Screening of diabetic retinopathy: Effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography

Diabetes and Metabolism

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 290-293

  Aptel, F ^a   Denis, P ^a   Rouberol, F ^a   Thivolet, C ^a  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; Digital fundus photography; Ophthalmoscopy; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING; EXUDATE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROANEURYSM; MYDRIASIS; NERVE FIBER; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUPIL; SCREENING TEST;

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 49849101314     PISSN: 12623636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2007.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Frank R.N. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 48-58
2. Cantrill H.L. The diabetic retinopathy study and the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study. Int Ophthalmol Clin 24 (1984) 13-29
3. Javitt J.C., and Aiello L.P. Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 124 (1996) 164-169
4. Lee P.P., Feldman Z.W., Ostermann J., Brown D.S., and Sloan F.A. Longitudinal rates of annual eye examinations of persons with diabetes and chronic eye diseases. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1952-1959
5. Weill A., Ricordeau P., Vallier N., Bourrel R., Fender P., and Allemand H. Care and follow-up of non-insulin treated diabetics in metropolitan France in 1998. Diabetes Metab 26 (2000) 39-48
6. King H., Aubert R.E., and Herman W.H. Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 21 (1998) 1414-1431
7. DREES (Direction de la Recherche, des Études, de l'Évaluation et des Statistiques). Bureau des professions de santé. Les projections régionales de démographie médicale. octobre 1999.
8. Williams R., Nussey S., Humphry R., and Thompson G. Assessment of non-mydriatic fundus photography in detection of diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 293 (1986) 1140-1142
9. Maberley D., Cruess A.F., Barile G., and Slakter J. Digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy in the James Bay Cree. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 9 (2002) 169-178
10. Massin P., Aubert J.P., Eschwege E., Erginay A., Bourovitch J.C., BenMehidi A., et al. Evaluation of a screening program for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care setting Dodia (Dépistage ophtalmologique du diabète) study. Diabetes Metab 31 (2005) 153-162
11. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in Europe: 15 years after the Saint Vincent Declaration. Proceedings of the Liverpool Declaration, 17-18 November 2005, Liverpool, UK. Available from: URL: .
12. Murgatroyd H., Ellingford A., Cox A., Binnie M., Ellis J.D., MacEwen C.J., et al. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 88 (2004) 920-924
13. Perrier M., Boucher M.C., Angioi K., Gresset J.A., and Olivier S. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 38 (2003) 569-574
14. Bursell S.E., Cavallerano J.D., Cavallerano A.A., Clermont A.C., Birkmire-Peters D., Aiello L.P., et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 572-585
15. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174