Optimizing perioperative management of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: What is new?

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 166-170

  Soop, Mattias ^a   Nygren, Jonas ^a   Ljungqvist, Olle ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b ERSTA HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Fluid therapy; Length of stay; Perioperative care; Recovery of function

Indexed keywords

ALVIMOPAN; CARBOHYDRATE; OPIATE ANTAGONIST;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EUROPE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MORBIDITY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; REVIEW; WOUND DRAINAGE;

EID: 33645302934     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000216586.62125.6d     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Fast-track surgery. Br J Surg 2005; 92:3-4.
2. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, et al. Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ 2005; 330:1420-1421. This survey reveals a large gap between evidence and clinical practice in surgical care, and highlights the difficulty in transforming scientific evidence into daily practice in the complexity of perioperative care.
3. Ljungqvist O, Soreide E. Preoperative fasting. Br J Surg 2003; 90:400-406.
4. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24:466-477. This is a consensus statement from the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) study group, outlining current best clinical practice in perioperative care in colonic surgery, along with the evidence supporting it.
5. Nygren J, Soop M, Frändén E, et al. Accelerated recovery with a fast-track programme in colonic resection and TME. In: Second Joint Meeting, European Association of Coloproctology; 15-17 September 2005; Bologna. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005. p. 7.
6. Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K, et al. Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:277-278; discussion 271-277.
7. Gatt M, Anderson AD, Reddy BS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 2005; 92:1354-1362. This RCT, although small, shows clear clinical benefits of an enhanced-recovery protocol in an unselected patient population.
8. Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, et al. 'Fast-track' multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:1463-1468.
9. Zutshi M, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with pre-emptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Am J Surg 2005; 189:268-272. This was the first study of the clinical effects of epidural analgesia within the context of a fast-track protocol. Although no effects on postoperative length of stay or morbidity were seen in this relatively small study, gastrointestinal function tended to be better in the epidural group than in the systemic opioid group.
10. Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, et al. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2003; 290:2455-2463.
11. Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S, et al. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (4):CD001893.
12. ••].
13. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, et al. Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 2005; 241:416-423. A methodologically ambitious, patient-blinded and assessor-blinded RCT of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection within the context of an established, highly successful enhanced-recovery protocol. Since none of the previously shown benefits of laparoscopic surgery could be seen in this protocol, in which perioperative care was optimized, the role of surgical technique in this context remains unclear.
14. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the surgical intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1359-1367.
15. Soop M, Carlson GL, Hopkinson J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enterai nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1138-1145. This study showed that it is possible to avoid postoperative hyperglycaemia and increased nitrogen losses if insulin resistance is minimized using epidural analgesia and preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment. This is a way to avoid the use of insulin in the postoperative ward.
16. Ljungqvist O, Nygren J, Thorell A. Modulation of post-operative insulin resistance by pre-operative carbohydrate loading. Proc Nutr Soc 2002; 61:329-336.
17. Yuill KA, Richardson RA, Davidson HI, et al. The administration of an oral carbohydrate-containing fluid prior to major elective upper- gastrointestinal surgery preserves skeletal muscle mass postoperatively - a randomised clinical trial. Clin Nutr 2005; 24:32-37. This was the first double-blinded RCT of preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment of unselected patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. This intervention resulted in minimized losses of lean body mass.
18. Crowe P, Dennison A, Royle G. The effect of preoperative glucose loading on postoperative nitrogen metabolism. Br J Surg 1984; 71:635-637.
19. Soop M, Nygren J, Thorell A, et al. Preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment attenuates endogenous glucose release 3 days after surgery. Clin Nutr 2004; 23:733-741.
20. Henriksen MG, Hessov I, Dela F, et al. Effects of preoperative oral carbohydrates and peptides on postoperative endocrine response, mobilization, nutrition and muscle function in abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:191-199.
21. Schricker T, Gougeon R, Eberhart L, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the catabolic response to surgery. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:320-326. This study underlined the role of metabolic derangements for the increased risk of postoperative complications, previously repeatedly reported for patients with diabetes.
22. Slim K, Vicaut E, Panis Y, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1125-1130. This is one of two recent meta-analyses that independently show not only an absence of benefit from routine preoperative oral bowel preparation, but also an increased risk of anastomotic dehiscence.
23. ••], partially performed on the same RCTs, the question arises whether routine preoperative oral bowel preparation should be considered contra-indicated.
24. Vlot EA, Zeebregts CJ, Gerritsen JJ, et al. Anterior resection of rectal cancer without bowel preparation and diverting stoma. Surg Today 2005; 35:629-633.
25. Holte K, Nielsen KG, Madsen JL, et al. Physiologic effects of bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1397-1402.
26. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238:641-648.
27. Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, et al. Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359:1812-1818.
28. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, et al. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:25-32. This key paper reporting a large RCT of intraoperative fluid 'restriction', supporting previous work by showing significantly lower morbidity and gastrointestinal paralysis in the 'restricted' fluids group. Targeting zero weight gain postoperatively can be a useful clinical goal for perioperative fluid therapy. Interestingly, this study confirmed results from reducing saline infusion also when using balanced salt solutions.
29. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365:1718-1726.
30. Jesus E, Karliczek A, Matos D, et al. Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4):CD002100. This meta-analysis clearly underlines that the use of routine wound drainage after colonic surgery is unnecessary. Routine wound drainage hampers mobilization and has no place in enhanced-recovery programmes.
31. Bretagnol F, Slim K, Faucheron JL. Anterior resection with low colorectal anastomosis. To drain or not? [in French] Ann Chir 2005; 130:336-339.
32. Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM, et al. Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting mu opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 2004; 240:728-734; discussion 734-725. This multicentre RCT demonstrated clinical efficacy of perhaps the first drug that attenuates postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, a significant problem in recovery after colorectal surgery. This may become an important addition for patients in need of opioids to control pain, and potentially have even wider use.
33. Brix-Christensen V, Tonnesen E, Sanchez RG, et al. Endogenous morphine levels increase following cardiac surgery as part of the antiinflammatory response? Int J Cardiol 1997; 62:191-197.