Reduced strain in abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 453-461

  Brekken, Reidar ^a,c,d   Dahl, Torbjørn ^b,c   Hernes, Toril A N ^a,c   Myhre, Hans Olav ^b,c  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^d SIIMTEF Health Research   (Norway)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Stent graft; Strain; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; AORTA WALL; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART CYCLE; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STENTS;

EID: 49449096807     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/07-2349.1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rhee RY, Eskandari MK, Zajko AB, et al. Long-term fate of the aneurysmal sac after endoluminal exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:689-696.
2. Wolf YG, Hill BR, Rubin GD, et al. Rate of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:108-115.
3. White GH, May J, Petrasek P, et al. Endotension: an explanation for continued AAA growth after successful endoluminal repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6:308-315.
4. Heikkinen MA, Arko FR, Zarins CK. What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension. Surg Clin N Am. 2004;84:1337-1352.
5. Zarins CK, Bloch DA, Crabtree T, et al. Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:109-117.
6. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048-1060.
7. Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T, et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1029-1038.
8. Alimi YS, Chakfe N, Rivoal E, et al. Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular graft placement and aneurysm size reduction. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:178-183.
9. Gawenda M, Heckenkamp J, Zaehringer M, et al. Intra-aneurysm sac pressure - the holy grail of endoluminal grafting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24:139-145.
10. Dias NV, Ivancev K, Malina M, et al. Intraaneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1229-1235.
11. Malina M, Länne T, Ivancev K, et al. Reduced pulsatile wall motion of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:624-631.
12. Faries PL, Agarwal G, Lookstein R, et al. Use of cine magnetic resonance angiography in quantifying aneurysm pulsatility associated with endoleak. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:652-656.
13. Vos AW, Wisselink W, Marcus JT, et al. Cine MRI assessment of aortic aneurysm dynamics before and after endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:433-439.
14. Brekken R, Bang J, Ødegård A, et al. Strain estimation in abdominal aortic aneurysms from 2D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:33-42.
15. Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13:111-134.
16. Selbekk T, Bang J, Unsgaard G. Strain processing of intraoperative ultrasound images of brain tumours: initial results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:45-51.
17. Heimdal A, Støylen A, Torp H, et al. Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11: 1013-1019.
18. Vos AW, Wisselink W, Marcus JT, et al. Aortic aneurysm wall motion imaged by cine MRI: a tool to evaluate efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:158-161.
19. Thubrikar MJ, Labrosse M, Robicsek F, et al. Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Med Eng Techn. 2001;25:133-142.
20. Mehta M, Darling RC, Chang BB, et al. Does sac size matter? Findings based on surgical exploration of excluded abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:183-188.
21. Risberg B, Delle M, Eriksson E, et al. Aneurysm sac hygroma: a cause of endotension. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8:447-453.
22. Mehta M, Veith FJ, Ohki T, et al. Significance of endotension, endoleak, and aneurysm pulsatility after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:842-846.
23. Raghavan ML, Vorp D, Federle MP, et al. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:760-769.
24. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, et al. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:724-732.