Third-person effects of health news: Exploring the relationships among media exposure, presumed media influence, and behavioral intentions

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 261-277

  Wei, Ran ^a   Lo, Ven Hwei ^b   Lu, Hung Yi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Avian flu; Health news; Information seeking; Third person effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 50849091237     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764208321355     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Atwood, L.E. (1994). Illusions of media power: The third-person effect. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 269-281.
2. Brosius, H., & Engel, D. (1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes towards media influence? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 142-162.
3. Case, D.O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Avian influenza (avian flu). Retrieved October 16, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/ index.htm
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Taiwan. (2005). A report on issues about avian flu prevention. Retrieved March 23, 2006, from http://flu.cdc.gov.tw/news_content.asp?data_id=223
6. Chapin, J. (2002). Third-person perception and school violence. Communication Research Reports, 19, 216-225.
7. Chinese health officials declared a victory on avian flu in 2005. (March 20, 2006). China Times, p. A13.
8. Cohen, J., & Davis, R.G. (1991). Third-person effects and the differential impact in negative political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 680-688.
9. David, P., & Johnson, M.A. (1998). The role of self in third-person effects about body image. Journal of Communication, 48 (4). 37-58.
10. Davison, W.P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-13.
11. Davison, W.P. (1996). The third-person effect revisited. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 113-119.
12. Driscoll, P.D., & Salwen, M.B. (1997). Self-perceived knowledge of the O. J. Simpson trial: Third-person perception and perceptions of guilt. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 541-556.
13. Duck, J.M., & Mullin, B.A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77-93.
14. Eveland, W.P., Jr., Nathanson, A.I., Detenber, B.H., & McLeod, D.M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception. Communication Research, 26, 275-302.
15. Gunther, A. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
16. Gunther, A. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45 (1). 27-38.
17. Gunther, A. (1998). The persuasive press inference: Effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research, 25, 486-504.
18. Gunther, A., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effects. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
19. Gunther, A., & Storey, D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199-215.
20. Gunther, A., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
21. Henriksen, L., & Flora, J.A. (1999). Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research, 26, 643-665.
22. Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2002). Parents' responses to television violence: The third-person perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship. Media Psychology, 4, 231-252.
23. Hoffner, C., Buchanan, M., Anderson, J.D., Hibbs, L.A., Kamigaki, S.K., Kowalczyk, L., et al. (1999). Support for censorship of television violence: The role of the third-person effect and news exposure. Communication Research, 26, 726-742.
24. Huh, J., Delorme, D.E., & Reid, L. (2004). The third-person effect and its influence on behavioral outcomes in a product advertising context: The case of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Communication Research, 31, 568-599.
25. Jensen, J., & Hurley, R. (2005). Third-person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior. Journal of Communication, 55, 242-256.
26. Lasorsa, D.L. (1989). Real and perceived effects of "Amerika." Journalism Quarterly, 66, 373-378, 529.
27. Lo, V.H., & Paddon, A.R. (1998, August). The third-person perception and support for restrictions of pornography: Some methodological problems. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Journalism and Mass Communication, Baltimore, MD.
28. Lo, V.H., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46 (1). 13-33.
29. McLeod, D.M., Detenber, B.H., & Eveland, W.P. (2001). Behind the third-person effects: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51, 678-695.
30. McLeod, D.M., Eveland, W.P., & Nathanson, A.I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153-174.
31. Meirick, P. (2005). Rethinking the target corollary: The effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32, 822-843.
32. Mutz, D.C. (1989). The influence of perceptions of media influence: Third-person effect and the public expression of opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion, 1, 3-23.
33. Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing. Communication Research, 29, 320-359.
34. Paek, H.J., Pan, Z.D., Sun, Y., Abisaid, J., & Houden, D. (2005). The third-person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads. Communication Research, 32, 143-170.
35. Park, S. (2005). The influence of presumed media influence on women's desire to be thin. Communication Research, 32, 594-614.
36. Paul, B., Salwen, M.B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 57-85.
37. Perloff, R.M. (1993). Third-person effect research, 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184.
38. Perloff, R.M. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353-378.
39. Perloff, R.M. (2002). The third-person effect. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Mass effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 489-506). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Price, V., Huang, L.N., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). Third-person effects of news coverage: Orientations toward media. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 525-540.
41. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Huang, L.N. (1998). Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust-denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48 (2). 3-26.
42. Rojas, H., Shah, D.V., & Faber, R.J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186.
43. Salwen, M.B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285.
44. Salwen, M.B., & Driscoll, P.D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47 (2). 60-78.
45. Shah, D., Faber, R., & Youn, S. (1999). Susceptibility and severity: Perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect. Communication Research, 26, 240-267.
46. Street, R.L., Jr. (2003). Mediated consumer-provider communication in cancer care: The empowering potential of new technologies. Patient Education and Counseling, 50, 99-104.
47. Tewksbury, D., Moy, P., & Weis, D. (2004). Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Journal of Communication, 54, 138-155.
48. Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2003). On the effect of the "third-person effect": Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53, 711-727.
49. Wei, R., & Lo, V.H. (2007). Third-person effects of political attack ads in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Media Psychology, 9, 367-388.
50. Weinstein, N. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.
51. Weinstein, N. (1987). Unrealistic optimistic about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusion from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481-500.
52. Weinstein, N. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 31-50.
53. White, H., & Dillon, J. (2000). Knowledge about others' reaction to a public service announcement: The impact on self persuasion and third-person perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 788-803.
54. World Health Organization. (2006). Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A/(H5N1) reported to WHO. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/updates/en/index.html
55. Youn, S., Faber, R., & Shah, D. (2000). Restricting gambling advertising and the third-person effect. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 633-649.