Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust-denial advertisement

Journal of Communication

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 3-26

  Price, Vincent ^a   Tewksbury, David ^a   Huang, Li Ning ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032397251     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02745.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andsager, J. L. (1993, August). Support for media and personal expressive rights: Development of parallel scales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO.
2. Brandeis roiled by holocaust ad. (1993, December 12). New York Times, p. 18.
3. Calvert, C. (1997). Hate speech and its harms: A communication theory perspective. Journal of Communication, 47(1), 4-19.
4. Cohen, J., Mutz, D. Price, V., & Gunther, A. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third-person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173.
5. Cohen, J., & Davis, R. G. (1991). Third-person effects and the differential impact in negative political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 680-698.
6. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
7. Editors. (1991, October 25). Michigan Daily, p. 1.
8. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
9. Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
10. Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 21-39.
11. Gunther, A. C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
12. Gunther, A. C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effect in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
13. Innes, J. M., & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the "third-person" effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457-463.
14. Kagay, M. R. (1994, July 8). Polls on doubt of the Holocaust are corrected. New York Times, p. 10.
15. Lasorsa, D. L. (1989). Real and perceived effects of "Amerika." Journalism Quarterly, 66, 373-378, 529.
16. Libit, H. (1993, April 20). Polls find 1 out of 3 Americans open to doubt there was a Holocaust. Los Angeles Times, p. A17.
17. Lipstadt, D. (1993). Denying the Holocaust: The growing assault on truth and memory. New York: Free Press.
18. McLeod, D., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Support for censorship for violent and misogynic rap lyrics. Communication Research, 24, 153-174.
19. Mutz, D. C. (1989). The influence of perceptions of media influence: Third-person effects and the public expression of opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 3-23.
20. Peerless, M., & Robertson, B. (1991, October 28). Rally protests revisionism. Daily policies. Michigan Daily, p. 3.
21. Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego involvement and the third-person effect of te evised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236-262.
22. Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research, 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184.
23. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1996). Measuring the third-person effect of news: The impact of question order, contrast and knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 120-141.
24. Rucinski, D., & Salmon, C. T. (1990). The "other" as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368.
25. Schoenbach, K., & Becker, L. B. (1995). Origins and consequences of mediated public opinion. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 323-347). New York: Guilford.
26. Smith, B. R. (1991, October 24). The Holocaust controversy: The case for open debate. Michigan Daily, p. 1.
27. Smith, B. R. (1993, October 6). Museum lacks evidence of genocide. Michigan Daily, p. 4.
28. Smith, T. W. (1995). The polls - a review: The Holocaust denial controversy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 269-295.
29. Tiedge, J. T., Silverblatt, A., Havice, M. J., & Rosenfeld, R. (1991). Discrepancy between perceived first-person and perceived third-person mass media effect. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 141-154.
30. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perceptions and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-588.
31. Wyatt, R. O. (1991). Free expression and the American public: A survey commemorating the 200th anniversary of the first amendment. Washington, DC: American Society of Newspaper Editors.