Estimating incumbency advantage and its variation, as an example of a before-after study

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 103, Issue 482, 2008, Pages 437-446

  Gelman, Andrew ^a   Huang, Zaiying ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b Circulation Department

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Before after study; Congressional election; Gibbs sampler; Incumbency advantage; Metropolis algorithm; Multilevel model

Indexed keywords

EID: 49549110483     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1198/016214507000000626     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Achen, C. (1986), The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Alford, J. R., and Brady, D. W. (1988), "Partisan and Incumbent Advantage in U.S. House Elections, 1846-1986," report, Center for the Study of Institutions and Values, Rice University.
3. Alford, J. R., and Hibbing, J. R. (1981), "Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House," Journal of Politics, 43, 1042-1061.
4. Ansolabehere, S., and Snyder, J. M. (2002a), "The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942-2000," Election Law Journal, 1, 315-338.
5. _ (2002b), "Using Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages When Officeholders Retire Strategically," technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science.
6. Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M., and Stewart, C. (2000), "Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage," American Journal of Political Science, 44, 17-34.
7. Campbell, J. E. (2002), "Is the House Incumbency Advantage Mostly a Campaign Finance Advantage?" State University of New York at Buffalo, Dept. of Political Science.
8. Cleveland, W. S. (1979), "Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 829-836.
9. Cox, G. W., and Katz, J. (1996), "Why Did the Incumbency Advantage Grow?" American Journal of Political Science, 40, 478-497.
10. Cox, G. W., and Morgenstern, S. (1993), "The Increasing Advantage of Incumbency in U.S. States," Legislative Studies Quarterly, 18, 495-514.
11. Erikson, R. S. (1971), "The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections," Polity, 3, 395-405.
12. Gelman, A. (2004), "Treatment Effects in Before-After Data," in Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference From Incomplete Data Perspectives, eds. A. Gelman and X. L. Meng, London: Wiley, pp. 195-202.
13. Gelman, A., and King, G. (1990), "Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias," American Journal of Political Science, 34, 1142-1164.
14. _ (1994), "Enhancing Democracy Through Legislative Redistricting," American Political Science Review, 88, 541-559.
15. Gelman, A., and Rubin, D. B. (1992), "Inference From Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences" (with discussion), Statistical Science, 7, 457-511.
16. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B. (1995), Bayesian Data Analysis, London: Chapman & Hall.
17. Gelman, A., King, G., and Boscardin, W. J. (1998), "Estimating the Probability of Events That Have Never Occurred," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 1-9.
18. Gelman, A., Meng, X. L., and Stern, H. S. (1996), "Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness via Realized Discrepancies" (with discussion), Statistica Sinica, 6, 733-807.
19. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, London: Chapman and Hall.
20. Hobert, J. P., and Casella, G. (1996), "The Effect of Improper Priors on Gibbs Sampling in Hierarchical Linear Mixed Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1461-1473.
21. Jacobson, G. C. (2000), "Reversal of Fortune: The Transformation of U.S. House Elections in the 1990s," in Continuity and Change in House Elections, eds. D. W. Brady, J. F. Cogan, and M. P. Fiorina, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 10-38.
22. King, G., and Gelman, A. (1991), "Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections," American Journal of Political Science, 35, 110-138.
23. Krashinsky, M., and Milne, W. J. (1993), "The Effects of Incumbency in U.S. House Elections," Legislative Studies Quarterly, 18, 321-344.
24. Lee, D. S. (2003), "Randomized Experiments From Non-Random Selection in U.S. House Elections," technical report, University of California, Berkeley, Dept. of Economics.
25. Levitt, S. D., and Wolfram, C. D. (1997), "Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House," Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22, 45-60.
26. Louis, T. A. (1984), "Estimating a Population of Parameter Values Using Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 393-398.
27. Mulligan, C. B., and Hunter, C. G. (2001), "The Empirical Frequency of a Pivotal Vote," Working Paper 8590, National Bureau of Economic Research.
28. Payne, J. L. (1980), "The Personal Electoral Advantage of House Incumbents," American Politics Quarterly, 8, 375-398.
29. van Dyk, D. A., and Meng, X. L. (2001), "The Art of Data Augmentation" (with discussion), Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 1-111.
30. Yang, L., and Tsiatis, A. A. (2001), "Efficiency Study of Estimators for a Treatment Effect in a Pretest-Posttest Trial," The American Statistician, 55, 314-321.