Rule-based extrapolation in perceptual categorization

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 160-168

  Erickson, Michael A ^a   Kruschke, John K ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZATION;

COGNITION; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PERCEPTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 0036516925     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196273     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AKAIKE, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions in Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
2. ALLEN, S. W., & BROOKS, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3-19.
3. BROOKS, L. R., SQUIRE-GRAYDON, R., & WOOD, T. J. (1998). The role of inattention in everyday concept learning: Identification in the service of use. Unpublished manuscript, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
4. BRUNER, J. S., GOODNOW, J. J., & AUSTIN, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
5. BUSEMEYER, J. R., & WANG, Y. M. (2000). Model comparisons and model selections based on generalization criterion methodology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 171-189.
6. CHOI, S., MCDANIEL, M. A., & BUSEMEYER, J. R. (1993). Incorporating prior biases in network models of conceptual rule learning. Memory & Cognition, 21, 413-423.
7. CORANA, A., MARCHESI, M., MARTINI, C., & RIDELLA, S. (1987). Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the "simulated annealing" algorithm. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 13, 262-280.
8. ERICKSON, M. A. (1999). Rules and exemplars in category learning (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(5), 2377B.
9. ERICKSON, M. A., & KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
10. GOFFE, W. L., FERRIER, G. D., & ROGERS, J. (1994). Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing. Journal of Econometrics, 60, 65-99.
11. GRINGS, W. W., SCHELL, A. M., & CAREY, C. A. (1973). Verbal control of an autonomie response in a cue reversal situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 215-221.
12. JACOBS, R. A. (1997). Nature, nurture, and the development of functional specializations: A computational approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 299-309.
13. JACOBS, R. A., JORDAN, M. I., & BARTO, A. G. (1991). Task decomposition through competition in a modular connectionist architecture: The what and where vision tasks. Cognitive Science, 15, 219-250.
14. JACOBS, R. A., JORDAN, M. I., NOWLAN, S. J., & HINTON, G. E. (1991). Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3, 79-87.
15. KALISH, M. L., & KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1997). Decision boundaries in one dimensional categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1362-1377.
16. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
17. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1993a). Human category learning: Implications for back propagation models. Connection Science, 5, 3-36.
18. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1993b). Three principles for models of category learning. In G. V. Nakamura, R. Taraban, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Categorization by humans and machines: The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 29, pp. 57-90). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1996). Dimensional relevance shifts in category learning. Connection Science, 8, 201-223.
20. KRUSCHKE, J. K., & ERICKSON, M. A. (1994). Learning of rules that have high-frequency exceptions: New empirical data and a hybrid connectionist model. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 514-519). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. LEWANDOWSKY, S., KALISH, M. L., & GRIFFITHS, T. L. (2000). Competing strategies in categorization: Expediency and resistance to knowledge restructuring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1666-1684.
22. MCDONALD, R. P., & MARSH, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
23. MEDIN, D. L., & SCHAFFER, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
24. MYUNG, I. J., & PITT, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 79-95.
25. NOELLE, D. C., & COTTRELL, G. W. (1996). Modeling interference effects in instructed category learning. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 475-480). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. NOELLE, D. C. & COTTRELL, G. W. (2000). Individual differences in exemplar-based interference during instructed category learning. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 358-363). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
28. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 87-108.
29. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 54-65.
30. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1989). Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 279-290.
31. NOSOFSKY, R. M., CLARK, S. E., & SHIN, H. J. (1989). Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 282-304.
32. NOSOFSKY, R. M., GLUCK, M. A., PALMERI, T. J., MCKINLEY, S. C., & GLAUTHIER, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory & Cognition, 22, 352-369.
33. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & JOHANSEN, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 375-402.
34. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1992). Investigations of an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 207-250). San Diego: Academic Press.
35. NOSOFSKY, R. M., KRUSCHKE, J. K., & MCKINLEY, S. (1992). Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 211-233.
36. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & PALMERI, T. J. (1996). Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 222-226.
37. PALMERI, T. J. (1999). Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: A comparison of category learning models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 495-503.
38. THOMAS, R. D. (1998). Learning correlations in categorization tasks using large, ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 119-143.