Females avoid manipulative males and live longer

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 523-530

  Moore, Allen J ^a   Gowaty, P A ^b   Moore, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Female mate choice; Fitness; Longevity; Pheromone; Sexual conflict; Sexual selection; Social dominance

Indexed keywords

SEX PHEROMONE;

COCKROACH; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; COCKROACH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; COCKROACHES; FEMALE; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; BLABERIDAE; BLATTARIA; DICTYOPTERA; NAUPHOETA CINEREA;

EID: 0038560018     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00527.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Apfield, J. & Kenyon, C. 1999. Regulation of lifespan by sensory perception in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 402: 804-809.
3. Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10 460-10 464.
4. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002. Antagonistic co-evolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787-789.
5. Berglund, A., Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. 1996. Arnaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 385-399.
6. Chapman, T., Liddle, L.F., Kalb, J.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Partridge, L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland proteins. Nature 373: 241-244.
7. Choe, J.C. & Crespi, B.J. 1997. The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Corley, L.S., Blankenship, J.R. & Moore, A.J. 2001. Genetic variation and asexual reproduction in the facultatively parthenogenetic cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea: implications for the evolution of sex. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 68-74.
9. Crudington, H.S. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407: 855-856.
10. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control.: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Gavrilets, S. Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. London Series B 268: 531-539.
12. Gowaty, P.A. 1996. Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Partnerships in Birds (J. M. Black, ed.), pp. 21-52. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Gowaty, P.A. 1997. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in reproductive behavior. In: Feminism and Evolutionary Biology (P. A. Gowaty, ed.), pp. 351-384. Chapman & Hall, New York.
14. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1998. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1-7.
15. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review. Biol. Rev. 72: 283-327.
16. Keller, L. & Nonacs, P. 1993. The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? Anim. Behav. 45: 787-794.
17. Moore, A.J. 1988. Female preferences, male social status, and sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim. Behav. 36: 303-305.
18. Moore, A.J. 1989. Sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea: inherited mating preferences? Behav. Genet. Behav. Genet. 19: 717-724.
19. Moore, A.J. 1990. The inheritance of social dominance, mating behaviour, and attractiveness to mates in Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim. Behav. 39: 288-397.
20. Moore, A.J. 1994. Genetic evidence for the 'good-genes' process of sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 235-241.
21. Moore, A.J. 1997. The evolution of social signals: morphological, functional and genetic integration of the sex pheromone in Nauphoeta cinerea. Evolution 51: 1920-1928.
22. Moore, A.J. Gowaty, P.A. Wallin, W.G. & Moore, P.J. 2001. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series B 268: 517-523.
23. Moore, A.J., Haynes, K.F., Preziosi, R.F. & Moore, P.J. 2002. The evolution of interacting phenotypes: genetics and evolution of social dominance. Am. Nat. 160: 5186-5197.
24. Moore, P.J., Haynes, K.F., Reagan-Wallin, N.L. & Moore, A.J. 1997. Odour conveys status on cockroaches. Nature 389: 25.
25. Moore, A.J. & Moore, P.J. 1999. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proc. R. Soc. London Series B 266: 711-716.
26. Moore, A.J., Reagan, N.L. & Haynes, K.F. 1995. Conditional signalling strategies: effects of ontogeny, social experience and social status on the pheromonal signal of male cockroaches. Anim. Behav. 50: 191-202.
27. Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum, eds), pp. 123-166. Academic Press, New York.
28. Qvarnström, A. & Forsgren, E. 1998. Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 498-501.
29. Roth, L.M. 1962. Hypersexual activity induced in females of the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea. Science 138: 1267-1269.
30. Roth, L.M. 1964a. Control of reproduction in female cockroaches with special reference to Nauphoeta cinerea. I. First pre-oviposition period. J. Insect Physiol. 10: 915-945.
31. Roth, L.M. 1964b. Control of reproduction in female cockroaches with special reference to Nauphoeta cinerea. II. Gestation and postparturition. Psyche 71: 198-244.
32. Schal, C., Gautier, J.-Y. & Bell, W.J. 1984. Behavioural ecology of cockroaches. Biol. Rev. 59: 209-254.
33. Stern, K. & McClintock, M.K. 1998. Regulation ovulation by human pheromones. Nature 392: 177-179.
34. Stutt, A.D. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2001. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimx lectularius. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5683-5687.