Preventing secondary cataract and anterior capsule contraction by modification of intraocular lenses

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 197-207

  Matsushima, Hiroyuki ^a   Iwamoto, Hidetoshi ^b   Mukai, Kouichiro ^a   Katsuki, Yoko ^c   Nagata, Mayumi ^a   Senoo, Tadashi ^a  

^a DOKKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b B Braun Aesculp Japan Co Ltd   (Japan)

^c HOYA CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anterior capsular contraction; Cell adhesion; Drug delivery; Intraocular lens; Postcataract surgery complications; Secondary cataract; Square edge; Surface modification; UV ozone

Indexed keywords

OZONE;

ACCOMMODATION; ANTERIOR CAPSULE CONTRACTION; LENS IMPLANT; MULTIFOCAL LENS; NONHUMAN; OZONE THERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; SECONDARY CATARACT; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; VISION; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTRACTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LENS IMPLANTATION;

CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTRACTURE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 49849088545     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.5.2.197     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Olson RJ, Werner L, Mamalis N et al. New intraocular lens technology. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 140, 709-716 (2005).
2. Horwitz J, Jaffe NS. Opacification of the posterior capsule. In: Lens and Cataract, Gower Medical Publishing. New York, NY, USA, 12 (1992).
3. Kodama T. Posterior capsular opacification: Classification and pathogenesis. J. Jpn. Cataract Res. 17, 34-40 (2005).
4. Linnola RJ, Werner L, Pandey SK et al. Adhesion of fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials in pseudophakic human autopsy eyes. Part 2: explanted intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 26, 1807-1818 (2000).
5. Wormstone IM, Tamiya S, Anderson I et al. TGF-β2-induced matrix modification and cell transdifferentiation in the human lens capsular bag. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43, 2301-2308 (2002).
6. Saika S, Miyamoto T, Tanaka S et al. Response of lens epithelial cells to injury: role of lumican in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 2094-2102 (2003).
7. Miyake K, Ota I, Ichihashi S et al. New classification of capsular block syndrome. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 24, 1230-1234 (1998).
8. Obara Y, Akagi Y, Ibaraki N et al. Guidelines for management of cataract. J. Jpn Cataract Res. 16 (2004).
9. Matsushima H, Mukai K, Obara Y et al. Analysis of cytoskeletal proteins in posterior capsule opacification after implantation of acrylic and hydrogel intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 30, 187-194 (2004).
10. Miyara A, Uchida N, Nakajima K et al. Clinical and experimental observation of glistening in acrylic intraocular lenses. Jpn J. Ophthalmol. 45, 564-569 (2001).
11. Nishihara H, Yaguchi S, Onishi T et al. Surface scattering in implanted hydrophobic intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 29, 1385-1388 (2003).
12. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F. Reduction in the area of the anterior capsule opening after polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 123, 441-447 (1997).
13. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F et al. Changes in posterior capsule opacification after poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and acrylic intraocular lens implantation. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 27, 817-824 (2001).
14. Ram J, Kaushik S, Brar GS et al. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy rates following phacoemulsification with implantation of PMMA, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers 32, 375-382 (2001).
15. Nagata T, Watanabe I. Optic shape edge or convexity. Comparison of effects on posterior capsular opacification. Jpn J. Opthalmol. 40, 397-403 (1996).
16. Nishi O, Nishi K. Preventing posterior capsule opacification by creating a discontinuous sharp bend in the capsule. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 25, 521-529 (1999).
17. Auffarth GU, Golescu A, Becker KA et al.. Quantification of posterior capsule opacification with round and sharp edge intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 110, 772-780 (2003).
18. Findl O, Buehl W, Menapace R et al. Long-term effect of sharp optic edges of a polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 112, 2004-2008 (2005).
19. Nishi O, Nishi K, Akura J. Speed of capsular bend formation at the optic edge of acrylic, silicone, and poly(methyl methacrylate) lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 28, 431-437 (2002).
20. Schmidbauer JM, Escobar-Gomez M, Apple DJ et al. Effect of haptic angulation on posterior capsule opacification in modern foldable lenses with a square, truncated optic edge. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 28, 1251-1255 (2002).
