Responsible shareholding and investor engagement in the U.K

Corporate Integrity and Accountability

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 238-252

  Collier, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49549119708     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452225685.n18     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Adams, R. (2002, March 16). CIS shoots at EasyJet. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,668390,00.html
2. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675
3. Association of British Insurers. (2001a). Investing in social responsibility: Risks and opportunities. London: ABI.
4. Association of British Insurers. (2001b). Disclosure guidelines in socially responsible investment. London: ABI.
5. Becker, L. C. (1979). Property theory and the corporation. In M. Hoffman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Business Ethics. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
6. Black, B. S. (1998). Shareholder activism and corporate governance in the United States. In P. Newman (Ed.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
7. Blair, M. (1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the 21st century. Washington: Brookings Institution.
8. Blair, M. (1998). For whom should corporations be run? An economic rationale for stakeholder management. Long-Range Planning, 31(2), 195-200. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00003-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301%2898%2900003-X
9. CIS. (2002a). Responsible shareholding, past, present and future. Manchester: Co-operative Insurance Society.
10. CIS. (2002b). Sustainability pays. Report by Forum for the Future and PIRC. Retrieved from http://www.cis.co.uk
11. CIS. (2002c). Social Accountability Report 2001. Retrieved from http://www.cis.co.uk/sar2002/default.asp
12. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
13. Coles, D., & Green, D. (2002). Do pension funds invest responsibly? A survey of current practice on socially responsible investment. Retrieved from http://www.justpensions.org
14. Cook, J., & Deakin, S. (1999a). Stakeholding and corporate governance: Theory and evidence on economic performance. Research Paper 1 for UK Company Law Review. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
15. Cook, J., & Deakin, S. (1999b). Empirical evidence on corporate control. Research Paper 10 for UK Company Law Review. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
16. Covey, J. C. (1996). Critical cooperation? Influencing the World Bank through policy dialogue and operational cooperation. In J. Fox & L. D. Brown (Eds.), The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and grassroots movements (pp. 81-120). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
17. Covey, J. C., & Brown L. D. (2001). Critical cooperation: An alternative form of civil society-business engagement (Institute of Development Research Report 17:1). Hauser Center for Non-Profit Organizations, Harvard University.
18. Deakin, S. (2002). Squaring the circle? Shareholder value and corporate social responsibility in the UK. George Washington Law Review, 70(5/6), 1701-1711.
19. DelGuercio, D., & Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(3), 293-364. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00011-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X%2899%2900011-2
20. Demsetz, H. (1967). Towards a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57, 347-359.
21. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
22. Dresner, S. (2002). Assessing engagement: A survey of UK practice on socially responsible investment. Retrieved from http://www.justpensions.org
23. Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1991). The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
25. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1-21. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00280
26. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-206.
27. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13-47.
28. Gribbin, C., & Olsen L. (2003). Will pension funds become more responsible? A survey of membernominated trusts. Retrieved from http://www.justpensions.org
29. Hill, C. W. C., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 131-154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x
30. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency theory and ownership structure. The Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X%2876%2990026-X
31. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
32. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-214.
33. Lydenberg, S. D. (2002). Envisioning socially responsible investment: A model for 2006. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 7, 57-77.
34. McLaren, D. (2002). Engagement practices in socially responsible investment: Competing paradigms of governance and the emergence of standards. MBA dissertation, Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge.
35. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
36. Myners review of institutional investment in the UK: Final report. (2001, March). HM Treasury, U.K.
37. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
38. Pearce, B., & Ganzi, J. (2002). Engaging the mainstream with sustainability: A survey of investor engagement on corporate SEE performance. Report by Forum for the Future and Finance Institute for Global Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.forumforthefuture.org
39. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
40. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
41. Roberts, J. (2000). Trust and control in the UK system of corporate governance: The individualising and socialising effects of processes of accountability. Judge Institute research papers in management studies, WP22/2000.
42. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influence. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-891.
43. Rowley, T. J. (2000). Does relational context matter? An empirical test of a network theory of stakeholder influence. In J. M. Logsdon, D. J. Wood, & L. E. Benson (Eds.), Research in stakeholder theory, 1997-1998: The Sloan Foundation minigrant project (pp. 21-38). University of Toronto, Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics.
44. Savage, G. T., Blair, J. D., & Sorenson, R. L. (1989). Consider both relationships and substance when negotiating strategically. Academy of Management Executive, 3(1), 037-49. doi:10.5465/AME.1989.4277149 http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AME.1989.4277149
45. Slinger, G. (1999). Spanning the gap: The theoretical principles that connect stakeholder policies to business performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(2), 136-151. doi:10.1111/1467-8683.00142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00142
46. Sparkes, R. (2001). Ethical investment: Whose ethics, which investment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 194-205. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00233
47. Sparkes, R. (2002). Socially responsible investment: A global revolution. London: John Wiley & Sons.
48. Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 16-26. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00208
49. Taylor, R. (2000). How new is socially responsible investment? Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(3), 174-179. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00188
50. Taylor, R. (2001). Putting ethics into investment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 53-60. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00212
51. Taylor, R. (2002). Science and ethical investment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(1), 77-85. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00260
52. Useem, M. (1996). Investor capitalism: How money managers are changing the face of corporate America. New York: Basic Books.
53. Wheeler, D., & Sillanpaa, M. (1997). The stakeholder corporation. London: Pitman.
54. Wood, D. (1994). Business and society (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.