Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions. Part I. Queries

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 146-158

  Abels, Eileen G ^a   Liebscher, Peter ^b   Denman, Daniel W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION COMPUTING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

NSFNET CONNECTION;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 0030085218     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199602)47:2<146::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abels, E. G., Barlow, D. L., & Liebscher, P. (in preparation). Factors influencing the adoption and use of electronic networks among scientists and engineers at small colleges and universities (Tech. Rep.). College Park: University of Maryland, College of Library and Information Services.
2. Allen, T. (1969, March). Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 12-19.
3. Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information with the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Atkin, C. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking. In P. Clark (Ed.), New models for mass communication research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Barboni, E. J. (1993. September). Information technologies in independent, liberal arts colleges: A summary and analysis of comparative data (Research Report No. 1 in a series of papers on information technologies). Washington, DC: Council of Independent Colleges.
6. Barlow, D. L., Abels, E. G., & Liebscher, P. (in preparation). Factors influencing the adoption and use of the electronic network by science and engineering faculty at small academic institutions: Pt. II.
7. Bishop, A. P. (1994. Spring). The role of computer networks in aerospace engineering. Library Trends, 42, 694-729.
8. Boehm, E. H., & Horton, F. W., Jr. (1991, Summer/Fall). The ISIM distance-learning methodology and the IRM curriculum. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 32, 26-37.
9. Bump, J. (1990, February/April). Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computers and the Humanities, 24,49-65.
10. Cook, D., & Ridley, M. (1990, December). Computer-mediated communications systems: Will they catch on? Canadian Library Journal, 47, 413-417.
11. Culnan, M. J. (1985). The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information: Implications for the delivery of information systems and services. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 302-308.
12. DeLoughry, T. J. (1994, June 22 ). Is new technology worth it? Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A19, A21.
13. Downing, T. E., Schooley, L. C., Matz, E. M., Nelson, L. N., & Martinez, R. (1988, January). Improving instructor/student interaction with electronic mail. Engineering Education, 78, 247-250.
14. Fussler, H. H. (1949, January). Characteristics of the research literature used by chemists and physicists in the United States. Pt I. Library Quarterly, 19, 19-35.
15. Fussler, H. H. (1949, April). Characteristics of the research literature used by chemists and physicists in the United States. Pt II. Library Quarterly, 19, 119-143.
16. Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
17. Gerstberger, P. G., & Allen, T. J. (1968). Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(4), 272-279.
18. Goldstein, E. S. (1985). The use of technical information by engineers of the electrical sector in Mexico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
19. Harris, J. B. (1989, November). Tailoring telecommunications innovations to fit educational environments. Educational Technology, 29, 7-11.
20. Hert, C. A. (1994). A learning organization perspective on training: Critical success factors for Internet implementation. Internet Research, 4(3), 36-44.
21. Lieb, T. (1990, Summer). Computer conferencing offers new way to think about writing. Journalism Educator, 45(2), 32-37.
22. Liebscher, P., Abels, E., & Denman, D. W. (in preparation). Preliminary benchmarks of the use of the electronic network among science and engineering faculty in small institutions.
23. McEwen, W. (1978). Bridging the information gap. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 247-251.
24. Mick, C. K., Lindsey, G. N., & Callahan, D. (1980, September). Toward usable user studies. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 31, 347-356.
25. Rice, R. E., and Case, D. (1983). Electronic message systems in the university: A description of use and utility. Journal of Communication, 33(1), 131-152.
26. Rosenberg, V. (1967). Factors affecting the preferences of industrial personnel for information gathering methods. Information Storage and Retrieval, 3, 119-127.
27. Shuchman, H. L. (1981). Information transfer in engineering. Glastonbury, CT: The Futures Group.
28. Slater, M. (1963. March). Types of use and users in industrial libraries: Some impressions. Journal of Documentation, 19, 12-18.
29. Stair, T. O., Corn, M., & Broering, N. C. (1990. January). First year's experience of the MAClinical computer workstations project. Academic Medicine, 65 (1), 20-22.
30. Steinfield, C. W. ( 1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. Communication Yearbook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. Wasson, L. E. (1990. January). Electronic mail - teaching it by using it. Business Education Forum, 44(4), 15-17.
32. Wilson, P. (1977). Public knowledge, private ignorance: Toward a library and information policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
33. Zwemer, Raymond L. (1963). A biological information user survey: Discussions and observations. (Studies in Biological Literature and Communications, No. 2, April 9, 1963). Condensed from a report of a survey directed and conducted by the author for biological abstracts from August 1961 to March 1962.