space. 1963.
21. Ehrhardt M. Discrete transparent boundary conditions for parabolic equations. Proceedings of the GAMM 96 Conference. 77:1997.
22. Fishman L. Exact and operator rational approximate solutions of the Helmholtz, Weyl composition equation in underwater acoustics - The quadratic profile. J. Math. Phys. 33:1992;1887.
23. Greene R. R. The rational approximation to the acoustic wave equation with bottom interaction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76:1984;1764.
24. Greene R. R. A high-angle one-way wave equation for seismic wave propagation along rough and sloping interfaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:1985;1991.
25. Halpern L., Trefethen L. N. Wide-angle one-way wave equations. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 84:1988;1397.
26. Hellums J. R., Frensley W. R. Non-Markovian open-system boundary conditions for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Phys. Rev. B. 49:1994;2904.
27. Hörmander L. The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators III: Pseudo-Differential Operators. 274:1985.
28. Jensen F. B., Kuperman W. A. Consistency Tests of Acoustic Propagation Models. 157:1982.
29. Lagnese J. E. General boundary value problems for differential equations of Sobolev type. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 3:1972;105.
30. Lee D., McDaniel S. T. Ocean acoustic propagation by finite difference methods. Comput. Math. Appl. 14:1987;305.
31. Lee D., Botseas G., Papadakis J. S. Finite-difference solution to the parabolic wave equation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70:1981;795.
32. Lyness J. N. Algorithm 413: ENTCAF and ENTCRE: Evaluation of normalized Taylor coefficients of an analytic function. Comm. ACM. 14:1971;669.
33. Markowich P. A., Pietra P., Pohl C. Weak limits of finite difference schemes for Schrödinger-type equations. Numer. Math. 1997.
34. Manteuffel T. A., White A. B. Jr. The numerical solution of second order boundary value problems on nonuniform meshes. Math. Comput. 47:1986;511.
35. Mayfield B. Non-local Boundary Conditions for the Schrödinger Equation. 1989.
36. McDaniel S. T., Lee D. A finite-difference treatment of interface conditions for the parabolic wave equation: The horizontal interface. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71:1982;855.
37. J. S. Papadakis, Impedance Formulation of the Bottom Boundary Condition for the Parabolic Equation Model in Underwater Acoustics, NORDA Parabolic Equation Workshop, 1982.
38. Papadakis J. S., Taroudakis M. I., Papadakis P. J., Mayfield B. A new method for a realistic treatment of the sea bottom in the parabolic approximation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:1992;2030.
39. J. S. Papadakis, Impedance bottom boundary conditions for the parabolic-type approximations in underwater acoustics, Advances in Computer Methods for Partial Differential Equations VII, R. VichnevetskyD. KnightG. Richter, IMACS, New Brunswick, NJ, 1992, 585.
40. Reed M., Simon B. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Part I: Functional Analysis. 1987.
41. Schmidt F., Deuflhard P. Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the numerical solution of Fresnel's equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 29:1995;53.
42. Schmidt F., Yevick D. Discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations. J. Comput. Phys. 134:1997;96.
43. F. Schmidt, Construction of discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödinger-type equations, ZIB Berlin, 1997.
44. Szegö G. Orthogonal Polynomials. 23:1967.
45. F. D. Tappert, The parabolic approximation method, Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics, 70, J. B. KellerJ. S. Papadakis, Springer, New York, 1977, 224.
46. Thomson D. J. Wide-angle parabolic equation solutions to two range-dependent benchmark problems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:1990;1514.
47. Thomson D. J., Mayfield M. E. An exact radiation condition for use with the a posteriori PE method. J. Comput. Acoust. 2:1994;113.
48. Vichnevetsky R. Wave propagation and reflection in irregular grids for hyperbolic equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 3:1987;133.
49. Wetton B. T., Brooke G. H. One-way wave equations for seismoacoustic propagation in elastic waveguides. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:1990;624.