21. Nagamoto T. Up-to-date information on acrylic foldable intraocular lenses. J. Eye 20, 577-583 (2003).
22. Mamalis N, Crandall AS, Linebarger E et al. Effect of intraocular lens size on posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 21, 99-102 (1995).
23. Meacock WR, Spalton DJ, Boyce JF et al. Effect of optic size on posterior capsule opacification: 5.5 mm versus 6.0 mm AcrySof intraocularlenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 27, 1194-1198 (2001).
24. Nishi O, Nishi K. Effect of the optic size of a single-piece acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 29, 348-353 (2003).
25. Corydon C, Lindholt M, Knudsen EB et al. Capsulorhexis contraction after cataract surgery: comparison of sharp anterior edge and modified anterior edge acrylic intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33, 796-799 (2007).
26. Tadros A, Bhatt UK, Abdul Kar Karim MN et al. Removal of lens epithelial cells and the effect on capsulorhexis size. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 31, 1569-1574 (2005)
27. Tobari I, Iwaki Y, Miyake K. Effect of tranilast eyedrops in preventing posterior capsule opacification: preliminary report. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 25, 1394-1399 (1999).
28. Mastropasqua L, Lobefalo L, Ciancaglini M et al. Heparin eyedrops to prevent posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 23, 440-446 (1997)
29. Inan UU, Ozturk F, Kaynak S et al. Prevention of posterior capsule opacification by intraoperative single-dose pharmacologic agents. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 27, 1079-1087 (2001).
30. Legler UF, Apple DJ, Assia EI et al. Inhibition of posterior capsule opacification: the effect of colchicine in a sustained drug delivery system. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 19, 462-470 (1993).
31. Nishi O, Nishi K, Morita T et al. Effect of intraocular sustained release of indomethacin on postoperative inflammation and posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 22, 806-810 (1996).
32. Matsushima B, Mukai K, Gotoo N et al. The effects of drug delivery via hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel) intraocular lens systems on the epithelial cells in culture. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging 36, 386-392 (2005).
33. Lundgren B, Holst A, Trnholm A et al. Cellular reaction following cataract surgery with implantation of the heparin-surface-modified intraocular lens in rabbits with experimental uveitis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 18, 602-606 (1992).
34. Shah SM, Spalton DJ. Comparison of the postoperative inflammatory response in the normal eye with heparin-surface-modified and poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 21, 579-585 (1995).
35. Winther-Nielson A, Johansen J, Pedersen GK et al. Posterior capsule opacification and neodymium: YAG capsulotomy with heparin-surface-modified intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 24, 940-944 (1998).
36. Okajima Y, Saika S, Sawa MJ. Effect of surface coating an acrylic intraocular lens with poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) polymer on lens epithelial cell line behavior. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 666-671 (2006).
37. Shigeta M, Tanaka T, Koike N et al. Suppression of fibroblast and bacterial adhesion by MPC coating on acrylic intraocularlenscs. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 859-866 (2006).
38. Eloy R, Parrat D, Duc TM et al. In vitro evaluation of inflammatory cell response after CF4 plasma surfacemodification of poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 19, 364-370 (1993).
39. Matsushima H, Iwamoto H, Mukai K et al. Active oxygen processing for acrylic intraocular lenses to prevent posterior capsule opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 1035-1040 (2006).
40. Linnola RJ, Holst A. Evaluation of a 3H pieces silicone intraocular lens with poly (methyl methacrylate) haptics. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 24, 1509-1514 (2001).
41. Nakamae K, Yamaguchio K. Mobility of molecular chain on surface of polymer material. Polymer applications 42, 522-525 (1993).
42. Iida T. Effect of adhesion properties of UV curing adhesive by UV ozone surface modification. Technology on adhesion and sealing 46, 207-210 (2002).
43. Mateo NB, Ratner BD. Relating the surface properties of intraocular lens materials to endothelial cell adhesion damage. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30, 853-860 (1989).
44. Dick HB, Frohn A, Augustin AJ et al. Physicochemical surface properties of various intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic. Res. 33, 303-309 (2001).
45. Matsushima H, Iwamoto H, Mukai K et al. Prevention of posterior capsular opacification using round-edged PMMA IOL. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33, 1133-1134 (2007).
46. Arima Y, Horikawa T, Iwata H. Cell adhesion on the surface preadsorbed with fibronectin and albumin. Polymer Preprint 54, 2244 (2005).