Cultural shifts in teaching: New workforce, new professionalism?

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 253-270

  Storey, Anne ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cultural shift; New professionalism; Performativity; Workforce remodelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 50149117594     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585170701589827     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alexandriou, N., 2001. Management identities in transition: a case study from further education. The Sociological Review, 49 (3): 412–435.
2. Avis, J., 2003. Rethinking trust in a performative culture: the case of education. Journal of Education Policy, 18 (3): 315–332.
3. Avis, J., 2005. Beyond performativity: reflections on active professionalism and the labour process in further education. Journal of Education Policy, 20 (2): 209–222.
4. Ball, S., 2001. “ Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards the performative society ”. In The performing school: managing, teaching and learning in a performance culture, Edited by: Gleeson, D., and Husbands, C., 210–226. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
5. Ball, S., 2003. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18 (2): 215–228.
6. Beckmann, A., and Cooper, C., 2004. ‘Globalization’, the new managerialism and education: rethinking the purpose of education in Britain. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2 (2) September
7. Bernstein, B., 1996. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity, London: Taylor & Francis.
8. Bulmahn, E., 2004. National education standards as part of a comprehensive quality management system in schools. European Education, 15 (4) Winter: 21–25. (Speech given at the joint meeting of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the Conference of State Ministers of Education, and the Federal Institute of Educational Research, Berlin, 18 February 2003)
9. Cabinet Office. 1999. Modernizing government, London: Stationery Office.
10. Codd, J., 1999. Educational reform, accountability and the culture of distrust. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 34 (1): 45–53.
11. Department for Education and Employment. 1998. Teachers: meeting the challenge of change, London: Stationery Office.
12. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). 1999. Teachers meeting the challenge of change: technical consultation document on pay and performance management, London: DfEE Publications Centre.
13. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2001. Teachers' standards framework, London: DfES: /0647/2001.
14. Du Gay, P., 2000. In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics, London: Sage.
15. Eberts, R., Hollenbeck, K., and Stone, J., 2002. Teacher performance and student outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources, 37 (4) Autumn: 913–927.
16. Farrell, C., and Morris, J., 2004. Resigned compliance: teacher attitudes towards performance-related pay in schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32 (1): 81–104.
17. General Teaching Council for England. 2006. 2005 annual digest of statistics, London: GTCE.
18. Gleeson, D., and Husbands, C., 2003. Modernizing schooling through performance management: a critical appraisal. Journal of Education Policy, 18 (5): 499–511.
19. James, M., 2000. Measured lives: the rise of assessment as the engine of change in English schools. The Curriculum Journal, 11 (3): 343–364.
20. Leadbetter, C., 1999. Living on thin air: the new economy, London: Viking.
21. Lyotard, J. F., 1979. The post-modern condition: a report on knowledge, (UK edn), Manchester: Manchester University Press.
22. Mahony, P., and Hextall, I., 2001. “ Performing and conforming ”. In The performing school, Edited by: Gleeson, D., and Husbands, C., London: RoutledgeFalmer.
23. Mahony, P., Menter, I., and Hextall, I., 2004. The emotional impact of performance-related pay on teachers in England. British Journal of Educational Research, 30 (3): 435–456.
24. Morris, E., 2001. Professionalism and trust—the future of teachers and teaching, a speech by Estelle Morris, London: DfES. pamphlet, November
25. Ohler, J., 2001. “ Education standards as a passing fad ”. In The Education Digest, USA: Technos Press.
26. O'Meara, J., and MacDonald, D., 2004. Power, prestige and pedagogic identity: a tale of two programs recontextualizing teacher standards. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32 (2) July
27. Power, M., 1997. The audit society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Rose, N., 1992. “ Governing the enterprising self ”. In The values of the enterprise culture, Edited by: Heelas, P., and Morris, P., 141–164. London: Routledge.
29. Storey, A., and Hutchinson, S., 2002. “ The meaning of teacher professionalism in a quality control era ”. In Early professional development for teachers, Edited by: Shelton, A., London: RoutledgeFalmer.
30. Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., Stark, S., and Warne, T., 2002. Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: teacher and nurse identities in flux. Journal of Education Policy, 17 (1): 109–138.
31. STRB. 2005. Fifteenth report—2005, Norwich: HMSO, Crown Copyright.
32. TDA. 2007. Model performance management policy for schools Available online at: www.tda.gov.uk (accessed 9 May 2007)
33. Thrupp, M., and Tomlinson, S., 2005. Introduction to BERJ special edition on social justice. Introduction: Education policy, social justice and ‘complex hope’. British Educational Research Journal, 31 (5) October: 549–556.
34. Tolofari, S., 2005. New public management in education. Policy Futures in Education, 13 (1): 75–89.
35. Whitt, G., 2002. Making sense of education policy, London: Paul Chapman.