Is Laparoscopic Resection Appropriate for Colorectal Adenocarcinoma?

Advances in Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue C, 2008, Pages 205-217

  Soop, Mattias ^a   Nelson, Heidi ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; COLON TUMOR; COLORECTAL TUMOR; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; RECTUM TUMOR; REVIEW;

ADENOCARCINOMA; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 49849092647     PISSN: 00653411     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2008.03.010     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. COST Study Group, Nelson H., Sargent D.J., Wieand S., et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 2050-2059
2. Bonjer H.J., Hop W.C., Nelson H., et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142 (2007) 298-303
3. Jayne D.G., Guillou P.J., Thorpe H., et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25 (2007) 3061-3068
4. Weeks J.C., Nelson H., Gelber S., et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287 (2002) 321-328
5. Fleshman J., Sargent D.J., Green E., et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246 (2007) 655-664
6. Veldkamp R., Kuhry E., Hop W.C., et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6 (2005) 477-484
7. Guillou P.J., Quirke P., Thorpe H., et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365 (2005) 1718-1726
8. Stage J.G., Schulze S., Moller P., et al. Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 84 (1997) 391-396
9. Hewitt P.M., Ip S.M., Kwok S.P., et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: comparative study of immune effects. Dis Colon Rectum 41 (1998) 901-909
10. Schwenk W., Bohm B., Haase O., et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383 (1998) 49-55
11. Milsom J.W., Bohm B., Hammerhofer K.A., et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187 (1998) 46-54 [discussion: 54-5]
12. Curet M.J., Putrakul K., Pitcher D.E., et al. Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: perioperative results and long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 14 (2000) 1062-1066
13. Delgado S., Lacy A.M., Filella X., et al. Acute phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancer: randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 44 (2001) 638-646
14. Lacy A.M., Garcia-Valdecasas J.C., Delgado S., et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359 (2002) 2224-2229
15. Neudecker J., Junghans T., Ziemer S., et al. Effect of laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection on peritoneal fibrinolytic capacity: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 17 (2002) 426-429
16. Winslow E.R., Fleshman J.W., Birnbaum E.H., et al. Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16 (2002) 1420-1425
17. Braga M., Vignali A., Gianotti L., et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236 (2002) 759-766 [disscussion: 767]
18. Hasegawa H., Kabeshima Y., Watanabe M., et al. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 636-640
19. Kaiser A.M., Kang J.C., Chan L.S., et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14 (2004) 329-334
20. Leung K.L., Kwok S.P., Lam S.C., et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363 (2004) 1187-1192
21. Kang J.C., Chung M.H., Chao P.C., et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18 (2004) 577-581
22. Basse L., Jakobsen D.H., Bardram L., et al. Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 416-423
23. Liang J.T., Huang K.C., Lai H.S., et al. Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 109-117
24. Tjandra J.J., and Chan M.K. Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 8 (2006) 375-388
25. Jackson T.D., Kaplan G.G., Arena G., et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 204 (2007) 439-446
26. Allendorf J.D., Bessler M., Horvath K.D., et al. Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic bowel resection in mice. Surg Endosc 12 (1998) 1035-1038
27. Carter J.J., Feingold D.L., Kirman I., et al. Laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy is associated with decreased formation of postoperative pulmonary metastases compared with open cecectomy in a murine model. Surgery 134 (2003) 432-436
28. Whelan R.L., Franklin M., Holubar S.D., et al. Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 972-978
29. Kirman I., Cekic V., Poltaratskaia N., et al. The percentage of CD31 + T cells decreases after open but not laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 754-757
30. Kirman I., Cekic V., Poltoratskaia N., et al. Open surgery induces a dramatic decrease in circulating intact IGFBP-3 in patients with colorectal cancer not seen with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19 (2005) 55-59
31. Belizon A., Balik E., Feingold D.L., et al. Major abdominal surgery increases plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor: open more so than minimally invasive methods. Ann Surg 244 (2006) 792-798
32. Janson M., Lindholm E., Anderberg B., et al. Randomized trial of health-related quality of life after open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 747-753
33. Urbach D.R., Harnish J.L., McIlroy J.H., et al. A measure of quality of life after abdominal surgery. Qual Life Res 15 (2006) 1053-1061
34. Fearon K.C., Ljungqvist O., Von Meyenfeldt M., et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24 (2005) 466-477
35. Soop M., Nygren J., and Ljungqvist O. Optimizing perioperative management of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: what is new?. Curr Opin Crit Care 12 (2006) 166-170
36. Wind J., Polle S.W., Fung Kon Jin P.H., et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93 (2006) 800-809
37. Basse L., Madsen J.L., and Kehlet H. Normal gastrointestinal transit after colonic resection using epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg 88 (2001) 1498-1500
38. Basse L., Thorbol J.E., Lossl K., et al. Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47 (2004) 271-277 [discussion: 277-8]
39. Andersen J., Hjort-Jakobsen D., Christiansen P.S., et al. Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 94 (2007) 890-893
40. Wind J., Hofland J., Preckel B., et al. Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; laparoscopy and/or fast track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 6 (2006) 16-24
41. King P.M., Blazeby J.M., Ewings P., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93 (2006) 300-308
42. Rawlings A.L., Woodland J.H., Vegunta R.K., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 1701-1708
43. Bessler M., Stevens P.D., Milone L., et al. Transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy: a hybrid approach to natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 66 6 (2007) 1243-1245
44. Marescaux J., Dallemagne B., Perretta S., et al. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142 (2007) 823-826 [discussion: 826-7]
45. Whiteford M.H., Denk P.M., and Swanstrom L.L. Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 1870-1874
46. Yamamoto H. Technology insight: endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4 (2007) 511-520
47. Noblett S.E., Snowden C.P., Shenton B.K., et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 93 (2006) 1069-1076
48. Auerbach A.D., and Goldman L. Beta-blockers and reduction of cardiac events in noncardiac surgery: scientific review. JAMA 287 (2002) 1435-1444
49. Kaba A., Laurent S.R., Detroz B.J., et al. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiology 106 (2007) 11-18 [discussion: 5-6]
50. McCarty T.M., Arnold D.T., Lamont J.P., et al. Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg 242 (2005) 494-498 [discussion: 498-501]
51. Aziz O., Constantinides V., Tekkis P.P., et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13 (2006) 413-424
52. Gao F., Cao Y.F., and Chen L.S. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 21 (2006) 652-656