Comparison of two, three and four 45° image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 569-574

  Perrier, Manuel ^a   Boucher, Marie Carole ^a   Angioi, Karine ^a,c   Gresset, Jacques A ^a,b   Olivier, Sébastien ^a  

^a MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; Mass screening; Nonmydriatic camera

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MYDRIASIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SCREENING; SCREENING TEST; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HOSPITALIZATION; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 1542290013     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-4182(03)80110-2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boucher MC, Angioi K, Olivier S, Gresset J. Rapport d'évaluation de la technologie de caméra non mydriatique et de son application dans un contexte de télésanté pour le dépistage de masse de la rétinopathie diabétique [briefing]. Agence d'évaluation de technologies et des modes d'intervention en santé; 2001 Dec 7; Montreal.
2. Aldington SJ, Kohner EM, Meuer S, Klein R, Sjolie AK. Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabetologia 1995;38:437-44.
3. Taylor R, Lovelock L, Tunbridge WMG, Alberg KGM. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ 1999;301:1243-7.
4. Bresnick GH, Mukamel DB, Dickinson JCA, Cole DR. A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of vision-threatening retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2000;107:19-24.
5. Health Technology Board for Scotland. HTBS launches advice for world's first national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. 2002 Apr 2. www.htbs.co.uk/news/ pressrel.asp?did=505 (accessed 2002 May 10).
6. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 suppl):786-806.
7. Taylor R. Practical community screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: report of a 12 centre study. British Diabetic Association Mobile Retinal Screening Group. Diabet Med 1996;13:946-52.
8. Backlund LB, Algvere PB, Rosenqvist U. Early detection of diabetic retinopathy by a mobile retinal photography service working primarily in partnership with primary health care teams. Diabet Med 1998;15(suppl 3):S32-7.
9. Legorreta AP, Hasan MM, Peters AL, Pelletier KR, Leung KM. An intervention for enhancing compliance with screening recommendations for diabetic retinopathy. A bicoastal experience. Diabetes Care 1997;20:520-3.
10. Brailsford SC, Davies R, Canning C, Roderick PJ. Evaluating screening policies for the early detection of retinopathy in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Health Care Manage Sci 1998;1:115-24.
11. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2001;108:572-85.
12. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998;21(suppl 1):S5-19.
13. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
14. Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R, Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, Klein BE. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthahnol Vis Sci 1989;30:823-8.
15. Klein R, Klein BE, Neider MW, Hubbard LD, Neuer SM, Brothers RJ. Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a non-mydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 1985;92:485-91.
16. Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, Van Heuven WAJ, Watters JA, Tuley MR, Lairson DR, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. The wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care 1993;16:889-95.
17. George LD, Halliwell M, Hill R, Aldington SJ, Lusty J, Dunstan F, et al. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 1998;15:250-3.
18. Henricsson M, Karlsson C, Ekholm L, Laikkonen P, Sellman A, Steffert E, et al. Colour slides or digital photography in diabetes screening - a comparison. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:164-8.
19. Gomez-Ulla F, Fernandez MI, Gonzalez F, Rey P, Rodriguez M, Rodriguez-Cid MJ, et al. Digital retinal images and teleophthalmology for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1384-9.