Geographic variation in genital morphology of Ciulfina praying mantids

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 276, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 108-114

  Holwell, G I ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Elliptic Fourier analysis; Genital evolution; Pleiotropy; Sexual selection; Species isolation

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; GRASSHOPPER; MORPHOLOGY; PLEIOTROPY; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALIA; CIULFINA; LITURGUSIDAE; MANTIDAE; MANTODEA;

EID: 50649120651     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00475.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams, D.A., Rohlf, F.J. Slice, D.E. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Ital. J. Zool. 71, 5 16.
2. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
3. Arnqvist, G. (1997). The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60, 365 379.
4. Arnqvist, G. (1998). Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393, 784 786.
5. Arnqvist, G. Danielsson, I. (1999). Copulatory behavior, genital morphology and male fertilization success in water striders. Evolution 53, 147 156.
6. Balderson, J. (1978). Reversal of the phallic complex in the genera Ciulfina Giglio-Tos and Stenomantis Saussure (Mantodea: Mantidae: Iridopteryginae). J. Aust. Ent. Soc. 17, 235 239.
7. Bond, J.E., Hedin, M.C., Ramirez, M.G. Opell, B.D. (2001). Deep molecular divergence in the absence of morphological and ecological change in the Californian coastal dune endemic trapdoor spider Aptostichus simus. Mol. Ecol. 10, 899 910.
8. Boughman, J.W. (2001). Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411, 944 948.
9. Coyne, J.A. Orr, H.A. (2004). Speciation. Sunderland, MA, USA : Sinauer Associates Inc.
10. Eberhard, W.G. (1985). Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
11. Endler, J.A. Houde, A.E. (1995). Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49, 456 468.
12. Gray, D.A. Cade, W.H. (2000). Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. PNAS 97, 14449 14454.
13. Holwell, G.I. (2006). Mating behaviour and genital morphology of Ciulfina praying mantids. PhD thesis. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University.
14. Holwell, G.I., Ginn, S. Herberstein, M.E. (2007). Three new species of Ciulfina (Mantodea: Liturgusidae) from north-eastern Australia. Zootaxa 1583, 23 35.
15. Horton, D.R. Lewis, T.M. (2005). Size and shape differences in genitalia of males from sympatric and reproductively isolated populations of Anthocoris antevolens White (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in the Yakima Valley, Washington. Ann. Entom. Soc. Am. 98, 527 535.
16. Hosken, D.J. Stockley, P. (2004). Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Trends eEcol. Evol. 19, 87 93.
17. House, C.M. Simmons, L.W. (2003). Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 270, 447 455.
18. Hribar, L.J. (1994). Geographic variation of male genitalia of Anopheles nuneztovari (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq. Syst. 26, 132 144.
19. Inger, R.F. Marx, H. (1962). Variation of hemipenis and cloaca in the colubrid snake Calamaria lumbricoidea. Syst. Zool. 11, 32 38.
20. Kelly, C.D., Godin, J.G.J. Abdallah, G. (2000). Geographical variation in the male intromittent organ of the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Can. J. Zool. 78, 1674 1680.
21. King Sirot, L. (2003). The evolution of insect mating structures through sexual selection. Fla. Entomol. 86, 124 133.
22. Klass, K.D. (1997). The external male genitalia and the phylogeny of Blattaria and Mantodea. Bonn Zoologische Monographien 42, 1 341.
23. Kwiatkowski, M.A. Sullivan, B.K. (2002). Geographic variation in sexual selection among populations of an iguanid lizard, Sauromalus obesus. Evolution 56, 2039 2051.
24. Lande, R. (1982). Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36, 213 223.
25. Madec, L. Guillar, A. (1994). Geographic variation of distal genitalia in the landsnail Helix aspersa (Mollusca: Gastropoda). J. Zool. (Lond.) 233, 215 231.
26. Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA, London : Harvard University Press.
27. Moller, A.P. (1995). Sexual selection in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). V. Geographic variation in ornament size. J. Evol. Biol 8, 3 19.
28. Monti, L., Baylac, M. Lalanne-Cassou, B. (2001). Elliptic Fourier analysis of the form of genitalia in two Spodoptera species and their hybrids (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72, 391 400.
29. Mutanen, M. (2005). Delimitation difficulties in species splits: a morphometric case study on the Euxoa tritci complex (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Syst. Ent 30, 632 643.
30. Mutanen, M. Pretorius, E. (2007). Subjective visual evaluation vs. traditional and geometric morphometrics in species delimitation: a comparison of moth genitalia. Syst. Ent. 32, 371 386.
31. Rohlf, F.J. (1993). EFAWin. Stony Brook, NY : Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
32. Rohlf, F.J. (2004). TpsDig2. Stony Brook, NY : Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
33. Rundle, H.D., Chenoweth, S.F., Doughty, P. Blows, M.W. (2005). Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLoS Biol. 3, e 368.
34. Ryan, M.J., Rand, S. Weigt, L.A. (1996). Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution 50, 2435 2453.
35. Shapiro, A.M. Porter, A.H. (1989). The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 34, 231 245.
36. Simmons, L.W., Zuk, M. Rotenberry, J.T. (2001). Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55, 1386 1394.
37. Smith, M.J., Roberts, J.D., Hammond, T.J. Davis, R.A. (2003). Intraspecific variation in the advertisement call of the sunset frog Spicospina flammocaerulea (Anura: Myobatrachidae): a frog with a limited geographic distribution. J. Herpetol. 37, 285 291.
38. Stoner, G. Breden, F. (1988). Phenotypic differentiation in female preference related to geographic variation in male predation risk in the Trinidad guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 285 292.
39. Sullivan, R.M., Calhoun, S.W. Greenbaum, I.F. (1990). Geographic variation in genital morphology among insular and mainland populations of Peromyscus maniculatus and Peromyscus oreas. J. Mammal. 71, 48 58.
40. Tanabe, T., Katakura, H. Mawatari, S.F. (2001). Morphological difference and reproductive isolation: morphometrics in the millipede Parafontaria tonominea and its allied forms. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72, 249 264.
41. Tatsuta, H. Akimoto, S.I.A. (2000). Variability in phenotypic covariance structure of female genitalia in the brachypterous grasshopper Podisma sapporensis (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Podisminae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 93, 127 132.
42. Tregenza, T., Pritchard, V.L. Butlin, R.K. (2000). Patterns of trait divergence between populations of the meadow grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution 54, 574 585.
43. Zeh, D.W. Zeh, J.A. (1994). When morphology misleads: interpopulation uniformity in sexual selection masks genetic divergence in harlequin beetle-riding pseudoscorpion populations. Evolution 48, 1168 1182.