Longitudinal rates of annual eye examinations of persons with diabetes and chronic eye diseases

Ophthalmology

Volumn 110, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1952-1959

  Lee, Paul P ^a   Feldman, Zachary W ^b   Ostermann, Jan ^b   Brown, Derek S ^b   Sloan, Frank A ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE COURSE; EYE DISEASE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICARE; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION;

EID: 0141524139     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00817-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology 1998;105:998-1003.
2. Blomdahl S, Calissendorff BM, Tengroth B, Wallin O. Blindness in glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75: 589-91.
3. Klein R, Klein BE, Jensen SC, Meuer SM. The five-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1997;104:7-21.
4. American Diabetes Association. Position statement: diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2002;25:90-3.
5. Preferred Practice Pattern. Diabetic Retinopathy. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1998.
6. Vijan S, Hofer TP, Hayward RA. Cost-utility analysis of screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2000;283:889-96.
7. Preferred Practice Pattern. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2000.
8. Preferred Practice Pattern. Age-Related Macular Degeneration. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2001.
9. Hays RD, Kravitz RL, Mazel RM, et al. The impact of patient adherence on health outcomes for patients with chronic disease in the Medical Outcomes Study. J Behav Med 1994;17: 347-60.
10. Mukamel DB, Bresnick GH, Wang Q, Dickey CF. Barriers to compliance with screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1999;6:61-72.
11. Lee SJ, Sicari C, Harper CA, et al. Examination compliance and screening for diabetic retinopathy: a 2-year follow-up study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;28:149-52.
12. Blanchard JF, Ludwig S, Wajda A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of diabetes in Manitoba, 1986-1991. Diabetes Care 1996;19:807-11.
13. Kraft SK, Marrero DG, Lazaridis EN, et al. Primary care physicians' practice patterns and diabetic retinopathy: current levels of care. Arch Fam Med 1997;6:29-37.
14. Singer DE, Nathan DM, Fogel HA, Schachat AP. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:660-71.
15. Javitt JC, Aiello LP, Chiang Y, et al. Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care 1994;17: 909-17.
16. Fong DS, Gottlieb J, Ferris FL III, Klein R. Understanding the value of diabetic retinopathy screening. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:758-60.
17. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Diabetes Care 1998;21:518-24.
18. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389-93.