Evaluation of a screening program for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care setting Dodia (Dépistage ophtalmologique du diabète) study

Diabetes and Metabolism

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-162

  Massin, P ^a,h   Aubert, J P ^b   Eschwege, E ^c   Erginay, A ^a   Bourovitch, J C ^b   BenMehidi, A ^a   Nougarede M ^d   Bouee S ^e   Fagnani, F ^e   Tcherny, M S ^f   Jamet, M ^a   Bouhassira, M ^f   Marre, M ^g  

^a HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^b Reseau de Sante Paris Nord   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d Réseau ARES 92   (France)

^e CEMKA EVAL   (France)

^f Lilly France   (France)

^g BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^h ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; Fundus photography; Screening; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DILATED EYE EXAMINATION; EYE FUNDUS; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SCREENING TEST; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 20244381835     PISSN: 12623636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70181-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Franck RN. Diabetic retinopathy. N Eng J Med, 2004, 350, 48-58.
2. Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings report number 8. Ophtalmology, 1981, 88, 583-600.
3. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. EDTRS report number 9. Ophtalmology, 1991, 98, 766-85.
4. American Diabetic Association. Clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care, 1998, 21, SI-S98.
5. World Health Organization/International Foundation Europe. Diabetes care and research in Europe: the Saint Vincent declaration. Diabetes Med, 1990, 7, 360.
6. Agence Nationale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation du Soin (ANAES). Suivi du patient diabétique de type 2 à l'exclusion du suivi des complications. Complications oculaires. Diabètes Metab, 1999, 2, 35-8.
7. Massin P, Angioi-Duprez K, Bacin F, et al. Recommandations de l'ALFEDIAM pour le dépistage et la surveillance de la rétinopathie diabétique. Diabetes Metab, 1996, 22, 203-9.
8. Ricordeau P, Weill A, Bourrel R, et al. Programme de santé publique sur la prise en charge du diabète de type 2. Evolution de la prise en charge des diabétiques non insulinotraités entre 1998 et 2000. Paris, février 2002, Direction du Service Médical, CNAMTS, 92
9. Massin P. Dépistage de la rétinopathie diabétique. Sang Thrombose Vaisseaux, 2003, 15, 249-55.
10. Massin P, Marre M. Place de la photographie du fond d'oeil pour le dépistage de la rétinopathie diabétique. Diabetes Metab, 2002, 28, 151-5.
11. Tadayoni R, Massin P. Dépistage de la rétinopathie diabétique: la rétinographie non mydriatique. Ann Endocrinol, 2003, 64, IS45-IS50.
12. Hutchison A, Mc Intosh A, Peters J, et al. Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med, 2000, 17, 495-506.
13. Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, Van Heuven, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. The wide angle camera. Diabetes Care, 1993, 16, 889-95.
14. Massin P, Erginay A, Ben Mehidi A, et al. Evaluation of a new non-mydriatic digital camera for detection of diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med, 2003, 20, 635-41.
15. Massin P, Aubert JP, Erginay A, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: first telemedical approach in a primary care setting. Diabetes Metab, 2004, 30, 451-7.
16. Fagot-Campagna A, Simon D, Varroud-Vial M, et al. Caractéristiques des personnes diabétiques traitées et adéquation du suivi médical du diabète aux recommandations officielles. Entred 2001. BEH, 2003, 49-50, 238-9.
17. CNAMTS (Caisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés). Rapport sur la Démographie en Ophtalmologie, de 2000-2020. Published in 2004, http://www.ameli.fr.
18. Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM, et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30. Diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophtalm, 1998, 116, 297-303.
19. Delcourt C, Vauzelle-Kervroedan F, Catherlineau G, Papoz L and the Codiab Inserm Zeneca Pharma study group. Low prevalence of long term complication in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in France: a multicenter study. Etude CODIAB. J Diabetes Complic, 1998, 12, 88-95.
20. Younis N, Broadbent DM, Vora JP, Harding SP. Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. Incidence of sight-threatening retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study: a cohort study. Lancet, 2003, 361, 195-200.
21. Porta M, Sjoelie AK, Chaturvedi N, Stevens L, et al. Risk factors for progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the EURODIAB prospective complications study. Diabetologia, 2001, 44, 2203-9.
22. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med, 1993, 329, 977-86.
23. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet, 1998, 342, 837-53.
24. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes; UKPDS 38. B Med J, 1998, 317, 703-18.
25. Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, White MC, Vora J. Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease. The Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. B Med J, 1995, 311, 1131-5.
26. Kinyoun JL, Martin DC, Fujimoto WY, Leonetti DL. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1992, 33, 11888-93.
27. Moss SE, Klein R, Kessler SD, Richie K. Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining the severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology, 1995, 92, 2-67.
28. Taylor R, Lovelock L, Turnbridge MG, et al. Comparison of non mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retina camera study. B Med J, 1990, 301, 1243-7.
29. Gomez-Ulla F, Fernandez MI, Gonzales F, Rey P, et al. Digital retinal images and teleophthalmology for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care, 2002, 25, 1384-9.
30. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of single field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophtalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic colour photography. Am J Ophtalmol, 2002, 134, 204-13.
31. DREES (Direction de la Recherche, des Etudes de l'Evaluation et des Statistiques). Bureau des professions de santé. Les projections régionales de démographie médicale. Octobre 1999.